He'd go on with his usual libertarianism: using the facts when they help him, followed by hasty generalizations and other rhetorical fallacies when the facts aren't in his favor; all to further a single predetermined end.
In this case, Paul would simply say that firework control isn't a duty of the government, he'd follow with: "why are we telling 'law-abiding' adults that they can't do things?", and to the inevitable next question about children and fireworks: "why would any caring parent let their children play with dangerous fireworks?". On Jan 3, 11:42 am, cornucopianow <[email protected]> wrote: > My prayer has been answered immediately. Today my newspaper published > an editorial about the necessity of stricter regulation for the > fireworks-market (on the average 700 casualties at the turn of the > year). And...also today a long article about Ron Paul and the caucus > in Iowa. (Both will have been quite unknown in the Netherlands until > recently). More and more political parties in the Netherlands change > over to let their members choose their own leaders now. I wonder what > Paul says about fireworks. > > Walther Micke -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
