Chris :
Many thanks for your comments. But I am  less skeptical about the author's
conclusions since I have read similar stuff elsewhere about how  derivatives
help hyper-leverage the whole ( global ) financial system,
 
Hence, as the article says about the value of financials, viz., most  
derivatives :
 
-23 TIMES WORLD  GDP.
This has been the "prophet in the wilderness" cry of Kevin Phillips  for
about 20 years now, viz, finance capital is out of control, answers  only
to greed and the bottom line, and has little or no sense of morality
or the national interest.
 
This said, some healthy skepticism about the article   --or  others--
is a really good idea.  It seems safe enough to say that as  economists
we are all amateurs. Skepticism helps keep us honest.
 
Also, you pointed out some questionable assertions that otherwise
I would not have realized, or not found out about for X amount of  time.
That is very helpful.
 
Thanks again
Billy
 
=======================================
 
 
 
 
 
4/12/2012 10:35:29 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:

 
This author is a  bit dramatic.  Derivatives are a primary cause of the 
severity of the  financial crisis, but hardly the only cause as the author 
suggests.  What  about the grossly leveraged normal guy on Main Street who got 
that way with  careless loans? 
Also when he says  that there is no clearing house for derivatives he is 
ignoring exchanges like  the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (that bought the 
Chicago Board of Trade), the  Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), etc.  
These 
organizations have  lots of private clearing firms that work within the 
rules of the  exchanges. 
Can the many  exchanges and clearing firms keep track of and adequately 
regulate all of the  derivatives?  Heck no.  As soon as a dangerous loophole 
gets closed,  some very bright trader will figure out a way to invent another 
angle at  working the system.  These traders will always be a step ahead of 
the  regulators. 
The derivatives  market is a house of cards and it is dangerous, but this 
article over  reaches. 
Chris 
 

 
 
From:  [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]]  On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012  11:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc:  [email protected]
Subject: [RC] Everything you wanted to know about  derivatives but were 
afraid to ask

 

 

 

 
from the site :   Seeking Alpha
 

 

 
Why Derivatives Caused Financial Crisis  
 
 
April 12, 2010  


 

 
As we celebrate year three of the Great  Financial Crisis with the first 
official bailout of an entire country  (Greece), I’m still astounded by the 
complete and utter lack of coverage the  underlying cause of this Crisis has 
received.
 
Tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands  of articles and research 
reports have been written about the Crisis, and yet I  would wager less than 
1% of them actually bother talking about what caused it,  let alone how the 
various efforts to stop it have in fact FAILED to address  this key issue. 
Remember back in 2007? At that time we were told  it was all about Subprime 
mortgages. Then in 2008, we were told it was the  investment banks, 
specifically Lehman Brothers’ (_LEHMQ.PK_ 
(http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lehmq.pk) 
) failure and _AIG_ (http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aig) ’s credit default 
swaps. In  2009, we were told it was poor accounting standards and bad bets 
made by Wall  Street. And here we are in 2010, and we’re still being told it 
was simply bad  bets made by Wall Street. 
All of these answers are partially right, but  none of them are totally 
100% accurate. Why? Because they fail to address the  one underlying issue that 
links ALL of these items. I’m talking about the  Black Hole of Finance: a 
bottomless pit that no official or regulator bothers  mentioning in public 
because acknowledging it would mean acknowledging that  all of the efforts to 
stop the Crisis are truly paltry. 
What caused the Crisis? 
Derivatives.
 
You’ve probably heard this term before, or have  some vague understanding 
of what the term means. But the actual reality of  derivatives and what they 
represent for the financial markets remains a topic  no one in the 
mainstream media (or the regulators for that matter) wants to  touch. 
Why? 
Let’s do some quick math. 
If you add up the value of every stock on the  planet, the entire market 
capitalization would be about $36 trillion. If you  do the same process for 
bonds, you’d get a market capitalization of roughly  $72 trillion. 
The notional value of the derivative market is  roughly $1.4 QUADRILLION. 
I realize that number sounds like something out  of Looney tunes, so I’ll 
try to put it into perspective. 
$1.4 Quadrillion is  roughly: 
-40 TIMES THE WORLD’S STOCK  MARKET. 
-10 TIMES the value of EVERY STOCK & EVERY  BOND ON THE PLANET. 
-23 TIMES WORLD GDP.
 
What’s a derivative? 
As their name implies, derivatives are  securities whose value is “derived”
 from an underlying asset (a mortgage,  credit card debt, etc). A lot of 
smart people have tried to explain what these  things are, but they usually 
miss the forest for the trees. A derivative is  NOT an asset. It’s, in 
reality, nothing, just an imaginary security of no  tangible value that banks/ 
financial institutions trade as a kind of  “gentleman’s bet” on the value of 
future risk or  securities. 
Let me give you an example. Let’s say you and I  want to bet on whether our 
neighbor Joe will default on his mortgage. Is the  bet an asset? Does it 
have any real value? Both counts register a definite  “no.”
 
That’s the rough equivalent of a derivative.  There are dozens of different 
types of these things based on just about  everything under the sun. Some 
derivatives are actually derived off the value  of other derivatives, a fact 
that makes my head hurt every time I think about  it. 
The other thing you need to know about  derivatives is that they are 
totally unregulated. There is no derivative  clearing house. No official report 
explains the risk or actual value of these  things (the notional value of the 
derivatives market is not the same thing as  the actual "at risk" money 
underlying these securities: I'll detail all of  this in tomorrow's essay). 
Regardless, to claim that these things have any  real tangible value or 
perform any kind of wealth generation (for anyone other  than Wall Street) is 
pure fiction (perpetuated by another fiction: that Wall  Street is able to 
value these things or price them accurately). But thanks to  Wall Street’s 
lobbying power, they’ve become the centerpiece of the financial  markets.
 
If these numbers scare you, you’re not alone. As  early as 1998, soon to be 
chairperson of the Commodity Futures Trading  Commission (CFTC), Brooksley 
Born, approached Alan Greenspan, Bob Rubin, and  Larry Summers (the three 
heads of economic policy) about derivatives. She said  she thought derivatives 
should be reined in and regulated because they were  getting too out of 
control. The response from Greenspan and company was that  if she pushed for 
regulation, the market would implode. 
Remember, this was back in 1998: a full DECADE  before the Crisis hit. And 
already, the guys in charge of the markets knew  that derivatives were such 
a big problem that trying to regulate them or  increase their transparency 
would destroy the market. If you think I’m  exaggerating, you can read the 
actual Washington Post story _here._ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/25/AR2009052502108.html)
  
So why are these items so accepted? Well, for  one thing Wall Street makes 
roughly $35 billion+ per year from trading them,  so it has a powerful 
incentive to keep them untouched. 
Also, it’s kind of difficult for Ben Bernanke  and the world’s central 
bankers
 
to claim they saved the  financial world from destruction when you realize 
that even the most liberal  estimate of the bailout costs ($24 trillion) is 
equal to less than 2% of the  notional value of the derivatives market.  
Indeed, even saying the number ($1+ QUADRILLION)  sounds ridiculous. Every 
time I’ve mentioned it at a dinner party I get  nothing but blank stares or 
snickers. Can you imagine if someone in a position  of power actually 
bothered explaining this on TV? The entire financial media  would respond with, 
“
well, that’s great, now we…. wait a minute… what did you  just say?” 
And yet, you simply cannot discuss the Financial  Crisis without mentioning 
derivatives. What do you think subprime mortgage  backed securities were? 
Derivatives. What about Credit Default Swaps? Yep,  derivatives again. Heck, 
even the Greece crisis involved that country using  derivatives to hide its 
true liabilities in order to join the European  Union. 
In plain terms, derivatives are THE cause of the  Financial Crisis. They 
are behind EVERY failure/ default that has occurred  thus far. The fact that 
virtually no one is willing to address this issue or  include it in the 
discussion of how to insure we don’t have a Second Round of  the Crisis only 
confirms the fact that no one has a clue how to resolve this  situation.
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 
<[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to