For most of the past 7 years I have said little by way of outrage at  
political budgets,
either Democratic or Republican. Now we have Obamacare kicking in and, to  
add
insult to injury, the Ryan budget. I've already expressed serious  
objections to
Obamacare; no need to repeat those points yet again. I'm already getting  
shafted
by some of the new provisions, just kicking in this year  --looking  
forward to
medical procedures that I will no longer be able to reasonably afford  
because
of the sonovabitch in the WH and his colleagues in the Congress. 
 
Now, at least if the Ryan budget was to pass, an actual possibility if the  
GOP
takes the Senate in  November, what is today a serious problem  could become
literally life threatening. Hell, if I criticize the Democrats you can be  
100% sure
that I won't be in the least reluctant to criticize Republicans for  making 
matters even worse.
 
RC is not the Republican Party Lite. 
 
At least speaking for myself, both parties are full of crap and
while I may despise one more than the other any given year,
each makes me sick  --and metaphor now could become
medical reality.
 
Damn right I am angry and upset.
 
Billy
 
 
=====================================
 
 
 
3/22/2012 9:59:31 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]  
writes:

What do you expect today's progressives to say??  Applause and encore??? 
Sad to see you enlist them in your quest against  Libertarianism. I'm 
disappointed in extremis.... 

This is making for  uncomfortable bedfellows. 

VERY UNCOMFORTABLE.  

David

  _   
 
"Free  speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by 
definition,  needs no protection."—Neal  Boortz 



On 3/21/2012 12:03 PM,  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  

from the site :
Think Progress
 
_Paul Ryan’s Budget Includes $3  Trillion Giveaway To Corporations, The 
Rich_ 
(http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/20/448057/paul-ryan-claims-to-maintain-revenue-in-budget-that-gives-away-3-trillion-to-corporations-and-the-
wealthy/) 
By _Travis Waldron_ (http://thinkprogress.org/author/twaldron/)  on Mar 20, 
2012
 
The _budget_ (http://budget.house.gov/prosperity/fy2013.htm)  unveiled by 
House Budget Committee  Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) this morning includes 
_substantial changes_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/republican-budget-proposal-to-be-unveiled/2012/03/19/gIQALstqNS_blog.html)
  to the 
American tax code,  both for corporations and individuals. Ryan’s tax plan 
shrinks the number of  income tax brackets from six to two, with marginal tax 
rates set at 10  percent and 25 percent. He repeals the Alternative Minimum 
Tax (AMT), slices  the top corporate tax rate to 25 percent, and repeals 
all of the health care  taxes contained in the Affordable Care Act. It also 
repeals the repatriation  tax on profits corporations earn overseas then bring 
back to the United  States.  
In all, those tax breaks amount to a _$3 trillion_ 
(http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?Docid=2969&DocTypeID=5) 
 giveaway to the 
richest Americans and  corporations, according to the Tax Policy Center. 
Repealing the repatriation  tax would add roughly $130 billion to that.  
This morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Ryan insisted that the plan would  
generate the same amount of revenue as the government currently receives. In  
true Ryan form, though, he wouldn’t say how: 
RYAN: We’re taking the tax system and reforming it along the way this  new 
bipartisan compromise and consensus is showing. Get rid of the  special 
interest loopholes, special deductions, lower everybody’s tax  rates, bring in 
at least as much revenue to the government but grow the  economy and create 
jobs, and get spending under control so we can  pay off this debt. 
SCARBOROUGH: So you say that you want to bring as much revenue into the  
government even with lower tax rates. There are obviously only a few ways  to 
do that as far as eliminating tax loopholes, whether you’re talking  about 
the home mortgage loophole, the health care loophole, or the  charitable 
interest deductions. Which one of those do you eliminate? 
RYAN: We want to do this in the light of day and in front of  everybody. So 
the Ways and Means Committee, which is in charge of  the tax system, sent 
us the plan here, which is a 10 and 25 percent  bracket for individuals and 
small businesses, and then they want to have  hearings and, in light of day, 
show how they would go about doing  this.

 
The taxes Ryan wants to repeal all primarily impact the richest Americans  
and corporations. Repealing the repatriation tax, as Republicans have  
attempted multiple times since taking control of the House in 2011, amounts  to 
a 
_huge giveaway_ 
(http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/08/08/289504/video-the-corporate-dollars-behind-congresss-push-for-a-huge-corporate-tax-holiday/)
  to corporations. And ending the AMT  and investment taxes from the ACA 
while dropping the top income tax rate  would give massive tax breaks to the 
rich. That isn’t surprising — it’s _virtually identical_ 
(http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/08/3-trillion-here-3-trillion-there/) 
 to what Ryan 
attempted in  last year’s budget, which he called the “Path to Prosperity.” 
Ryan’s plan for income taxes, meanwhile, is similar to GOP presidential  
candidate Rick Santorum’s, and the Tax Policy Center found that his plan  
would reduce total federal revenues by _$900 billion a year_ 
(http://taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/Santorum-plan.cfm) . Though Ryan offered 
no  specifics, it
’s clear that to avoid blowing a hole in the federal budget,  the GOP will 
have to make up lost revenue by raising taxes on the poor and  middle class 
(or by ending tax breaks that primarily benefit them) or by  taking the axe 
to _vital_ 
(http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/04/15/158910/ryan-budget-no-food/)  
_safety net_ 
(http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/04/15/158910/ryan-budget-no-food/)  
_programs_ 
(http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/04/05/172014/paul-ryan-budget-medicare-medicaid-myths/)
  that the poorest 
Americans — including  _women, infants, and children_ 
(http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/02/09/173778/gop-war-on-babies/)  — 
depend on the  most. Again, 
that shouldn’t be surprising — this edition of Ryan’s plan is  simply a 
worse version of last year’s “_Path to the  Poorhouse_ 
(http://www.americanprogress.org/pr/2011/04/pr20110406) .”




-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to