Media Relations /  U of O
 
 
A new theory emerges for where some fish became four-limbed  creatures
 
 
 
 
(http://uonews.uoregon.edu/sites/all/files/uonews/uploads/images/desert-flooded.jpg)
 EUGENE, Ore. -- (Dec. 27, 2011) -- A small fish  crawling on 
stumpy limbs from a shrinking desert pond is an icon of can-do  spirit, 
emblematic of a leading theory for the evolutionary transition between  fish 
and 
amphibians. This theorized image of such a drastic adaptation to  changing 
environmental conditions, however, may, itself, be evolving into a new  picture.

University of Oregon scientist _Gregory J. Retallack_ 
(http://pages.uoregon.edu/dogsci/doku.php?id=directory/faculty/greg/about) , 
professor of 
geological sciences, says  that his discoveries at numerous sites in Maryland, 
New 
York and Pennsylvania  suggest that "such a plucky hypothetical ancestor of 
ours probably could not  have survived the overwhelming odds of perishing in 
a trek to another shrinking  pond."

This scenario comes from the late Devonian, about 390 million  years ago to 
roughly 360 million years ago. Paleontologist Alfred Romer, who  died in 
1973 after serving on the faculties at the University of Chicago and  Harvard 
University, saw this time as a period of struggle and escape -- and  
important in fish-tetrapod transition -- to ensure survival.

 
(http://uonews.uoregon.edu/sites/all/files/uonews/uploads/images/Greg-Retallack.jpg)
 Reporting in the May 2011 issue of the Journal of  Geology, 
Retallack, who also is co-director of paleontological collections at  the UO's 
Museum of Natural and Cultural History, argues for a very different  
explanation. He examined numerous buried soils in rocks yielding footprints and 
 
bones of early transitional fossils between fish and amphibians of Devonian and 
 
Carboniferous geological age. What he found raises a major challenge to 
Romer's  theory.

"These transitional fossils were not associated with drying ponds  or 
deserts, but consistently were found with humid woodland soils," he said.  
"Remains of drying ponds and desert soils also are known and are littered with  
fossil fish, but none of our distant ancestors. Judging from where their 
fossils  were found, transitional forms between fish and amphibians lived in 
wooded  floodplains. Our distant ancestors were not so much foolhardy, as 
opportunistic,  taking advantage of floodplains and lakes choked with roots and 
logs for the  first time in geological history."

Limbs proved handy for negotiating  woody obstacles, and flexible necks 
allowed for feeding in shallow water,  Retallack said. By this new woodland 
hypothesis, the limbs and necks, which  distinguish salamanders from fish, did 
not arise from reckless adventure in  deserts, but rather were nurtured by a 
newly evolved habitat of humid, wooded  floodplains.

The findings, he said, dampen both the desert hypothesis of  Romer and a 
newer inter-tidal theory put forth by Grzegorz Niedbwiedzki and  colleagues at 
the University of Warsaw. In 2010, they published their discovery  of 
eight-foot-long, 395-million-year-old tetrapods in ancient lagoonal mud in  
southeastern Poland, where Retallack also has been studying fossil soils with  
Polish colleague Marek Narkeiwicz.

"Ancient soils and sediments at sites  for transitional fossils around the 
world are critical for understanding when  and under what conditions fish 
first walked," Retallack said. "The Darwin fish  of chrome adorning many car 
trunks represents a particular time and place in the  long evolutionary 
history of life on earth." 
UO Academic Support Funds supported Retallack's  research.

About the University of Oregon
The  University of Oregon is among the 108 institutions chosen from 4,633 
U.S.  universities for top-tier designation of "Very High Research Activity" 
in the  2010 Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. 
The UO also is  one of two Pacific Northwest members of the Association of 
American  Universities


-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to