Re : Article 
 
What this also means is that any number of population forecasts  
--like projected Hispanic majorities in various cities or districts-- isn't 
 going
to happen, or at most will only happen in a few scattered locations.
 
Lesson about the perils of straight line trend forecasting. Such  
projections
are only good if forces keep the trend moving in a constant  direction.
Trends need to be tracked, and past forecasts may turn out badly
if the forces that once generated a trend break down. 
 
It now looks like Hispanics have exceeded African Americans as
America's largest minority but that this may be the maximum,
especially since half of Hispanics self identify as white, like  Italians.
Politically , concerning Hispanics, 2012 will be similar to 2008,
but this will be less true by 2016 and probably much less true
by 2020 and 2024.
 
Billy
 
==================================
 
 
 
Real Clear Politics
 
April 26, 2012  
Shrinking Problem: Illegal Immigration From  Mexico
By _Michael  Barone_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?author=Michael+Barone&id=14827) 

The illegal immigration problem is going away. 
That's the conclusion I draw from the latest report of the Pew Hispanic  
Center on Mexican immigration to the United States.

 
Pew's demographers have carefully combed through statistics compiled by the 
 U.S. Census Bureau, the Department of Homeland Security and the Mexican  
government, and have come up with estimates of the flow of migrants from and  
back to Mexico. Their work seems to be as close to definitive as possible. 
They conclude that from 2005 to 2010 some 1.39 million people came from  
Mexico to the United States and 1.37 million went from the U.S. to Mexico. 
"The  largest wave of immigration in history from a single country to the 
United  States," they write, "has come to a standstill." 
The turning point seems to have come with the collapse of housing prices 
and  the onset of recession in 2007. Annual immigration from Mexico dropped 
from  peaks of 770,000 in 2000 and 670,000 in 2004 to 140,000 in 2010. 
As a result, the Mexican-born population in the United States decreased 
from  12.6 million in 2007 to 12.0 million in 2010. That decrease consisted 
entirely  of Mexican-born illegal immigrants, whose numbers decreased from 7 
million in  2007 to 6.1 million in 2010. 
Mitt Romney has been ridiculed for saying that illegal immigrants should  
"self-deport." But that seems to be exactly what many of them have been 
doing.  The U.S. government has been sending back more illegals lately, but 
most 
of the  flow to Mexico has been voluntary. 
The Pew analysts hesitate to say so, but their numbers make a strong case  
that we will never again see the flow of Mexicans into this country that we 
saw  between 1970, when there were fewer than 1 million Mexican-born people 
in the  U.S., and 2007, when there were 12.7 million. 
One reason is that Mexico's population growth has slowed way down. Its  
fertility rate fell from 7.3 children per woman in 1970 to 2.4 in 2009, which 
is  just above replacement level. 
Meanwhile, Mexico's economy has grown. Despite sharp currency devaluations 
in  1982 and 1994, its per capita gross domestic product rose 22 percent 
from 1980  to 2010. 
Mexico, like the United States, experienced a recession from 2007 to 2009.  
But since then, Mexico's GDP has grown far faster than ours -- 5.5 percent 
in  2010 and 3.9 percent in 2011. 
Mexico seemed yoked to the U.S. growth rate after passage of the North  
American Free Trade Agreement in 1993. But since the recession it seems yoked 
to  the more robust growth rate of the state with the biggest cross-border 
trade,  Texas. 
An end to the huge flow of immigrants from Mexico has huge implications for 
 U.S. immigration policy. 
Because of our long land border with Mexico (the Rio Grande is a trickle 
most  of the year), it has been far easier to emigrate illegally from Mexico 
than from  any other country. 
As a result, Mexican immigrants tend to be younger, poorer, less educated 
and  less fluent in English than immigrants from other countries. They are 
also more  likely to be illegal -- Mexicans are 30 percent of all immigrants 
but 58 percent  of illegals -- and less likely to become U.S. citizens. 
A continued standstill in Mexican immigration means that the number of  
illegals in the United States will probably continue to decline, even in an  
economic recovery. Children of illegals born in the U.S., who are 
automatically  U.S. citizens, don't add to the illegal numbers. 
And no other country has produced or is likely to produce anything close to 
 the number or share of illegals. 
The central focus of the debate over the so-called comprehensive 
immigration  bills that came to the floor of the Senate in 2006 and 2007 was 
their 
provisions  for legalization of those illegally here -- amnesty, to opponents. 
On the  campaign trail, Barack Obama is promising to push for such 
legislation just as  he promised in 2008. 
But he didn't deliver when Democrats had supermajorities in both houses and 
 is unlikely to get anywhere on this project in a second term. 
It may not matter much. With the Mexican reservoir of potential illegals  
dried up, and with better border enforcement and increased use of the much  
improved e-Verify system in workplaces, the illegal population seems likely 
to  decline. 
The key immigration issue for the future is whether America, like our  
Anglosphere cousins Canada and Australia, will let in more high-skill  
immigrants. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to