Study: 'God Gap' Present Among Latinos Also

 
By _Napp Nazworth_ (http://www.christianpost.com/author/napp-nazworth/)   , 
Christian Post Reporter
April 5, 2012

 
 
Latinos are also influenced by the "culture war" or  "God gap" thesis, 
according to a new study. Evangelical Latinos are more likely to support  
Republicans and secular Latinos are more likely to support Democrats. Catholic  
Latinos are the least influenced by the _culture_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/culture/)  war thesis.
The study, "Do Latino Christians and Seculars Fit the Culture War Profile?  
Latino Religiosity and Political Behavior," was published by Troy Gibson,  
professor of political science at the University of Southern Mississippi, 
and  Christopher Hare, a graduate student in political _science_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/science/)  at the  University of Georgia, 
in the 
April, 2012, issue of _Politics_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/politics/)  and  Religion. 
In recent decades, religiosity has become an important predictor of 
election  outcomes. Those with high levels of religiosity are more likely to 
vote  
Republican while those with lower levels of religiosity and those 
unaffiliated  with any religion are more likely to vote Democrat. 
At the same time, race and ethnicity have also been reliable predictors of  
vote choice. Whites more often vote Republican while blacks and Latinos 
prefer  Democrats. For some, race or ethnicity trumps religion. Blacks with 
high levels  of religiosity, for instance, are not more likely to vote 
Republican than blacks  with low levels of religiosity, even though they are 
more 
conservative on social  issues, such as _abortion_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/abortion/)  and _homosexuality_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/homosexuality/) . 
Gibson and Hare wanted to find, therefore, whether or not the God gap is  
influential among Latinos and whether there is variation among the three main 
 Latino religious groups – _evangelicals_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/evangelicals/) ,  Catholics and seculars – 
after controlling for other 
factors, such as _gender_ (http://www.christianpost.com/topics/gender/) ,  
socioeconomic status and marital status. 
They found that, among Latinos, being evangelical or secular has a  
statistically significant impact on ideology and partisanship in the directions 
 
that the "culture war" thesis predicts. Evangelical Latinos are more likely to 
 be conservative and Republican and secular Latinos are more likely to be 
liberal  and Democratic. Among Catholic Latinos, though, there is not a 
statistically  significant relationship.  
"Evangelical Latinos are 24% more likely than secular Latinos, and 6% more  
likely than committed Catholic Latinos, to identify themselves as 
ideological  conservatives, and are 12% more likely than committed Catholic 
Latinos 
and 18%  more likely than secular Latinos to be Republican," Gibson and Hare 
wrote. 
The finding that Catholicism is insignificant should not be surprising 
given  that Catholics are typically cross-pressured voters. They tend to 
support 
 Republicans on abortion and gay _marriage_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/marriage/)  and Democrats  on the death 
penalty, _health care_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/health-care/)  and  social welfare 
programs. 
Latinos are considered an important voting bloc for the parties because 
they  are the fastest growing of any race or ethnic group in the country and 
they are  concentrated in states that have a large number of electoral college 
votes, such  _California_ (http://www.christianpost.com/region/california/) 
, Florida,  New York and Texas. 
The Latino vote has become an important topic in the current election.  
Republicans have done poorly among Latinos in recent surveys. A Fox News  
February poll of likely Latino voters showed about 70 percent supporting  
President Obama while only 14 percent said they would support Mitt Romney, the  
likely Republican nominee. Many pundits have said that Romney must 
substantially  improve his support among Latinos to win the nomination. 
Gibson and Hare's study suggests that both political parties can fruitfully 
 target their Latino mobilization efforts by taking religion into account. 
"Perhaps the most important implication of our findings," Gibson and Hare  
wrote, "is that, while political commentators often paint Latinos with a 
broad  brush, i.e., 'the Latino vote,' Latino political behavior may not be 
nearly as  cohesive as conventional wisdom holds."

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to