Washington Examiner
 
 
 
 
Voters understand the immigration  debate
Scott Rasmussen 

April 27,  2012 -- 5:38 PM 

 
As the U.S. Supreme Court wrestles with the Obama administration's 
challenge  of Arizona's crackdown on illegal immigration, the overall issue of 
immigration  remains misunderstood by both political parties in Washington. 
Many Washington Republicans confuse voter opposition to illegal immigration 
 with opposition to all immigration. Their remarks often contain an ugly 
tone  toward those who want to come to America. 
Many Washington Democrats confuse public respect for hardworking immigrants 
 with a belief that borders and immigration laws don't matter. Their 
remarks  often contain an ugly tone toward those who believe the nation's 
immigration  laws should be enforced. 
On the issues before the court, most voters tend to side with the state of  
Arizona rather than the federal government. Fifty-nine percent of voters  
nationwide, for example, agree with one of the law's most controversial  
provisions, that police officers should routinely check the immigration status  
of those they pull over for other violations. Most voters would like to have 
a  law like Arizona's in their own state. 
But that says more about voter respect for the law than it does about the  
immigration issue. Voters figure if there's a law on the books, the 
government  should enforce it. 
That's why, among voters who are angry about the immigration issue, 83  
percent are angry at the federal government rather than the illegal immigrants  
themselves. It's also why two-thirds of voters think those who knowingly 
hire  illegal immigrants are a bigger problem than the people they employ. 
Simply put,  most Americans are angry at those who would entice others to break 
the law.  They're not angry at people who are willing to work hard to 
provide for their  families. 
It's a little bit like the public desire to go after drug pushers rather 
than  occasional users of illegal drugs. 
Still, there's another reason for the disconnect between official 
Washington  and the American people on immigration. 
In Washington, the entire focus of the immigration debate is on how to deal 
 with those already living here illegally. For voters, this is a secondary  
concern. The bigger concern is how to secure the border so future 
immigrants  enter the county according to the rules. Routinely, in surveys for 
years, 
60  percent or more of voters say securing the borders is a higher priority 
than  legalizing the status of the illegal immigrants who are here now. 
Once voters are convinced that illegal immigration is a thing of the past, 
it  will be easier to address the status of those in the country already. 
But voters don't believe the federal government has any interest in 
securing  the border. In fact, most believe the policies of the federal 
government 
are  designed to encourage illegal immigration. This offends voters who want 
to  respect the rule of law. If immigration laws — or any laws — are 
routinely  ignored, then the government loses credibility. 
If the laws are enforced, 61 percent of voters favor a welcoming policy 
that  lets anybody come to America except national security threats, criminals 
and  those who would live off the U.S. welfare system. All who would like to 
work  hard and pursue the American Dream are welcome. 
The bottom line is that voters remember what many in Washington often 
forget:  America is a nation of immigrants — and of laws. The American people 
want both  traditions to be honored.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to