from the site :
Science Nordic
 
 
 
The Earth has lost a quarter of its water
 
 
 
 
 
March 13, 2012 






 
 
 


 
 
In its early history, the Earth's oceans contained  significantly more 
water than they do today. A new study indicates that hydrogen  from split water 
molecules has escaped into space.


 
 
 




 


 
By: _Sybille  Hildebrandt_ 
(http://sciencenordic.com/content/sybille-hildebrandt) 
 
 

 
 
The early oceans had a deuterium/hydrogen ratio that was 0.03  smaller 
compared to today’s oceans. This finding can be used to show that back  in time 
there was more water on Earth than today. (Photo:Colourbox)

Although water covers 70 percent of the Earth's surface, water is actually 
a  rare substance that represents just 0.05 percent of the Earth's total 
mass. 
Water has nevertheless played a crucial role in the emergence of life on  
Earth. Without water, the Earth would in all likelihood be a dead planet. 
The amount of water on the planet has not always been the same, however. A  
research group at the Natural History Museum of Denmark has discovered this 
by  measuring how hydrogen isotope ratios in the oceans have changed over 
time. 
"The water that covered the Earth at the dawn of time contained more of the 
 lighter hydrogen isotope than the heavier hydrogen isotope, known as 
deuterium,  than it does today,” says Emily Pope, a post doc, who has played a 
central role  in the study. 
“By examining how the ratio of these isotopes has changed, we have been 
able  to determine that over the course of around four billion years, the 
Earth's  oceans have lost about a quarter of their original mass." 
Geological clues in Greenland
Pope and her colleagues found their path to discovery in a mineral called  
serpentine. 
Serpentine is formed when the Earth's crust comes into contact with 
seawater  circulating at high temperature through channels and cracks in the 
Earth's crust  beneath the seabed.

 
The isotope ratios in serpentine are determined by the isotope ratios in 
the  sea water at the time the mineral was formed, and this information can be 
used  to form a picture of what the oceans were like aeons ago. 
Serpentine is a relatively commonly occurring mineral, but the researchers  
chose to look in the Isua Belt in western Greenland where some of the 
Earth's  oldest rocks were formed, 3.8 billion years ago. 
In 2010, Emily Pope, together with colleagues Minik Rosing and Dennis K. 
Bird  went to a part of Isua, previously identified as being an ancient seabed 
rich in  serpentine, to collect samples. 
Hydrogen floats off into space
Rock samples were taken from the area and subsequently analysed in a  
laboratory at Stanford University in California, USA. 
Tests revealed a significantly higher ratio of hydrogen to deuterium than 
is  seen today. 
The explanation, according to Emily Pope, is that when the Earth was in its 
 infancy, part of the water in the oceans was split into hydrogen, 
deuterium and  oxygen via a process called methanogenesis. Both hydrogen and 
deuterium are  low-density gases, so they rose through the atmosphere and 
eventually floated  off into space. 
Methanogenesis works more efficiently for hydrogen  than for deuterium, so 
more hydrogen gas was created by this process than  deuterium gas, and this 
slowly but surely altered the ratio of these isotopes in  the oceans.
 
Knowing how much hydrogen had disappeared from the oceans over the last 
four  billion years enabled the researchers to calculate that the oceans have 
lost  about a quarter of their water since the Earth’s early days. 
"Hydrogen and deuterium are still escaping into space, but very slowly, 
says  Pope. 
“Today the atmosphere is rich in oxygen, which reacts with both hydrogen 
and  deuterium to recreate water, which falls back to the Earth's surface. So 
the  vast bulk of the water on Earth is held in a closed system that 
prevents the  planet from gradually drying out." 
Young Sun Paradox
The analyses also showed how much methane existed in the atmosphere of the  
infant Earth. The methanogenesis process creates hydrogen from methane, and 
 since the researchers know how much hydrogen was lost to space, they were 
also  able to estimate how much methane the atmosphere must have contained 
in the  past. 
Their calculations show that at the time when the rocks in the Isua Belt in 
 Greenland were formed, the atmosphere contained 50 to 500 times more 
methane  than it does today. 
This result is relevant to the debate on why the Earth's climate in  
prehistory was almost as warm as it is today, despite the fact that the Sun was 
 
significantly fainter – an apparent contradiction known to researchers as the 
 Young Sun Paradox. 
One solution to the paradox is that the atmosphere at that stage in the  
Earth's history contained large amounts of greenhouse gases.
 
But this hypothesis is invalidated by the study from Pope and her  
colleagues. 
"We have found that the atmosphere contained more methane than it does  
today,” she says. “But it was still a fraction of the amount necessary to 
create  a warm climate solely using atmospheric methane as a greenhouse gas." 
Dramatic climate change
The reason for the climate being so warm must have been something other 
than  atmospheric greenhouse gases. Pope favours a theory proposed by Minik 
Rosing and  others in 2010. 
Their explanation of why the climate was warm despite a fainter sun is that 
 the surface of the Earth was covered with water at that time, whereas 
today the  Earth's surface is partly land mass. 
Seawater absorbs more sunlight than land does, so a larger amount of energy 
 was absorbed when oceans covered the planet. It is argued that this larger 
 energy absorption was sufficient to keep the climate relatively warm. 
Minik Rosing, who also participated in the new study, emphasises that the 
new  results not only reveal something about the past climate, but also put 
current  climate change in perspective. 
"The Earth's climate has so far been a stable system. Current climate 
change,  for which the human race bears much of the responsibility, is dramatic 
compared  to the small variations that have taken place over time,” says 
Rosing. 
“When we increase the amounts of greenhouse gases in this way, an imbalance 
 results which perhaps can never be re-stabilised – a balance that has been 
the  reason why life was able to come into being and  flourish."

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to