attackerman.firedoglake.com
_“Radical centrism”, like the tooth fairy or  Detox, is a myth_ 
(http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2010/04/26/radical-centrism-like-the-tooth-fairy-or
-detox-is-a-myth/) 

     
_Radical centrism”, like the tooth fairy or Detox, is  a myth_ 
(http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2010/04/26/radical-centrism-like-the-tooth-fairy-or-d
etox-is-a-myth/) 
By: _Jamelle Bouie_ (http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/author/jbouie/)   
Monday April 26, 2010
 
By: _Jamelle Bouie_ (http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/author/jbouie/)   
Monday April 26, 2010
 
Hello Attackerman readers, and thanks to Spencer for letting me hang  out 
here for a few days. It’s always a pleasure.  
While Tom Friedman’s reading of the Tea Party Movement is hilariously wrong 
—  a movement of GOP stalwarts isn’t going to embrace anything “green” — 
it isn’t  the worst thing about _his column_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/opinion/25friedman.html)   today in the New 
York Times. Those honors 
belong to this passage, where he  extolls the “radical centrism” of Senators 
Kerry, Graham and Lieberman: 
 
Yes, I know, dream on. The Tea Party is heading to the hard libertarian  
right and would never support an energy bill that puts a fee on carbon. 
So if there is going to be a Green Tea Party, it will have to emerge from a 
 different place — the radical center, a center committed to a radical  
departure from business as usual. Acting on that impulse, Senators John Kerry,  
Lindsey Graham and Joseph Lieberman had forged a bipartisan  
climate/energy/jobs bill that deserves an energetic centrist Green Tea Party  
to support 
it. 
This critical piece of energy legislation was supposed to be unveiled by  
the three senators on Monday, but it was suddenly postponed late Saturday  
because of Senator Graham’s fury that the Senate Democratic leader, Harry Reid 
 of Nevada, and the White House were planning to take up a highly 
controversial  immigration measure before the energy bill.

The term “radical centrism” is absolutely incoherent. The New Oxford 
American  Dictionary _defines  radical_ 
(http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/SEARCH_RESULTS.html?y=0&q=radical&category=t183&x=0&ssid=785776012&scope=book&ti
me=0.930407100268489)  as “relating to or affecting the fundamental nature 
of something;  far-reaching or thorough.” Which, incidentally, is the 
precise opposite of  “centrism.” For centrists, public policy is only “good” 
when it offers a  concrete benefits to existing stakeholders and entrenched 
interests. By and  large, centrism is an ideology of the status quo, and 
centrists are most  concerned with maintaining existing institutional 
arrangements. Reform is rarely  pursued, and then, only when it can be achieved 
through 
tepid incrementalism  (the exception, of course, being wars and defense 
spending).  
But even if “radical centrism” were a real thing and not nonsense prettied 
up  by the gloss of a New York Times column, it’s still the case that 
Friedman’s  praise is completely misplaced. Senators Kerry, Graham and 
Lieberman 
are  consummate insiders. Indeed, this is why its even possible for a  
climate bill to move forward; each has intimate knowledge of the players  
involved and the experience necessary to navigate their concerns. Pace  
Friedman, 
there is absolutely _nothing  radical_ 
(http://views.washingtonpost.com/climate-change/post-carbon/2010/04/by_juliet_eilperin_the_nations.html)
  about 
the Kerry-Graham-Lieberman proposal; it provides $10 billion  to the coal 
industry for “clean coal technology” and has garnered support from  “the nation’
s largest electric utilities association and three of the country’s  
biggest oil companies.” Of course, that’s not to say that the bill isn’t  good 
— 
tepid incrementalism is the only real option we have for moving  the ball 
forward — but radical it isn’t. 
Like I said at the beginning of this post though, “radical centrism” is a  
complete contradiction in terms, and it would please me to no end to see 
the  phrase mocked, denounced and completely excised from political dialogue.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to