For Radical Centrists not to speak out at this time would be  irresponsible.
 
The following story , in various forms, is now breaking all over the  Web.
There's lots more and some of it is even worse.
 
The following story is also breaking on TV.
 
Anyone here can support whomever he wants to, that is not the issue. We  
have 
divided opinions about who would be the best candidate for president in  
2012,
and some of us,  myself anyway, would prefer a 3rd party candidate who  
actually
has a chance to win and who espouses ideas similar to RC, even if this is  
highly unlikely.
All of this is understood.
 
But  we need to make it clear that Ron Paul's views and values,  obviously 
not all of them, 
speaking of the obvious, are antithetical to Radical Centrism. This should  
be made absolutely 
clear. It would be extremely damaging to Radical Centrism for there to  be 
any kind of
link made in the public mind between our movement, just getting off the  
ground, and Ron Paul
or his movement. About a number of very important issues Radical Centrism  
and
"Paulista Libertarianism" are diametric opposites.
 
We do not need to be identified with opposition to the state of  Israel.
We do not need to be identified with appeasement of the Islamic Republic  
of  Iran.
We do not need to be identified with racism.
We do not need to be identified with support of same-sex marriage.
We do not need to be identified with opposition to the raid that killed  
Osama bin Laden
 
Granted, in some of these examples, RP uses evasions to mask his positions, 
 for instance
shifting the focus to states rights on the issue of same sex unions, but  
the effect is that
he approves of such arrangements in all states which allow it. In other  
words, his
moral position is immoral  --or no better than amoral.
 
Some of his other views are reasonable enough, like tough border  
enforcement and
repeal of NAFTA. Agree or disagree, these stands are in the ballpark. But  
on issues
of moment the man is a loose cannon and is dangerous.
 
 
Billy Rojas
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
 
 
 
from the site : Ruthfully Yours
 
RON PAUL: A BIGOT UNMASKED BY HIS OWN WORDS 
By _Ruth King_ (http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/author/admin/)  on  December 
18th, 2011  
http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/2011/12/16/who-wrote-the-ron-paul-newsle
tters-ron-paul-wrote-them-clear-proof/ 
***I grant permission to anyone to take the content in this entry and  
redistribute it. The truth needs to get out.***
People wonder who  wrote the Ron Paul newsletters. 
First, if  you’re new to this topic, it’s important because for around  
two decades, he had newsletters written that contained much racist content. He 
 financially profited off of the newsletters. You can read about it more in 
 depth _here_ 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/2011/12/07/ron-paul-is-a-lying-scumbag-politician-with-borderline-sociopath-tendencies/)
  . 
The purpose of this entry is to answer a simple question. 
Who wrote the Ron Paul newsletters? 
In a 1996 interview with the Dallas Morning News, Ron Paul was asked about  
his newsletters. In that interview he defended them. You can read a copy of 
the  interview_ here_ 
(http://www.criticalreactor.com/ronpaul/newsletters/1996_Dallas_Morning_News.html)
 . You can purchase a hard copy of that 
interview _here_ 
(http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DM&p_theme=dm&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&s_hidethis=no&p_field_label-0=Author&p_fiel
d_label-1=title&p_bool_label-1=AND&p_field_label-2=Section&p_bool_label-2=AN
D&s_dispstring=ron%20paul%20AND%20date(05/19/1996%20to%2005/23/1996)&p_field
_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=05/19/1996%20to%2005
/23/1996)&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=("ron%20paul")&p_perpage=10&
p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no) . 
In the interview, he did not deny he made the statement about the swiftness 
 of black men. 
“If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no  
chance to catch them,” Dr. Paul said. 
He also said the comment about black men in the nation’s capital was made  
while writing about a 1992 study produced by the National Center on  
Incarceration and Alternatives, a criminal justice think tank based in  
Virginia. 
Citing statistics from the study, Dr. Paul then concluded in his column:  
`Given the inef! ficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice  
system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in  
that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.” 
“These aren’t my figures,” Dr. Paul said Tuesday. “That is the assumption 
 you can gather from” the report
>From this interview we gather Ron Paul knew about the content, defended the 
 content and wrote the content. 
Before we look at internal evidence, here’s a brief sample of his offensive 
 sayings. 
””We don’t think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of  23. 
That’s true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been  raised 
on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong,  tough, 
scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as  such. 
“Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have  
sensible political opinions,” 
“I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that  
city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal,” 
“we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is  
hardly irrational.”
_Source_ 
(http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl/1996_1343749/campaign-96-u-s-house-newsletter-excerpts-offer-am.html)
  (As if the Paulbots 
care. But hey.)
 Let’s look at some internal evidence.
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/paul1216cc.jpg) 
 
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/paul1216ff.jpg) 
 
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/letters1.jpg)  
>From the above picture we see the newsletter clearly implies it’s written 
in  his name. The arrow points to a sentence that is said in the first 
person. This  would indicate it is Ron Paul writing and not someone else. 
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/letters2.jpg)  
The above picture has another first person reference. Indicating it’s not  
another author. 
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/paul1216a.jpg)  
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/paul1216b.jpg)  
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/letters4.jpg)  
The above includes his signature. Once again indicating he’s doing the  
writing. 
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/letters5.jpg)  
The above footer indicates Ron Paul is the editor of The Ron Paul 
Investment  Letter. 
We have newsletter headings with Ron Paul’s name in bold. There are 
numerous  first person references in the newsletters. A footer has Ron Paul 
listed 
as  editor of The Ron Paul Investment Letter. There is a 1996 interview 
where Ron  Paul defends the newsletters. 
If every newsletter has Ron Paul’s name in big bold writing –  if there  
are overwhelming first person references – if the listed editor for The Ron 
Paul  Investment Letter is Ron Paul – if you have him defending the content 
over and  over again in 1990′s interviews – you have to conclude Ron Paul is 
writing this  stuff. 
Of course now Ron Paul offers _this standard answer_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CoQWAXuUyI&feature=youtu.be) . But we’re not 
stupid. 
 
(http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/paul12162011a.jpg)
  
——
All my evidence comes from these links. Feel free to use it too. 
_Link_ 
(http://www.criticalreactor.com/ronpaul/newsletters/1996_Dallas_Morning_News.html)
  _Link_ 
(http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DM&p_theme=dm&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&s_hidethis=no&p_field_label-0=
Author&p_field_label-1=title&p_bool_label-1=AND&p_field_label-2=Section&p_bo
ol_label-2=AND&s_dispstring=ron%20paul%20AND%20date(05/19/1996%20to%2005/23/
1996)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=05/19/1
996%20to%2005/23/1996)&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=("ron%20paul")&
p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no)  
_Link_ 
(http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/ron-pauls-racist-newsletters-revealed/)
  _Link_ 
(http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/who-wrote-ron-pauls-newsletter)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/angry-white-man)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-plank/who-wrote-ron-pauls-newsletters)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/more-selections-ron-pauls-newsletters)  
_Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/88421/ron-pauls-racism)  _Link_ 
(http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/16/politics/animal/main3721817.shtml)  
_Link_ 
(http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/08/ron-paul-bigot-liar-or-incompetent-fool.html)
  _Link_ 
(http://reason.com/blog/2008/01/11/old-news-rehashed-for-over-a-d)  _Link_ 
(http://www.texasmonthly.com/preview/2001-10-01/feature7)  
_Link_ (http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/April1993_0.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/December1989.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/FreedomApril1978.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/FreedomAugust1983.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/FreedomMay1979.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/InvestmentLetterFeb1992.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/InvestmentLetterApril1988.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/InvestmentLetterMay1988.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/InvestmentOctober1992.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/January1988.pdf) _ Link _ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/January1990.pdf) _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/January1992.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/January1993.pdf) _ 
Link_ (http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/July1990.pdf) _ Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/July1992.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/May1996.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/November1989.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/personalletter.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/November1992.pdf) 
 _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PoliticalReportOctober1992.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PoliticalReportSep1988.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PoliticaReportApril1989.pdf) _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/RRR.pdf) _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/September1994.pdf)  _Link_ 
(http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/September1995.pdf)  
_Link_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW_IT5Zck-o)  _Link_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKBlk1Vpeuw&noredirect=1)  _Link_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_H01fVnhF9U&noredirect=1)  _Link_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de_CSuJCsfY&noredirect=1)

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to