Relevant History--
Obviously not all of this is consistent with RC. Some, in fact, is
antithetical
to our core principles and values. The point is that we can see
in "Green people" trying to manage their own internal divisions,
common problems in probably all political movements. Their attempted way
to resolve their differences may offer us some lessons. For now, as a
relatively small group, we can proceed on the basis of the give-and-take
of online friendships. But what happens if RC "takes off" and there are
hundreds or even thousands of Radical Centrists ?
Worth thinking about.
Billy
----------------------------------------------------------
Synthesis/Regeneration 27 (Winter 2002)
____________________________________
Thinking Politically
Integrating the Green Political Spectrum within a Party Organization
by Allen Butcher, Denver Green Party
All political organizations are comprised of an internal political
spectrum, and the success of a particular party has much to do with how this
diversity within a political party is managed. The issue of how to integrate
left, center and right Greens is an opportunity for at least our local and
state Green Party organizations to develop in a way that builds upon the
strength of our diversity. If not addressed these different Green perspectives
could cause problems, as we’ve seen with regard to the G/GPUSA vs. ASGP.
So the question is how to use to our advantage this natural dynamic of a
political spectrum within the Green Party.
A suggestion is to create committees within at least the local and state
Party organizations representing each of these three primary Green
perspectives, and give them the autonomy to create projects and programs
respecting
their missions. At the same time, affirm that the Party organization as a
whole, through its bylaws and regular meetings, has oversight and overrule
authority, based on the right of any member to appeal any committee
decision. In this way, people with different Green perspectives can work on
issues
of importance to them, and collaborate as a whole when desired, welcoming
people from other committees to work on a particular committee”s project.
____________________________________
The issue of how to integrate left, center and right Greens is an
opportunity for at least our local and state Green Party organizations…
____________________________________
In the Denver Green Party (DGP) we’ve created three committees called “
managerships,” which are areas of responsibility created by the DGP through
its standard meeting process, with the work of the managerships overseen by
the co-presidents. Managerships may be managed by a single person or by
co-managers, with any member of the DGP having the power to appeal any
managerial decision to the co-presidents. If any member is not satisfied with
the
decision of the co-presidents, they may then appeal the decision at a
scheduled DGP meeting using standard meeting process. These managerships are:
1. Coalition/Diversity Committee (Left Greens, Radical Politics)—which
will tend to hold onto radical interpretations of Green values, with a more
left/feminist/deep ecology/socialist/anarchist leaning activist orientation
2. Campaign Committee (Centrist Greens, Electoral/Realistic Politics)—as it
races to the political center for mass appeal 3. Green Economy Committee or
GECo (Right Greens, Conservative Politics)—as it involves businesses,
government regulation of the economy and taxation.
Here are their job descriptions or committee mandates:
1. Coalition/Diversity Committee:
* Plan and maintain outreach programs including statements of support
for minority and ethnic communities, intentional communities, neighborhood
initiatives, and issues and causes consistent with the Greens 10 Key
Values and the goals of the DGP;
* Contact other organizations and solicit their support for
candidates, initiatives and other campaigns endorsed by the DGP;
* Provide networking services to nonprofit organizations affirming
Green values, and for individuals looking for the resources provided by these
nonprofits.
* Build a bio-regional awareness, identifying as closely as possible
to local environmental quality.
2. Campaign Committee:
* Collect and make available to DGP members information on local and
state electoral, initiative and other campaigns;
* Recommend that the DGP support specific individuals for office,
initiatives and other campaigns, according to criteria to be determined;
* Coordinate support for candidates and those active on initiatives
formally endorsed by the DGP via standard meeting process;
* Recommend that the DGP make statements of support for issues and
campaigns other than those in the electoral or initiative process.
3. Green Economy Committee:
* Identify businesses that are willing to affirm support for the
Greens” 10 Key Values, and network those as a Green chamber of commerce,
perhaps evolving into a 501(c)(6) business association providing advertising,
marketing, recruitment, finance, planning, training or other services;
* Support and sponsor consumer and worker cooperatives, worker-owned
businesses and “open book management” involving employee stock ownership,
financial literacy and full disclosure;
* Provide information on governmental agencies and programs serving
individuals’ and businesses’ needs, and provide information on grassroots
lobbying and legislative activism supporting Green Values;
* Advocate Green Tax Policy creating a system of public finance which
maximizes incentives for the fair distribution of wealth, environmental
protection, basic needs production, provision of adequate government
services and peaceful resolution of territorial conflicts.
Green Commonwealth
A way is needed to express a participatory form of self-governance, a
concern for the general well-being, and a respect and appreciation for
cultural
diversity. The term that seems to do this best is “commonwealth.” Not
only does the term commonwealth refer to the public good or a general
prosperity through self-governance, it is also scalable, referring to either a
local community, a regional association of communities such as a state, a
national organization, or a network of independent nations, on each level
respecting a diversity of cultural traditions.
____________________________________
The idea of the Green Commonwealth is to affirm that all of these
interests work together in a coherent framework, through a committee
structure…
____________________________________
Different people are motivated by different things. Some of us get excited
about electoral campaigns, others of us get excited about Native American
solidarity, union solidarity, gay rights, controlled substances and
industrial hemp, guns, worker-owned businesses and co-ops, environmental
issues,
appropriate technology, nukes, Middle East peace, anti-globalism, and on and
on. The idea of the Green Commonwealth is to affirm that all of these
interests work together in a coherent framework, through a committee structure
providing ways for people who want to do different things to focus upon
what energizes them. A diversity of opportunities for involvement brings more
energy to the Green Party, and the more we are doing in general the more
all of our committees, campaigns and projects will benefit.
Think of it as a dynamic synergy. The more energy we bring in for a
variety of projects the more energy will be available for all of our projects,
because most of us have more than one interest. As we see respect and
involvement on the part of others in the things that are of interest to us
individually, the more we individually will be willing to help with other
people”s
concerns and projects, and the result will be a cultural awareness that we
may call a Green Commonwealth.
The Statement Writing Process
The process within a Green local requiring the three committees, to work
together is that anyone may propose a statement on any issue and submit it
to these three committees. With the Coali-tion/Diversity Committee
preferring a radical left orientation, the Campaign Committee preferring a
politically centrist orientation, and of course the Green Economy Committee
being
the most conservative, the three work out a compromise statement that all can
support, and propose that to the general monthly Greens meeting for
official action. If a particular committee fails to respond in a reasonable
amount of time (like before the next meeting), the issue may be taken directly
to the general meeting. Using email may aid the group writing process.
This structure serves to facilitate work getting done in committees before
issues are presented at a full meeting, and helps to ensure that each wing
of the Green Party has a fair opportunity to see that their agendas are
represented and discussed with regard to particular issues. At the same time,
the process provides experience in working toward a compromise of
disparate views.
If local and state organizations (at least) can develop a process for
honoring and expressing radical, centrist and conservative Green views, and
gain practice in reconciling these, we will have a strong organization that
will be better able to carry us through future issues and challenges. Such a
process provides an official avenue for encouraging and facilitating the
open expression and discussion of different opinions from the three wings of
our party. Giving each faction a recognized method of working together
within the larger organization may serve to ensure that people feel free to
express and are supported in expressing their views, and to ensure that people
respect and work with those having fundamentally different Green
orientations.
An example of the utility of this suggestion is how it would facilitate
progress on the issue presented at the Green Party of Colorado meeting,
spring 2001, having to do with whether we would be willing to negotiate issues
with the local Democratic Party, making agreements to support some of their
initiatives if they would support some of ours (as I understand it). The
meeting was split between standing fast to our values of not making such
political deals, versus being willing to negotiate deals in the way that
politics is generally practiced. Issues such as this could be developed and
reconciled by people representing the radical and the centrist positions
before
going for final decision by the Coordinating Committee or the general Green
Party of Colorado meeting.
Community Control of Cultural, Political and Economic Initiatives
For a local Green organization to adopt the Green Commonwealth designation
it would therefore implicitly be accepting, and hopefully explicitly
affirming, two qualities. First, the ideology of “community control,” via an
organizational structure respecting a balance of autonomy and responsibility
through delegation of authority and appeal processes, perhaps similar to
those used in the Denver Green Party. And second, work to create and
integrate the activities of cultural, electoral and economic committees,
perhaps
using the model of the Denver Green Party’s Coalition/Diversity, Campaign and
Green Economy Committees. This may indeed be what Green Parties have
always sought to do; yet there is a need to express a model for affirming and
perpetuating the original ideals of a Green movement.
Change and growth on the local level may require a basic organizational
paradigm that does not represent an agenda of a national organization,
instead that provides a local Party design that can be made relevant to and
replicated by any local Green organization. Such a relational paradigm
integrating action in cultural, political and economic spheres, while
preserving a
focus on the full range of Green values through integrating them in one
coherent concept, results in what we may call the Green Commonwealth.
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
