Re: EMF pulsed Re: [RC] PS

[David R. Block]

Title: "Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech

http://www.onesecondafter.com/pb/wp_194d9c9d/wp_194d9c9d.html http://www.futurescience.com/X5DNA/X5DNA.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse http://afteremp.com/ There are some starters on EMP. David "Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."—Neal Boortz   On 5/1/2012 11:00 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote: Hi Billy, Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2012, at 16:47, bil...@aol.com wrote: 100 % certainty, if one hit us with no warning it would blow out at least half of the transformers in the country. Maybe more like 80% plus. Is that really true? I'd like to see.a source cited. Like with EMF pulses, there's a lot of claims that sound suspicious to me. That much energy might scramble radios, but if it was really strong enough to burn out high-voltage transformers across an area larger than a city, I'd think -we- would all be fried too. In which case it doesn't really matter. :-) E -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <RadicalCentrism@googlegroups.com> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org