That is for experts in medical practice to decide. But I certainly  would
assume a low figure in the 10% range, maybe less. Above that
and you create major disincentives and  that would
be a really terrible idea.
 
Billy
 
------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 
3/26/2012 2:43:37 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]  
writes:

Hi  Billy,  


On Mar 26, 2012, at 2:37 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  
wrote:




Finally, the CPC budget would prevent the 27-percent cut to  physicians’ 
payments under Medicare that is scheduled to be imposed in  calendar year 
2013. This automatic cut resulting from the sustainable  growth rate (SGR) 
mechanism installed in the 1990s has been avoided in  recent years by providing 
offsetting deficit reduction – referred to as  the “doc fix.” CPC includes 
and fully pays for this “doc fix” over 10  years, preventing the physician 
payment cut.

 
This is nonsense, all doctors  should be required, as part of their 
licensing, to provide medical services to X number of   patients under 
Medicare. 
This would be a "sacrifice"? Like hell. I simply cannot feel pain for  people 
earning $ 150,000 or $ 250,000 when they are asked to chip in for the  
national good and the well being of people who live at the poverty  level.




Fine, but for what level of "X"?  10%?  50%?  90%?


The problem is that Medicare patients are not evenly distributed  
geographically.  Do we bus patients around to de-segregate them?


I agree, our current pseudo-market system of health care is a general  
disaster all the way around.  But underpriced Medicare patients don't  just 
cost 
doctors, they also cost nurses, clinics, non-profits, etc.  Who  pays them?



If you wanted to just propose a, say, 10% surtax on medical professionals  
making more than $150,000 and use that to fund Medicare coverage, that would 
 probably be more equitable.  Otherwise, the decline in payments is an  
effective tax on those doctors who *are* willing to take Medicare, and  
enforcing quotas is a bitch.


E
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to