"The problem is the "I've got mine and screw everyone else" effect"

This effect may well be the prime cause of human missery. The point
seems to be: To what extent are we part of the problem, to what extent
part of the solution.

I wish you a healthy and creative 2012.

Walther Micke

On 31 dec 2011, 14:22, [email protected] wrote:
> There is only so much even the most well endowed religious charity can
> accomplish.
> Basically they can help a small class of people extensively, like unwed
> mothers
> or orphans, but when it comes to large classes of people, like the
> unemployed
> in times of economic crisis, all that really is possible are food  boxes
> and maybe spare clothing or bus fare.
>
> The problem is the "I've got mine and screw everyone else" effect  which
> self-reliance theories promote even as they also promote self  reliance.
> This effect works directly against religious values and if the
> self-reliance
> philosophy is strong enough it over-rides religion.
>
> The problem is made worse when many people ( not a majority, but too many  )
> take advantage of the system and won't work even when they can, or like
> some
> women, have babies as a source of welfare income --which everyone  else
> pays for.  The Left is generous with the money of the working  class,
> the Right is unable to comprehend that its bromides for dealing
> with large scale social needs are ridiculously inadequate.
>
> This is the  dilemma.
>
> Billy
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 12/31/2011 2:00:24 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected]  writes:
>
> P.S. The  actual development of catholic charities make a topical
> question of the  relationship between private and government charity
> programs.
>
> On 31  dec, 09:38, cornucopianow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello  David,
>
> > Just like you I would prefer charity by private  organisations.
> > Of course the charities do a good job. But the position  of the
> > churches in the 1800's was  another one as it is today as  well was
> > that of the goverment. Or would you prefer to return to the  1800's?
> > Nowadays the churches may not be ale to embetter the situation  of the
> > poor as much as would be desirable and in my opinion there is a  task
> > for the government here also. But I realize that the postion of  the
> > churches in the Netherlands may be another on than that in the  United
> > States.
>
> > Have a nice day,
>
> >  Walther
>
> > On 28 dec, 21:29, "David R. Block"  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >  Hello Walther,
>
> > > Good to have a name other than Mr or Ms  Anonymous. :-)
>
> > > Communism lite refers to what it sounded  like to me. I can always
> change
> > > my mind.
>
> > > The  quote from Von Hayek appears on all of my e-mail, until I decide to
> >  > change it. Other alternatives are available from Neal Boortz,  Gerald
> > > Ford, Winston Churchill, Benjamin Franklin, Barry  Goldwater, Robert A.
> > > Heinlein, Thomas Jefferson, P. J. O'Rourke,  Ronald Reagan, Ringo Starr,
> > > Mark Twain, and Will Rogers. And von  Hayek's family moved to the US
> > > because of the Nazis, not the  Communists, although "escaping Tyranny"
> > > would fit either  one.
>
> > > They are for entertainment purposes, mostly.  Although one is slipping
> in
> > > here below because it seems  appropriate.
>
> > > More below.
>
> > >  David
>
> > > “A society that does not recognize that each  individual has values of
> > > his own which he is entitled to follow  can have no respect for the
> > > dignity of the individual and cannot  really know freedom.--Fredrich
> > > August von Hayek*
>
> >  > On 12/28/2011 9:09 AM, cornucopianow wrote:
>
> > > >  Dear Mr. Block,
>
> > > > "Communism lite" refers to a  non-existent society. It is certainly
> not
> > > > a society which  the Civil Manifesto advocates.
>
> > > > The quote of von  Hayek  presumably refers to Soviet Russia. It does
> > > > not  apply to a society based on the Civil Manifesto
>
> > > > -  "Their existence is not my responsibility". Mr. Block would you
> like
> >  > > to live on a society in which thousands of children have no
> >  > > satistactory food as is the case in the Netherlands and certainly  is
> > > > the case in Great Britain? I would rather  not.
>
> > > DRB: I give to my church for a food program for the  homeless. It may
> not
> > > (definitely not) make it to the UK or The  Netherlands, but surely
> > > someone in the UK or The Netherlands can  give to their local charities.
> > > No? I don't think that the  government needs to be operating charities.
> > > This used to be done  by churches in the 1800s, and i don't really
> > > consider it  "progress" to move it to the government. Doing that runs
> > > square  into a problem noted by P. J. O'Rourke:
>
> > > "There is no  virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no
> > > virtue  in advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring"
> > >  and "sensitive" because he wants to expand the government's charitable
> >  > programs is merely saying that he's willing to try to do good with
> other
> > > people's money. Well, who isn't? And a voter who takes  pride in
> > > supporting such programs is telling us that he'll do  good with his own
> > > money -- if a gun is held to his head."*--P. J.  O'Rourke*
>
> > > DRB: Charity, under pain of IRS Audit, really  isn't that charitable.
>
> > > > -The idea is not a mandatory  retirement but to guarantee a decent
> > > > period of retirement  for everybody. Of course many people ccan
> deliver
> > > > their  contributions until old age.
>
> > > > -Unemployment should be  as short as possible. The employment benefits
> > > > should not  hinder returning to the workforce.
>
> > > > -I have to study  the savings and loan debacle to see what actually
> > > > happened.  Meant is a maximum mortgage of 400.000 dollars.
>
> > >  DRB: There was a lot of non-existent property on the books of many
> >  > Savings and Loans. Undeveloped developments (Clinton's Whitewater)
> were
> > > carried on the books as having been developed, bogus oil  rigs were on
> > > the books in Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Texas, and  general shenanigans
> > > prevailed pretty much nationwide. $400,000 is  a fantastic amount for a
> > > mortgage in Dallas, TX, but kind of low  for Hollywood.
>
> > > > -I think that affordable health care  for everybody is possible
> without
> > > > a giant government  department.
>
> > > DRB: I think that a giant government  department is what we are going to
> > > wind up with. And with the  corruption evidenced by the US government at
> > > this time, that's  not a good thing.
>
> > > > -I am very sorry for your  daughter. It must be a very demotivating
> > > > experience for her.  It would take more space to analyse the situation
> > > > in  which this happens. The factors which are responsible for this
> > >  > outcome should be removed.
>
> > > DRB: That would be  "advisers" at the Universities that she attended,
> who
> > > obviously  have some bias towards encouraging continued enrollment-even
> > > if  the student cannot afford it-THEY need the money, coupled with an
> > >  economy in the dumper. Kind of hard to remove that last factor. I'm
> not
> > > exactly in favor of encouraging a college degree just for the  sake of
> > > encouraging a college degree. Same thing with a Master's  degree, which
> > > is where the debt was incurred. Somebody is really  "dumbing down" the
> > > bachelor's degrees if everything requires a  Master's.
>
> > > > -The exploration of mineral energy seems  to have a lot of
> > > > disadvantages. The fostering of green  energy is a good idea.
> > > > -You are welcome! The idea of the  Civil Manifesto is not to specify
> > > > the diet of whoever may  be. The idea is that shifting the balance
> from
> > > > meat to plant  is advantageous for the wellbeing of society.
>
> > > DRB: As  long as they are not about to go bankrupt (Solyndra), I would
> > >  like to support it. Sadly, most of the green initiatives that the
> > >  current administration has chosen to promote seem to be chosen based
> >  > more upon their campaign contributions than their financial stability
> or
> > > even the marketability of their products and  ideas.
>
> > > > Thank you for your comments. You are the  first one who reacts to the
> > > > Civil Manifesto. I whish your  daughter may soon find an occupation
> > > > which matches her  education.
>
> > > DRB: Well, I would hope so,  too.
>
> > > > Sincerely,
>
> > > > Walther  Micke- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> > >  - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -- Tekst uit
>
> oorspronkelijk  bericht niet weergeven -
>
>
>
> > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht  weergeven -
>
> --
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group:  http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and  blog:http://RadicalCentrism.org- Tekst uit 
> oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to