There are many prominent church fathers.  You won't find many more hard
working nose-to-the-grindstone guys than, say, John Calvin.

 

Humility in a Christian sense does not mean being passive or being lazy
waiting for manna to fall from heaven.  

 

I agree that we have to take responsibility for ourselves.  I add to your
thought expressed below the achievement of an optimal state.  Humility
allows for the notion that an optimal state can be enhanced by a spiritual
awareness of direction provided from God.  

 

Chris

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Gonzalez
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 7:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RC] On humility

 

I quoted the preeminent church father himself, St. Thomas Aquinas. If we let
God work through us for food, then we starve to death. At some point, we
have to take responsibility for ourselves, whether that be to find
sustenance or create the optimal state.



On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Chris Hahn <[email protected]> wrote:

Mike,

You are missing the Christian definition of humble that Ernie referenced.
It is not about submitting to one's superior in an old British sense of
social class; rather, it is about listening to God.  If we presume to tell
God what is in our best interest, then we are lacking humility.  Arrogance
is the presumption that we can usurp the infinite intelligence of God with
our human will.  Humility allows God to work through us for a higher
purpose.  Ernie can probably elaborate more eloquently.

One thing is clear in our discussion today... words matter.  If the terms
progressive or humility have loaded meanings that distract the casual reader
from the true message, then we need to find better words.

Chris






-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 5:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [RC] On humility

Aristotle placed pride as the proper mean between humility and vanity. Why
not fulfill our agenda with pride? One of central pieces of our ideology is
that we freely usurp parts of anything right, but that doesn't mean that we
need to fight placidly, as if we're only borrowing the truth. A certain
sense of purpose in implementation is a virtue, even if we aren't the 'true
believer' type.

Keep in mind St. Thomas Aquinas' definition of humility, that it "consists
in keeping oneself within one's own bounds, not reaching out to things above
one, but submitting to one's superior." Is that really what we want to be-
people who submit themselves to servitude?

--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to