Why the Egyptian People Are Choosing  Islamists
Tawfik Hamid ("Newsmax.com," December 23, 2011) 
Cairo, Egypt - The overwhelming victory for Islamists in the first stage of 
 the Egyptian elections deserves closer examination. 
Careful analysis of the situation in Egypt reveals that the selection of  
Islamist parties was due to a number of factors: 
Desire to implement Sharia rules in the country. Several polls suggest that 
a  significant number of Egyptians want to implement Sharia rules within 
the  country. 
The overwhelming number of women who have been wearing the Hijab (Islamic  
head scarf) and the Niquab (face cover) in recent decades provides a clear  
indication of the degree that religious fervor has spread among the  
population. 
As many as 80 percent of all women are thought to be wearing the 
traditional  Hijab. 
This also correlates well with the percentage of votes attained by Islamist 
 groups in the recent elections (around 70 percent). 
The desire to implement Sharia law is partially based on the slogan of the  
Muslim Brotherhood (MB) that “Islam is the Solution” which gives hope for 
many  Muslims that implementing Sharia law will magically solve all the 
problems in  the country (Note: Failure of the MB, in Egypt, to fix the 
economic 
problems of  the country can be the biggest blow to political Islam in 
history). 
Desire to have less corruption. Some Egyptians supported the MB with the 
hope  that it will be less corrupt than the Mubarak regime. 
During my recent visit to Egypt, after the revolution, several 
non-religious  Egyptians expressed their desire to elect members of the MB 
because they 
viewed  religious ties as being “not corrupt.” 
Financial penalty associated with failing to participate. Some Egyptians 
told  local TV stations that they participated in the elections to avoid 
paying a fine  of 500 Egyptian pounds. 
These tend to be simple people and easy prey for well-organized Islamist  
groups, who use the word “Islam” to motivate voters. 
Feelings of guilt. When I attended the Medical School of Cairo (1978-1984)  
the Jammaa Islameia (Islamic Group) used to win student union elections. 
Several Muslim students who were not religious at all supported members of  
Jamma Islameia because they felt guilty for not meeting the religious 
edicts of  Islam (such as the five daily prayers). 
In their view, choosing an Islamic group was a good deed they could use to  
compensate for a lack of piousness. 
Desire for change. Some Egyptians explained their support of Islamist 
parties  as way to try something new. 
In their view, Egypt had already tried socialism (Nasser), Capitalism  
(Sadat), and free market enterprise (Mubarak) with poor results. 
Accordingly, they believe that an Islamic system might bring prosperity. 
This reminds me of someone who has lived in pain for a number of years, 
only  to consider an experimental treatment. 
In the case of voters, this is really more about past failures than a 
genuine  desire and confidence in the new approach. 
Increased crime. Some Egyptians said they have been living in fear since 
the  Jan. 25 revolution following an increase in crime. 
Many Egyptians feel that the tough criminal laws of Sharia can help control 
 the streets and restore a sense of security. 
Lack of trust in current leadership. The failure to put Mubarak and his 
wife  in prison and their “five-star” treatment by authorities was perceived 
by many  Egyptians as misplaced loyalty. 
This included destruction of a CD recording containing a communication  
between the president and his top officials during the revolution. This was  
considered the ONLY evidence that could prove that Mubarak ordered the killing 
 of demonstrators. 
Consequently there was a feeling that Mubarak will face punishment under an 
 Islamic system. 
Ignorance. Many people chose the symbol of “balance” used by the MB while 
not  necessarily knowing which political party it represented. 
Some people even said they were told to look for this particular symbol. 
Nefarious tactics. These include: 
Bribing voters with food and even money in some cases. 
Defaming secularism by saying that it goes “against Islam” and that it 
would  encourage nudity and prostitution. 
Breaking election laws by promoting Islamic parties during the 48 hours 
that  preceded election day. 
Illegally using mosques and Islam to promote political parties. 
Failure to understand the consequences of implementing Sharia laws. Some  
Egyptians believe that Sharia laws will bring “blessings’ and prosperity to 
the  country. 
Fear of Punishment by Allah. Many Egyptian Muslims feel that Allah will  
punish them if they do not choose an ‘Islamic’ party, as Allah will see this 
as  rejection of religion. 
Weakness of secular and liberal parties. Secular and liberal parties 
suffered  from a number of fundamental weaknesses that limited their 
effectiveness: 
Fewer financial resources. 
Lack of street presence (unlike the Islamists who have been providing food  
and health services for the poor). 
Inability to effectively counter the Islamist message. 
Misplaced focus on the SCAF (who are seculars) rather than dispelling 
radical  Islamic views.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to