Well, I did vote for McGovern.  I know there will be groans elsewhere on the
list, but it made sense to me at the time.  I never did register as a
Democrat.  Even then, affiliating with a party seemed too restrictive to me.
I came from a mixed family... Mom's side union-pin Democrat, Dad's side
Chicago-style-politics Republican.

 

Chris

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 11:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RC] Party Registration Dems- 42 million Reps- 30 million
Indies- 24...

 

That's a surprise. I mistook you for a youthful Democrat. That's what I was,

a registered Democrat except for a few years in my 20s when, still a
registered

Democrat, I was a member of YPSL   -Norman Thomas supporter, Young Peoples

Socialist League. Very anti-Communist. But if this was today, YPSL if it
still existed

in its early 60s form, would be pro-Bernie Sanders.

 

Anyway, I dropped out of the Democratic Party some time in the 1980s, can't
remember

exactly when. By 1992, while I cringed whenever he opened his mouth, I
supported Perot.

Have been a registered Indy here in Oregon ever since 1999 when I relocated
from Arizona. 

I still think that Bernie is a good man when it comes to defense of the
working man and 

lower income people but the SP on social / values issues has become , for
me, 

complete anathema. 

 

Billy

 

===================================================

 

 

 

 

12/23/2011 10:28:46 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:

I am way ahead of the curve.  I have been independent all of my life, except
one brief Republican stint when one of my former employees ran for congress
and needed votes in his first primary (he won and eventually became
Governor).

 

As far as trends for the general elections, I wouldn't read much into the
relative numbers.  I think North Carolina elections director Gary Bartlett
is right, "whoever is attractive to the unaffiliated voter."  

 

Chris 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 11:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [RC] Party Registration Dems- 42 million Reps- 30 million Indies-
24 million

 

Dec 23, 2011

 

USA  TODAY


Voters leaving Republican, Democratic parties in droves


By Richard Wolf, USA TODAY


 

WASHINGTON - More than 2.5 million voters have left the Democratic and
Republican parties since the 2008 elections, while the number of independent
voters continues to grow.

 

A  USA TODAY analysis of state voter registration statistics shows
registered Democrats declined in 25 of the 28 states that register voters by
party. Republicans dipped in 21 states, while independents increased in 18
states. 

The trend is acute in states that are key to next year's presidential race.
In the eight swing states that register voters by party, Democrats'
registration is down by 800,000 and Republicans' by 350,000. Independents
have gained 325,000.

*       The pattern continues a decades-long trend that has seen a
diminution in the power of political parties, giving rise to independents as
Ross Perot
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/People/Business,+Science+and+Techn
ology+Figures/Ross+Perot>  and Ralph Nader
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/People/Activists/Ralph+Nader>  and
the popularity this year of libertarian Republican Ron Paul.

"The strident voices of both the left and the right have sort of soured
people from saying willingly that they belong to one party or the other,"
says Doug Lewis <http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Doug+Lewis> , who
represents state elections officials. "If both sides call each other
scurrilous dogs, then the public believes that both sides are probably
scurrilous dogs."

Registered Democrats still dominate the political playing field with more
than 42 million voters, compared to 30 million Republicans and 24 million
independents. But Democrats have lost the most - 1.7 million, or 3.9%, from
2008.

Democratic registration has fared worse than Republicans in Colorado,
Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Places,+Geography/States,+Territor
ies,+Provinces,+Islands/U.S.+States/New+Hampshire> , New Mexico
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Places,+Geography/States,+Territor
ies,+Provinces,+Islands/U.S.+States/New+Mexico> , North Carolina
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Places,+Geography/States,+Territor
ies,+Provinces,+Islands/U.S.+States/North+Carolina>  and Pennsylvania - the
eight swing states with party registration. Republican losses are biggest in
Nevada, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania.

The decline is due to a variety of factors. People move, people die, people
revolt in disgust. Many are stripped from registration rolls by states
seeking to remove inactive voters.

By contrast, the number of independents has grown for years and is up more
than 400,000 since 2008, or 1.7%. States with big gains: Colorado, Florida,
North Carolina - and Arizona, a possible target for President Obama in 2012
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/2012> .

The 2012 winner, says North Carolina elections director Gary Bartlett
<http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Gary+Bartlett> , will be "whoever
is attractive to the unaffiliated voter."

 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to