Yeah, this is likely to get ugly. :-/

On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:30 AM, [email protected] wrote:

>  
> National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality
>  
>  
> UPDATE!
> Proposed California legislation would limit change therapies for unwanted 
> homosexuality.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Report from NARTH delegation to the Senate Hearings on SB 1172
> We are going to give you a brief overview of our experience at the Senate 
> Committee
> meeting held in Sacramento yesterday. Also, below you will find a link to the 
> 10
> minute recording that we made of most of the important points of the meeting. 
> The
> link is now on YouTube. It is VERY interesting and reveals much of what
> we are up against.
> 
> 1. Senator Lieu read his bill (SB1172).
> 2. Two representatives in support of the bill (who were also sponsors of the 
> bill...NCLR
> (National Center for Lesbian Rights) gave their evidence.
> 3. Two doctors in provisional opposition to the bill (meaning they would only 
> support
> it if amendments were made) spoke. One doctor was from the APA
> (American Psychiatric Association).
> 4. One more speaker (myself) spoke in opposition.
> 5. Three more in opposition, Dr. Popper and Dr. Willis were only allowed to 
> say 
> "nay" to the bill, but Matt Reynolds, a lawyer from Pacific Justice Institute 
> at least
> got to speak for a few seconds in opposition.
> 6. The vote was made to send the bill to the next step, the Judiciary 
> Committee.
> The vote was 5 to 3 in favor of sending it on. Sending it on...
> 
> It was almost unbelievable to sit in this legislative committee room to hear 
> the
> egregious and certainly ridiculous claims of the supporters of this bill. We 
> listened
> to professional people in the therapeutic and legislative communities agree 
> (not
> all) without any rebuttal to unreferenced and profound untruths about SOCE.
> [  Sexual Orientation Change Efforts ]   All you have to do is review the 
> recording
> below or the bill and it's analysis (available on the CA Gov. website) to 
> understand
> how close we are coming to a ban on not just therapeutic SOCE but on ALL forms
> of SOCE, including spiritual intervention.
> 
> Dr. Nicolosi has now responded today to Senator Lieu and demanded corrections 
> of
> some of the falsehoods about Reparative Therapy in this bill. We will be 
> contacting
> Senator Lieu tomorrow to ask that he be true to his word of being "willing to 
> work
> with NARTH and other opposition on amending this bill," which we do not think 
> will
> really happen. NARTH will be contacting Pacific Justice Institute tomorrow as 
> well
> to ask for their vigilance in opposing this bill. We will be tracking the 
> Judiciary
> Committee who will vote nay or yeah in the next step of this bill.
> 
> HOWEVER, the abuses and harm committed by NARTH, claimed by SB1172 supporters,
> was one of the main focal points of this bill and the meeting. As such, and 
> in case 
> it is not abundantly clear, we want to express that now is the time for the 
> NARTH
> Board and NARTH as a whole to react. If we do not take this matter up and 
> fight 
> to end this affront to science, mental health and client rights, then we will 
> sit
> by and watch all the work we've done simply slip away.
> 
> -- 
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to