Note : 
About capitalization of words, there are  different conventions in use.
My preference is to capitalize all political / economic causes ,  viz,
Socialism, Capitalism, Communism, Fascism, Green-ism, Liberalism,
Conservatism, Anarchism, Constitutionalism, Communalism, etc,
including Libertarianism  --whether or not a "libertarian" is
a member of the Libertarian Party. 
 
In the following the writer uses a different convention--
 
BR
 
===========================================
 
rackjite.com/web/libertarian
 
 
 
 
The Libertarian  Party  

To understand what a Libertarian is,  fill the mold with the intellectual 
racism of Charles Murray, the political  extremism of Ron Paul, and the 
nature of Timothy McVeigh.  
Many are confused over the word libertarian. It is really  quite simple. 
The word without capitalization can be associated with the  Eighteenth Century 
libertine philosophy or with the present civil  libertarian associated with 
the ACLU, but once you capitalize it, it refers  to the Libertarian Party 
and becomes an entirely different animal.  
Watching their conventions on C-SPAN over the years, the visual  experience 
caused me to wonder if perhaps they had a unspoken rule that every  
delegate must look like they own a Harley and bring at least one computer nerd  
along. It’s a pretty simple matter, basically it’s about caring for nothing at 
 all, whatsoever, about anything but your money, your guns and your 
absolute  inborn right to your money and your guns. They have not one lick of 
concern  about society or anyone in it, proved conclusively by their incessant 
screaming  not about fewer taxes but no taxes, not about decriminalization of 
some drugs  but legalization of all drugs, and not about less gun control, 
but no gun  controls.  
No personal income tax whatsoever is at the top of their party  platform. 
My speech on this issue is real short: If you don’t want to pay taxes  pack 
your bags pal. Take a fantasy ride to the only place without taxes,  
Thunderdome. 
Second on their platform is the full legalization of all drugs  including 
heroin, cocaine, crack and crank. The numbers of people who would fall  into 
this snow heap would overwhelm every city in this country to an extent  
never before experienced. Within months there would be literally millions of  
kids and screwed up nitwits perceiving existence only as where and when their  
next line, puff or injection was coming from. Tens of millions more would 
be  buying and trying cocaine within weeks; the hopeless lower class, the 
bored  middle class, college students, the sometime partiers and horny dudes 
using it  to get laid, adding a 10% addiction/dependency rate to the millions 
of afore  mentioned kids and nitwits. This would be the beginning of what 
the Libertarians  are after, the destruction of society and overthrow of the 
United States  Government by handgun and assault rifle.  
Third on the Libertarian platform is an intense overwhelming  gungoonery 
that makes the NRA look tame. They are Timothy McVeigh. 
The leader of the Libertarian Party in the late 80’s and who was  
instrumental in making it America’s Third Party (also their Presidential  
candidate 
at the time) was Ron Paul, a Right-wing Republican congressman from  
Freeport, Texas and an unyielding Pro-Lifer. In the Spring of 88’ when Pat  
Robertson lost the Michigan primary and was knocked out of the presidential 
run,  an 
estimated 200,000 Fundamentalist Robertson followers joined the Libertarian 
 Party ranks.  
The biggest floor fights in their conventions have been over  abortion, for 
twenty years it was left blank to keep the party from splitting,  but now 
by a single digit margin they voted to include a pro-Choice statement.  
Watching this particular fight I finally came to understand. Liberty is not 
what  
drives the Libertarian mentality, but rather the base selfishness of Social 
 Darwinism. After all, besides the death penalty and physical 
incarceration,  there could be no greater government intrusion than forcing 
women to have 
 children they do not want.  
Also keep in mind that their defense of such heroic Americans as  David 
Koresh (an insane cop-killing rapist, child molester and arms dealer who  said 
he was God), and Randy Weaver (a cop-killing arms dealer aligned with the  
Aryan Nations). The attraction to Weaver is not only the guns, but be sure to 
 understand that the Libertarian Party is no friend of the Civil Rights 
movement.  
Take your standard Right-wing lunatic, remove the issues of sex  and 
religion, add a double dose of selfish callous disregard, stir in a gun  waving 
madness putting even the NRA to shame, mix in a seething hatred of the  
Federal government, toss in a few ship containers of legalized crack and crank  
and you got Looneytarians.  
Ideology: The Libertarian mindset stems  from an obsessive adolescent 
hatred of authority in any manner, the inability to  speak or write a sentence 
without a reference to the 2nd Amendment, and of  course the gun toting social 
and economic anarchy they wish upon the land.  
Issues: Top four: The elimination of the  IRS and income taxes, dilution of 
the federal government in lieu of States’  Rights, the full legalization of 
all drugs, and no gun controls.  
Support: The NRA, the Posse Comitatis,  most every armed militia in 
America, The American Spectator,  the CATO Institute,  Ron Paul (R-TX), Helen 
Chenowith (R-Idaho)  and every conservative who has gone off the edge so far 
they 
have come to  believe the Republican Party is just a bunch of Marxist 
liberals.  
Abortion: Over 40% of Libertarians are  Pro life. Keep in mind what the 
powerless Federal government they advocate will  allow the States to do with 
this issue.  
Civil Rights: The civil, equal and human  rights women and minorities have 
gained have been from the Federal Government,  without it, many or most 
would have no vote and would still be bought for  dowries or be cotton picking 
slaves in Alabama. Again, keep in mind what a  powerless Federal government 
will allow the States to do with this issue. 
Gay Rights: Where do gays and lesbians  go to gain legal redress for the 
discrimination directed at them? The  government. Libertarians may sound 
tolerant on specific issues in this matter,  but again, think what gun toting 
anarchy will gain the homosexual community. 
Environment: No federal regulations.  This alone will decimate America to 
literally look like a Mad Max movie.  
Beware: Look what decentralization of  federal power has accomplished in 
Somalia, Lebanon, Rwanda, and the Balkans.  Anarchy, religious/ethnic civil 
war and genocide. 
Long ago as an acne-faced kid without a clue, I read Atlas  Shrugged (Ayn 
Rand) one summer and became a true believer. The government  was all bad, all 
that mattered was the individual’s right to market what they  pleased at 
any price they wished and to make as much money as possible without  any 
government interference. Nothing else mattered in a capitalistic system, the  
political parties were all the same, the existing ideologies were no different  
from one another, Left and Right, up and down, and white and black were all 
 equal. I even sent for a WHO IS JOHN GALT? bumper sticker. But soon my  
acne cleared and I grew up. Sadly, Libertarians have not as yet made that  
transition. 
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
Ayn Rand Alive in  Hell 

Be sure to understand than when you hear  the word “statist” or “statism” 
you are communicating with a Looneytarian; the  most selfish sentient 
species this side of in the Milky Way 
While reading Ted Kaczynski’s Manifesto the other day I noticed  both the 
content and the style kept ringing a bell in the back of my mind,  finally it 
hit me, it sounded just like Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged.  
I have been hearing for years that the Unabomber was a liberal,  leftist 
environmentalist whacko. He is nothing of the sort. This guy is a  Right-wing 
Libertarian, an Ayn Rand  anarchist with a  militia survivalist bent and a 
conspiratorial Luddite lunatic  with the core conservative philosophy of 
moving back in time to the good old  daze. 

“Leftists tend to hate anything  that has an image of being strong, good 
and successful. They hate America, they  hate Western civilization, they hate 
white males, they hate rationality... They  want society to solve everyone’s 
needs for them, take care of them.”  

“Modern leftist philosophers  tend to dismiss reason, science, objective 
reality and to insist that everything  is culturally relative.”  

“Helping black people is not  their real goal. Instead, race problems serve 
as an excuse for them to express  there own hostility and frustrated need 
for power.”  
We can get that far in the Unabomber’s Manifesto and assume it’s  Newt 
Gingrich, Tom DeLay or Dick Armey disseminating their daily pile of crap  from 
the Well of the House. Only when we get to this last quote, which has a  
phrase which promotes nature (which Tom, Dick and Moe would never ever do) are  
we put in a quandary.  

“To avoid this, a movement that exalts  nature and opposes technology must 
take a resolutely anti-leftist stance and  must avoid all collaboration with 
leftists.”  
All these quotes from a man Rush Limbaugh for years, to 20 million  
listeners a day, does his non stop screaming that the Unabomber is a Leftist,  
Liberal environmentalist whacko. It’s not only amazing what the Pig of  
Propaganda gets away with, but the free ride he gets while doing it.  
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
The GOP  Dilemma 

“The most common perspective of the  brand of politics dominating the Net 
is one of radical libertarianism,” Wired  magazine. 
The Republican Party is now fractured into three pieces: The old  guard, 
that somewhat moderate group who historically shills for the wealthy  (think 
of Bob Dole), the Religious Right who want God rather than Reason to sort  it 
all out (think of Pat Robertson), and the Libertarians who want social and  
economic anarchy (think a mix of Steve Forbes and Timothy McVeigh).  
I’m not sure what it is exactly, perhaps living in Texas I have  become so 
accustomed to the Religious Right it falls right off me. Or maybe it’s  that 
their forays into reason and logic are so absurd that I find them more  
entertaining than dangerous. But whatever it happens to be, they are so  
transparent I believe even this nitwit nation will wise up to that silliness  
sooner or later. The Old Guard GOP which holds our economy hostage has held  
power fairly consistently over the years and can be dealt with reasonably which 
 directs my concern towards the Libertarian Right.  
Libertarianism is the movement of the times and it’s going  lickity-split 
down that Social Darwinist road where only the most intelligent,  educated, 
motivated, wealthy, connected and well armed get ahead, or even  survive for 
that matter. Its intellectual base is so selfish, so self centered  and so 
callous that it makes Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell seem altruistic.  
All three factions of the GOP have one issue in common, and it is  the 
issue. That we who have the highest standard of living in the world  with the 
lowest tax rate (and percentage of taxes to GNP), are horrendously,  
illegally, and immorally over taxed. It’s this base selfishness over taxes that 
 
overrides all else in America (other than the occasional spikes in mindless  
patriotism) that has sped us down this conservative road we have been traveling 
 now for a generation. The bridge to the 21st Century has come to stink 
more of  fascism than democracy.  
The alignment between the pro drug secular Libertarians and the  theocratic 
Religious Right seems strange, why would these seemingly divergent  
philosophies pull the exact same levers in the voting booths each year? It is a 
 
matter of any means to their central ends: The destruction of liberalism, the  
termination of liberal democracy, the eradication of pluralism and mixed  
economies and the end of the welfare state which are the only protections a  
people have against that pure capitalism conservatives of all stripes are so 
 hell-bent at arriving at. The very soul of the conservative ideology is 
the  visceral anger they suffer at having to contribute to the society they 
live in.  
Wired Magazine said 30% of the people on the net are Libertarians.  Polls 
show that the number of people claiming to be Libertarians has risen from  2% 
to 15% just in the past five years (though less than 1% choose to waste 
their  vote on Libertarian Party candidates). I estimate that every one of 
those 99%  who do not vote for the Libertarian Party vote for the most extreme  
conservatives they can find.  
Remember too, the Libertarian think tank, the CATO  Institute is the prime 
mover in conservative recruitment on college  campuses. It is there that 
they propagandize and grossly overstate the students  probability of not 
collecting Social Security, instill a rabid hatred of  liberals who have stolen 
their old age pensions, and organize searches for  instances of political 
correctness they can exaggerate and pander to  the mainstream press. 
Libertarians hate liberals far more than do either  conservatives or the 
Religious 
Right; after all, it is what the guns are for.  
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
Prediction 

The attraction of being a Libertarian is  not only getting to boast a 
callous selfishness beyond even that of  conservatives, but they get to hate 
twice as many people as either Democrats or  Republicans get to hate. 
Remember Charles Murray? The cool guy who wrote The Bell  Curve, that book 
saying that as blacks are inherently stupid, let’s save  ourselves some 
grief by not bothering with them anymore. By the way, his  previous book Losing 
Ground said the same thing. Well I’ve been seeing  Chuck floating around on 
the TV Pundit trail pushing his new book, What it  Means to be a 
Libertarian. This has led me to believe that Charles Murray  is after the 
Libertarian 
Party’s nomination for President of the United States.  
I have to thank Murray for helping to make Libertarianism  far more clear 
to me on an intellectual level. The argument he most often finds  himself up 
against is that if indeed, the government did stop all regulatory  action as 
he wishes it to do, what then of all those hurt by such a policy. He  likes 
to speak allegorically, metaphorically and crapologically, but what he is  
saying comes across as clear as an uncurved bell, let the competition of the 
 free market work it all out. If a lot of planes crash on one airline 
people will  go to another. If one meat packing plant ships tons of rancid meat 
after a time  they will go out of business. If a drug company adds Eboli to 
toothpaste the  courts will punish them after the fact. It’s the same with 
the environment. If  Mobil floods the Chesapeake Bay with oil and it starts on 
fire they will get  fined and people will go to Exxon stations. If Montana 
kills all the buffalo,  antelope, and Spotted Owls coming out of Yellowstone 
Park, they will get yelled  at. You get the idea. It’s always an after the 
fact process. Thousands, perhaps  millions of people suffer or die and it’s 
all too bad and Chuck may feel sad  about it but the market will straighten 
it all out in the end.  
Not only is Libertarianism one of the most obvious forms of Social  
Darwinism since the fall of the Third Reich, but it’s that classic example of  
the 
ends justifying the means. Also I have witnessed not only Murray, but also  
many others moving the same direction. Many conservatives become so consumed 
by  AM Hate radio they keep moving further and further to the Right until 
such  hatred builds so high they finally go off their Right-wing rockers and 
arrive at  the last stop there at the end of the political spectrum, the 
Libertarian Party.  ... 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to