Thinking Green — The New Religion

 
 
By _R. Albert Mohler,  Jr._ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/author/r-albert-mohler-jr/)  , Christian Post 
Guest Columnist
January 13, 2010|1:18 pm
The human species is inherently and resolutely  religious. The Bible and 
the Christian tradition affirm this truth, even as we  know that the religious 
impulse can so easily transform itself into  idolatry.
Even the most cursory look at the world's _culture_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/culture/) s will indicate  the religious 
fervor that 
characterizes humanity. The only observers who seem  shocked by this universal 
phenomenon are the secularists and the prophets of  secularization theory who 
were 
absolutely certain that religious faith and  religious fervor would 
disappear in the modern world. 
Needless to say, it hasn't turned out that way. The theory of 
secularization  is a shadow of its former self. Leading proponents like Peter 
Berger of 
Boston  University now acknowledge that the secularization thesis was not an 
accurate  predictor of the fate of religious belief in the modern world. The 
modern world  is not secularized. Indeed, many of the most heated conflicts 
around the world  today involve conflicting faiths. As Berger has 
commented, it turns out that a  few European nations and the American 
intellectual 
elites are the exceptions,  rather than the rule. 
And yet, the intellectual elites are not so secular as they believe  
themselves to be. As it happens, their religion may not be theistic, but it is 
a  
religion all the same. 
That fact is confirmed in a recent article in The Chronicle of Higher 
_Education_ (http://www.christianpost.com/topics/education/) . Stephen T.  
Asma, 
a professor of philosophy at Columbia College Chicago, argues that the new  
religion of many secular folk is ecology. As Asma explains, many secular 
types  suffer from "green guilt." 
In "Green Guilt," he writes:  
Now the secular world still has to make sense out of its own invisible,  
psychological drama-in particular, its feelings of guilt and indignation.  
Environmentalism, as a substitute for religion, has come to the rescue.  
Nietzsche's argument about an ideal God and guilt can be replicated in a new  
form: We need a belief in a pristine _environment_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/environment/)  because  we need to be 
cruel to ourselves as inferior 
beings, and we need that because we  have these aggressive instincts that 
cannot be let out. 
Asma rightly notes that Friedrich Nietzsche, the nihilist who famously  
declared that God is dead, understood that religion was not dead at all. He 
"was  the first to notice that religious emotions, like guilt and indignation, 
are  still with us, even if we're not religious." 
These "religious emotions," including guilt, explain why so many people 
seek  _relief_ (http://www.christianpost.com/topics/relief/)   by therapy or 
treatment of some sort. Therapy replaces _theology_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/theology/) ; the analyst  replaces the 
minister; psychotropic 
drugs become the sacraments; and confessing  one's misdeeds on Oprah 
substitutes for the confession of sin. Some of the most  obviously religious 
individuals on earth are those who genuinely insist that  they are free from 
any 
religious beliefs at all. 
Asma is not the first to note the deeply religious character of radical  
environmentalism, but his analysis of the structure of this religious system 
is  truly insightful. 
He explains: 
Instead of religious sins plaguing our conscience, we now have the  
transgressions of leaving the water running, leaving the lights on, failing to  
recycle, and using plastic grocery bags instead of paper. In addition, the  
righteous pleasures of being more orthodox than your neighbor (in this case  
being more green) can still be had-the new heresies include failure to 
compost,  or refusal to go organic. Vitriol that used to be reserved for Satan 
can 
now be  discharged against evil corporate chief executives and drivers of 
gas-guzzling  vehicles. Apocalyptic fear-mongering previously took the shape 
of repent or burn  in hell, but now it is recycle or burn in the ozone hole. 
In fact, it is  interesting the way environmentalism takes on the 
apocalyptic aspects of the  traditional religious narrative. The idea that the 
end is 
nigh is quite central  to traditional Christianity-it is a jolting wake-up 
call to get on the righteous  path. And we find many environmentalists in a 
similarly earnest panic about _climate change_ 
(http://www.christianpost.com/topics/climate-change/)   and global warming. 
Interestingly, Asma begins his article with an anecdote about his  
six-year-old son, who scolded his father for letting the water run too long. 
The  
boy is clearly "stressed and anxious" about the "sins of environmentalism." 
The  boy had obviously been indoctrinated into the religious system of  
environmentalism -- something common to many of today's children and  
adolescents. 
Stephen Asma's essay is important for multiple reasons. It is an excellent  
analysis of the religious character of environmentalism, complete with a 
set of  comprehensive doctrines and religious practices. It is also an 
excellent  consideration of the religious nature of human beings. Asma 
understands 
the  pretensions of the secular mind, and he also sees the religious impulse 
working  its way to the surface in the modern obsessions with health, 
fitness, and an  ever-expanding set of "secular" sins. 
At the same time, he writes from an apparently secular perspective -- at  
least warning that we do not need yet another "humorless religion." He is 
also  identified as the author of Why I am a Buddhist. He seems above all to 
desire a  bit less religious fervor from the environmentalists. He writes, 
"Let us save  the planet, by all means. But let's also admit to ourselves that 
we have a  natural propensity toward guilt and indignation, and let that 
fact temper our  fervor to more reasonable levels." 
We are left without a clue about what Asma would see as "more reasonable  
levels," but his essay offers a rare glimpse into the religious character of 
the  rather new faith of environmentalism, complete with its "potential for 
dogmatic  zeal and obsession." His essay puts an intelligent spotlight on 
the new religion  of green.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to