Hi Billy,

On Apr 13, 2012, at 11:30 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Ernie :
> " What kind of ideas? Which people? "
>  
> Fair question, indeed, a necessary question.
>  
> Let me refer to Killian's "Swing Voters" since the idea of reaching out to
> Independents has been a priority of mine for several years now.
> NOT as iron clad but as an initial suggestion.

Sounds reasoanble.

>  
> OTOH, why not try for political influence per se ? Killian discussed
> ( in her C-Span interview ) a number of politicians who she regards
> as willing --even eager--   to come up with bi-partisan solutions.
> Trouble is that these folks, like Warner and Susan Collins,
> have gotten really bad treatment from party hacks in their
> respective parties since they resist party-line strategies
> and ways of doing things.

I think the Washington Establishment -- what little is left in the center -- 
would be a stretch.

Maybe state legislators would be accessible, but I think actual professional 
politicians are not a good target audience of early adopters.  Save them for 
phase two or three. :-)

> Could we at least suggest ways that a bi-partisan consensus just might
> be able to emerge on Capitol Hill  ?  Not for all issues, that ain't gonna 
> happen,
> but for selected issues, like energy policy.  Or industrial policy.

You mean, sorta like the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, on a 
different topic?
>  
> Killian made the point about Indies, though, that they became Independent
> precisely because Reps and Dems do not work together to get things  done
> for common good. So they have basically said "screw you" to the parties
> they once were affiliated with.
>  
> Anyway, for openers, something to think about and refine.

I like the phrase "Indie" -- it is in vogue in the culture these days, and much 
hipper than "Centrist", "Moderate", or "Bipartisan."

>  ------------
>  
>  
> " should we start blogging this on rc.org, or create a separate domain? "
>  
> Maybe you could explain how RC.org could become a blog .

The website itself *is* a blog:

http://radicalcentrism.org/

The front page is a series of posts.  You can see an index on the right.


The Centroids mailing list is hosted somewhere else entirely.

> That idea makes really good sense, but what are the practical
> nuts and bolts ?  What would need to change in terms of
> day-to-day communications ? 

To add a post to the blog, I can give you a login on the website, or I can 
setup a special email address for you to submit posts.

> That is, we have a pretty good thing going and it would be unwise
> to make it difficult to continue on as we have.

RC.org == blog
http://radicalcentrism.org/

Centroids == mailing list
http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism

Two completely different websites, albeit ones that cross-reference each other.

> I'm also open to the idea of a new domain. Same questions.

Much simpler to start with RC.org until we nail down a 'voice', at which point 
we can see if there's a better domain to use for marketing.

>  In practical terms, what do we need to know ?

How to write compelling blog entries.  

http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/08/12/how-to-craft-a-blog-post-10-crucial-points-to-pause/

They differ from email in that they should:

a) be self-contained

b) have a great title

c) follow a relatively consistent topic

The actual mechanics are pretty simple.  You just tell me whether you want to 
use a website or send an email.

-- Ernie P.


>  
> Billy
>  
>  
> =====================
>  
>  
>  
> 4/13/2012 11:13:48 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] 
> writes:
> Hi Billy,
> 
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 10:43 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> So that we become known for :
>> providing genuinely useful political ideas to people.
>>  
>> What do you think ?
> 
> Not a bad start.  But we probably need a tighter focus for the initial 
> launch. What kind of ideas? Which people?
> 
> Also, should we start blogging this on rc.org, or create a separate domain?
> 
> -- Ernie P.
> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
>  
> 
> -- 
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to