Yeah, and he also tries to be objective and non-ideological.
If we ever start to gain a visible reputation maybe he  could 
be persuaded to sign up with RC.org.
 
I've tried to interest some other "names" in the world of ideas,
but the impression I get is that people like them won't "join"  anything
unless is has recognition for quality, and such things as "staying  power."
We now have the staying power part, imagine it, we have been around
for 8 years now, but so far no intellectual or other celebrities (  except 
Ernie ).
 
Also, we still have not attracted any women.  Not that long ago
I had hopes that we might interest Avril Lavigne ( wink ), but no such  
luck.
Just one hot babe and we would be off to the races.
 
We need a breakthrough, Chris, something to put us on the map.
 
Billy
 
 
====================================
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4/15/2012 3:27:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:

 
I like this guy  Billy.  He seems to get the big picture, lists the issues, 
but he has the  humility to pull back from a dramatic prediction. 
Chris   
 

 
 
From:  [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]]  On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 9:37  AM
To: [email protected]
Cc:  [email protected]
Subject: [RC] Walter Russell Mead analysis of world  economy --turmoil ahead

 

 

 
Via  Meadia
 
Walter Russell  Mead
 

 
April 14, 2012   
 
The  World Economy: Back on the Brink?
 
Via  Meadia isn’t an  economic forecasting site; if I knew what the world 
economy was going to be  doing tomorrow I would be too busy making zillions 
by trading exotic financial  instruments the rest of you bozos know nothing 
about to share my secret  insights with the rest of you. (Indeed, one useful 
thing to remember about all  economic talking heads and pundits: these are 
people who think they can make  more money by giving their opinions rather 
than acting on them. If you knew  what markets were going to do, you would 
have no incentive to share that  knowledge.) 
But  for what it’s worth, the world economy is beginning to look a little 
shaky  again. The two problems: Europe has papered over its euro difficulties 
but  hasn’t solved anything, and China is reaching the limits of its old  
development model without having found a way to shift to something  new. 
In  past decades, the relative health of the US economy might have provided 
enough  of a global stimulus to overcome these problems, but the train is 
too long and  the hill is too steep for the old locomotive to pull the world 
economy to the  top of the mountain on its own. In Pharaoh’s dream, the 
seven lean cows  devoured the seven fat ones and that is our fear today: that 
the parts of the  world economy will bring down the successful ones. 
The  danger is greater because the US is in the middle of its 
transformation from a  blue model, industrial economy to something 
postindustrial that we 
don’t yet  understand. The interaction of Asian, European, Latin American 
and Anglosphere  economies also confounds policy makers. We’ve never had 
anything quite like  the global economy in view today, with its mix of huge 
surplus and titanic  deficit economies, with its fiat money and globally 
integrated financial  markets. The experts and pundits stroke their chins very 
convincingly on TV,  but neither they nor anybody else really grasps either the 
big picture or all  the moving parts that make up the world economy today. 
The  immediate problem is that Europe’s latest dose of pain meds is 
beginning to  wear off. Investors are looking at the Portuguese, Spanish and 
Italian  economies and they don’t like what they see. Nor should they. Bond 
yields 
are  rising sharply across Europe as people think more clearly about just 
how  unlikely it is that the current mix of fiscal austerity and financial 
market  life support can generate the kind of growth Europe  needs. 
News  that China’s GDP growth has slowed _more  dramatically than expected_ 
(http://w
ww.forbes.com/sites/robertolsen/2012/04/13/chinas-economic-growth-slowest-in-nearly-3-years/)
  also has investors worried. The political  
turmoil over the Bo Xilai scandal isn’t helping; China’s model requires a  
strong, technocratic economic management team that is able to act decisively.  
China’s leaders look more embattled than usual, and its not clear if the  
government will be able to stick to its economic playbook as it seeks to keep  
the population sweet. 
How  all this plays out in the world’s volatile stock markets is not 
something  Via  Meadia can predict, unfortunately. And the long term outlook in 
 
our view remains bright. 
There  is a vital truth about the economy that doomsayers often forget: 
People want  to make money, are constantly looking for ways to make money, and 
are creative  and adaptive. More people than ever before live in countries 
where they are  allowed to try to improve their situation in life, and where 
governments are  more focused on creating conditions favorable to growth. We 
have more  scientific and technical knowledge than ever before, and the 
information  revolution in particular is creating new industries and new 
opportunities with  breathtaking speed. 
Given  all that, optimism about the medium to long term seems like the 
right  approach. But with the potential for rapid, transformative growth also 
comes  the danger of growth pains. Between the Civil War and 1910 the US 
became the  world’s largest and most advanced economy and huge new cities and 
industries  sprang up across the country. That was also a time of painful 
depressions,  sudden economic crises that ruined investors and bankrupted 
companies, and of  social conflict and economic inequality. 
Good  news for the big picture does not translate automatically into smooth 
and  predictable economic progress in the short term. In fact, the better 
the big  picture looks, and the more powerful are the forces pushing the 
world economy  toward major growth and change, the more market turmoil we are 
likely to  experience — and the harder it is for policy makers to know what to 
 do. 
Growth hurts.  Change brings risk. Welcome to our brave new  world.


-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 
<[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to