About Kos, well, yeah. Except that in this case I think the critique  is on 
target.
With increased popularity of "Radical Centrism" out there, for another  
billionaire
to claim the label  --with no idea what it actually means--   would do none 
of us
any good at all.
 
 
Anyway, I looked for a critique of RC from the Right  --critiques  can be 
helpful--
but could not find any. Guess we are not on any Conservative's radar  yet.
Have you come across anything about RC from  the Right ?
 
Billy
 
 
=======================================
 
 4/27/2012 10:33:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  [email protected] 
writes:

Ah, the Kostards. People that think that way, if I  can use the word 
"think," bother the hell out of me. The center is currently  unoccupied, and if 
he 
thinks that he is in the center, then the delusion is  strong on this one. 
Any one posting there is NOT in the center. Except maybe  of their own mind. 

Although I tend to think that they are out of their  minds. Your mileage 
may vary. 

David

  _   
 
"Free  speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by 
definition,  needs no protection."—Neal  Boortz 



On 4/27/2012 4:02 PM,  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  


Daily Kos
 
Wed Aug 31, 2011 at 11:07 AM PDT 
_Do we really need another  Billionaires Party?_ 
(http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/08/31/1012240/-Do-we-really-need-another-Billionaires-Party-)
 
by LaFeminista
 
 
 
_Some people really just are not paying  attention_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-billionaires-chance-to-save-the-country/2011/08/31/gIQAU
hXtrJ_story.html)  
If you think, as I’ve argued repeatedly, that we need a  “radically 
centrist” third-party presidential candidate to shake things  up, and to force 
both political parties to confront the myriad issues that  their interest 
groups and ideological litmus tests bar them from treating  honestly, then 
there 
are only two ways for that to happen in 2012. Like it  or not, both depend 
on wealthy Americans investing in creative political  change.
This article is probably the most idiotic I have read in a long time. 
Radically centrist? One party has gone off the edge and the other is  
intent on appeasing them and yet we need another in the already overcrowded  
the 
center? 
The first scenario is that the new group Americans Elect  succeeds in 
securing ballot access in all fifty states,
Yah really.... then they are bought out I suppose? In a not so hostile  
centrist takeover perhaps? Money buys everything, hmm? 
The political establishment is seriously underestimating the  potential of 
Americans Elect to become a disruptive force in our  politics.
Whoopee radical centrists just what the doctor ordered.

The second option is that a patriotic billionaire with the  means to secure 
ballot access on his or her own pursues an independent  campaign.
Owing allegiance to Wall St perhaps; and the profit margin no doubt. 
Now could someone tell me what the fuck this means? 
Some wealthy patriots in the “far center”
Bloody hell that is a stretch. 
If you’re rich, serious about changing the world and think our  two party 
tyranny has become part of the problem, there’s no better time  to invest in 
disruptive political innovation. The country you save may be  your own.
Yah way to go billionaires, perhaps the Koch brothers might like to play  
another hand of "buy a country"? 
Ye gawds, we already have one whole party and at least half of the other  
up for sale to the highest bidder, now we get another pick and mix? 
The Billionaires have enough representation as it is,  it's the rest  of us 
that only have one vote that have the problem. 
What we need is campaign finance reform and not yet another  auction.

-- 




-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to