There you go again, practicing up to become a copy editor.
 
Billy  
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
1/9/2012 7:30:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected]  
writes:

Let's see, China may be going down in a recession,  Europe is a basket 
case, Japan is in debt past its eyeballs, and we're trying  to join them. 

That guy Murphy sure has been busy. He can stop any time  now...

David

  _   
 
“A society that does  not recognize that each individual has values of his 
own which he is entitled  to follow can have no respect for the dignity of 
the individual and cannot  really know freedom.”—Fredrich August von Hayek  



On 1/9/2012 10:55 AM,  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  


Real Clear Politics
 
 
January 9, 2012  
China's Coming Slump?
By _Robert Samuelson_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?author=Robert+Samuelson&id=14456) 

WASHINGTON -- Even China? Could the world's economic juggernaut, having  
grown an average of 10 percent annually for three decades, face a slowdown  or 
what for China would be a recession? Does it have a real estate "bubble"  
about to "pop"? What would be the global consequences? Treasury Secretary  
Timothy Geithner visits China and Japan this week. These questions form a  
backdrop. With Europe's slump and America's sluggish economy, a sizable  
Chinese slowdown would be bad news. 
China inspires ambivalence. Its policies -- especially its undervalued  
exchange rate -- are skewed to give it an advantage on world markets. This  has 
cost jobs in the United States, Europe and developing countries. Still,  
China is now such a powerful economic force that an abrupt slowdown would  
ripple beyond its borders. Trade would suffer. China's protectionism might  
intensify to offset job loss. If surpluses of steel and other commodities  were 
dumped on world markets, prices and production elsewhere would  fall.

 
There are warning signs. Economist Nicholas Lardy of the Peterson  
Institute cites three. First, Europe's slump has weakened China's trade;  
Europe 
buys about a fifth of its exports. Second, housing is showing signs  of a 
bubble and is deflating. Finally, China's government will have a harder  time 
deploying a stimulus than during the 2008-09 financial crisis.  Government debt 
rose from 26 percent of gross domestic product in 2007 to 43  percent of 
GDP in 2010. 
How all this affects China's growth is controversial. "Most likely, China  
will have a soft landing," says Justin Yifu Lin, the World Bank's chief  
economist. "Growth goes to 8 percent or 8.5 percent." That's down from about  9 
percent in 2011. Government debt is still low enough to permit ample  
stimulus, Lin thinks. Many forecasts agree. 
But skepticism is mounting. The Japanese securities firm Nomura sees a  
one-in-three possibility of a "hard landing" -- a drop in growth to 5  percent 
or less. To Americans, now experiencing annual economic growth  around 2 
percent, this may seem fabulous. But for China's modernizing  economy and huge 
labor force, a 5 percent growth rate would raise  unemployment and social 
discontent. The adverse GDP swing would roughly  equal the U.S. decline in the 
2007-09 recession. 
Housing may settle who's right. China has vastly overinvested in housing,  
argues Lardy in a new book ("Sustaining China's Economic Growth After the  
Global Financial Crisis"). The main reason, he says, is that financial  
policies prevent savers from realizing adequate returns on their money. The  
stock market is seen as rigged. Government regulations keep interest rates  on 
bank deposits -- the main outlet for savings -- low. From 2004 to 2010,  they 
were less than inflation. Frustrated savers invest in housing, where  
prices are not regulated. 
The result seems a classic speculative bubble. People buy because they  
believe prices will go up; and prices go up because people buy. A 2010  survey 
found that 18 percent of Beijing households owned two or more  properties; 
another 2010 survey of all cities found that 40 percent of  purchases were 
for investment. Many units, Lardy reports, are vacant because  rents in 
Beijing, Shanghai and other major cities are low. 
Unfortunately, booms breed busts. Buyers ultimately recognize that rising  
prices reflect artificial demand. Purchases slow. Prices fall. New building  
declines. The process feeds on itself. With modest imbalances, the result 
is  a correction. Otherwise, there's a crash. 
Which does China face? A popped real estate bubble could exert a big  drag. 
Housing construction exceeds 10 percent of GDP. That's historically  high, 
says Lardy. At a similar stage of economic development, Taiwan's  housing 
investment was 4.3 percent of GDP. In the recent U.S. real estate  boom, 
housing peaked at 6 percent of GDP. In China, housing stimulates much  consumer 
spending (furniture, appliances) and accounts for 40 percent of  steel 
production, notes Lardy. Land sales are also a big revenue source for  local 
governments. All would suffer from a housing bust. 
There are mitigating factors. Outside Beijing and Shanghai, it's unclear  
that housing prices are "out of line with household income growth," says  
economist Eswar Prasad of Cornell University. Chinese buyers also typically  
make large cash payments for their properties. Compared to United States, a  
housing bust is less likely to become a banking crisis as mortgages  sour. 
Whatever happens, China's economic model is reaching its limits, as Lardy  
argues. It has relied on exports, promoted through the controlled exchange  
rate, and investment, including housing, subsidized by cheap credit.  
Meanwhile, Chinese savers have been punished by the low returns on deposits.  
This 
dampens their incomes and consumption spending. The trouble is that the  
global slowdown threatens exports and housing's excesses threaten  investment. 
Unless China can switch to stronger consumption spending, its  economy will 
slow -- or it will achieve growth by becoming even more  predatory toward 
other countries.  
 
Copyright 2011, Washington Post Writers  Group





-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to