Real Clear Politics
 
 
March 6, 2012  
James Q. Wilson (1931-2012)
By _Thomas  Sowell_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?author=Thomas+Sowell&id=14502) 

There are undoubtedly many people who are alive today because of James Q.  
Wilson, who died last week. He was not a doctor or medical scientist, nor 
was he  a fireman or coast guardsman who rescued people from immediate 
dangers. 
James Q. Wilson was a scholar who studied crime. He saved lives because his 
 penetrating analyses of crime, and the effect of the criminal law, 
debunked the  theories of other intellectuals, which had led judges and 
legislators 
to ease up  on criminals -- leading in turn to skyrocketing rates of crime, 
including  murder.

 
Prior to 1960, murder rates in the United States had been going down for  
decades. Even the absolute number of murders declined, while the population 
grew  by millions. Despite the addition of two new states -- Hawaii and Alas
ka -- in  1960, the number of murders in the 50 states was less than it had 
been in the 48  states thirty years earlier. 
The murder rate in 1960 was just under half of what it had been in 1934. 
But that was not good enough for the intelligentsia, with their theories on 
 how to "solve" our "problems." First of all, they claimed, we had to stop  
focusing on punishment and get at the "root causes" of crime. In other 
words, we  had to solve the criminals' problems, in order to solve the problem 
of  crime. 
This approach was not new in the 1960s. In fact, it went back at least as 
far  as the 18th century. But what was new in the 1960s was the widespread 
acceptance  of such notions in the legal system, including the Supreme Court 
of the United  States. 
The crusade against punishment, and especially capital punishment, spread  
through all three branches of the federal government and into state 
governments  as well. Even a murderer caught in the act had so many new 
"rights," 
created out  of thin air by judges, that executing him could require a decade 
or more of  additional litigation, even after he was found guilty. 
The best-known product of this 1960s revolution in the criminal law was the 
 famous Miranda warning, "You have the right to remain silent," etc. It is 
as if  we are engaged in some kind of sporting contest with the criminal, 
and must give  him a chance to beat the rap, even when he is guilty. 
In the aftermath of this revolution in the criminal law, promoted by the  
intelligentsia in academia and in the media, the long downward trend in 
murder  suddenly reversed. By 1974, the murder rate was more than twice what it 
had been  in 1961. Between 1960 and 1976, a citizen's chances of becoming a 
victim of a  major violent crime tripled. So did the murder of policemen. 
People clever with words sought all sorts of ways of denying the obvious 
fact  that the fancy new developments in the criminal law were 
catastrophically  counterproductive. That was when James Q. Wilson's writings 
on crime 
burst upon  the scene, cutting through all the fancy evasions with hard facts 
and hard  logic. 
The idea that crime results from poverty, or can be reduced by alleviating  
poverty, Professor Wilson shot down by pointing out that "crime rose the 
fastest  in this country at a time when the number of persons living in 
poverty or  squalor was declining." He said, "I have yet to see a 'root cause' 
or 
to  encounter a government program that has successfully attacked it." 
Nor did Wilson buy the argument that unemployment drove people to crime or  
welfare. He noted that "the work force was at an all-time high at the same 
time  as were the welfare rolls." Nor were minorities frozen out of this 
economy. By  1969, "the nonwhite unemployment rate had fallen to 6.5 percent," 
he pointed  out. 
By systematically confronting the prevailing notions and rhetoric with  
undeniable facts to the contrary, James Q. Wilson began to wear away the  
prevailing social dogmas of intellectuals behind the counterproductive changes  
in law and society. It was much like water wearing away rock -- slowly but  
continually. 
The common sense that had once produced and sustained declining crime rates 
 began to reappear, here and there, in the criminal justice system and 
sometimes  prevailed. Murder rates began to decline again. James Q. Wilson was 
the leader  in this fight. He said, "We have trifled with the wicked." 
There is no way to know which ones of us are alive today because of his 
work.  But we all owe him a debt of  gratitude. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to