Ernie :
Most of the article makes excellent sense. But  here is a statement about 
which
I could not possibly DISagree more :
 
 
“Today knowledge is ubiquitous, constantly changing, growing exponentially…
  Today knowledge is free. It’s like air, it’s like water. It’s become a  
commodity… There’s no competitive advantage today in knowing more than the  
person next to you. The world doesn’t care what you know. What the world 
cares  about is what you can do with what you know.”
 
To do anything well requires content mastery. Anything, unless you are  
talking about recess
in grade school, or lunch hour in high school.
 
I will start with the social sciences and history. These are absolutely  
content driven, you
simply have got to know all the facts in the world, or about the history of 
 Europe or Asia
or the United States, or you are nothing with nothing to say that is worth  
hearing.
 
But the same surely is true for chemistry or physics or biology or computer 
 science,
wouldn't you say ? Or math, or psychology, or geology, or even the arts  
--to the extent
that you really need to know all the tricks of sculpture to create a statue 
 or a casting,
or all the tricks of painting with acrylics, and so forth. I mean, I   had 
a class in drawing
at the U of Illinois in which we learned everything conceivable about how  
to use
pencils to draw, and a good number of students did some pretty darned  
creative 
things with so simple a medium.
 
I'm all for interdisciplinary approaches, needless to say, and think that  
strictly
staying within a field stultifies creativity and innovation, but not for  
one minute
should content be neglected. That kind of advice is intellectually  
suicidal.
 
Sure, it is a lot of work to turn your brain into an encyclopedia, a huge  
investment of time
and a lot of effort, but you've got to do so or you are not professional.  
And I'm sure glad
that my doctor took the trouble to learn medicine thoroughly.
 
Billy
 
=================================
 
5/7/2012 6:49:33 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]  
writes:

Absolutely.


_http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericaswallow/2012/04/25/creating-innovators/_ 
(http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericaswallow/2012/04/25/creating-innovators/) 



 
Creating Innovators: Why America's Education System Is  Obsolete
 
America’s last competitive advantage — its ability to innovate — is at 
risk  as a result of the country’s lackluster education system, according to  
research by Harvard Innovation _Education_ (http://www.forbes.com/education/) 
 Fellow _Tony Wagner_ (http://www.tonywagner.com/) . 
Taking the stage at Skillshare’s _Penny Conference_ 
(http://www.skillshare.com/penny#/) ,  Wagner pointed out the _skills it takes 
to become an 
innovator_ 
(http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericaswallow/2012/04/19/innovators-dna-hal-gregersen-interview/)
 , the downfalls of  America’s current education 
system, and how parents, teachers, mentors, and  employers can band together to 
create innovators. 
American schools educate to fill children with knowledge — instead they  
should be focusing on developing students’ innovation skills and motivation to 
 succeed, he says: 
“Today knowledge is ubiquitous, constantly changing, growing  exponentially…
 Today knowledge is free. It’s like air, it’s like water. It’s  become a 
commodity… There’s no competitive advantage today in knowing more  than the 
person next to you. The world doesn’t care what you know. What the  world 
cares about is what you can do with what you know.”
Knowledge that children are encouraged to soak up in American schools — the 
 memorization of planets, state capitals, the Periodic Table of Elements — 
can  only take students so far. But “skill and will” determine a child’s 
ability to  think outside of the box, he says. 
Over two year of research involving interviews with executives, college  
teachers, community leaders, and recent graduates, Wagner defined the skills  
needed for Americans to stay competitive in an increasingly globalized  
workforce. As lined out in his book, “_The Global Achievement Gap_ 
(http://www.tonywagner.com/resources/the-global-achievement-gap) ,” that set of 
core 
competencies  that every student must master before the end of high school is: 
- Critical thinking and problem solving (the ability to ask the right  
questions) 
-  Collaboration across networks and leading by influence 
- Agility and adaptability 
- Initiative and entrepreneurialism 
- Accessing and analyzing information 
- Effective written and oral communication 
- Curiosity and imagination 
For his latest book, “_Creating Innovators:  The Making of Young People Who 
Will Change The World_ (http://www.creatinginnovators.com/) ,” Wagner has 
extended  his studies to address the problem of how we teach students these 
skills. He  has come to the conclusion that our country’s economic problems 
are based in  its education system.
 
 
 
 
 
 
6224 

 
1170 

 
19 

 
279 





Page 2 of 2 
“We’ve created an economy based on people spending money they do not have  
to buy things they may not need, threatening the planet in the process,” he 
 says. “We have to transition from a consumer-driven economy to an  
innovation-driven economy.” 
In an effort to discern teaching and parenting patterns, Wagner interviewed 
 innovators in their 20s, followed by interviews with their parents and the 
 influential teachers and mentors in the students’ lives. He found stunning 
 similarities between the teaching styles and goals he encountered with 
these  influential teachers at all levels of education and concludes, “The 
culture of  schooling as we all know it is radically at odds with the culture 
of 
learning  that produces innovators.” He identified five ways in which 
America’s  education system is stunting innovation: 
1. Individual achievement is the focus: Students spend a  bulk of their 
time focusing on improving their GPAs — school is a competition  among peers. “
But innovation is a team sport,” says Wagner. “Yes, it requires  some 
solitude and reflection, but fundamentally problems are too complex to  
innovate 
or solve by oneself.” 
2. Specialization is celebrated and rewarded: High school  curriculum is 
structured using Carnegie units, a system that is 125 years old,  says Wagner. 
He says the director of talent at _Google_ 
(http://www.forbes.com/companies/google/)  once told him, “If  there’s one 
thing that educators need to 
understand, it’s that you can neither  understand nor solve problems within the 
context and bright lines of subject  content.” Wagner declares, “Learning 
to be an innovator is about learning to  cross disciplinary boundaries and 
exploring problems and their solutions from  multiple perspectives.” 
3. Risk aversion is the norm: “We penalize mistakes,” says  Wagner. “The 
whole challenge in schooling is to figure out what the teacher  wants. And 
the teachers have to figure out what the superintendent wants or  the state 
wants. It’s a compliance-driven, risk-averse culture.” Innovation,  on the 
other hand, is grounded in taking risks and learning via trial and  error. 
Educators could take a note from design firm IDEO with its mantra of  “Fail 
early, fail often,” says Wagner. And at Stanford’s Institute of Design,  he 
says they are considering ideas like, “We’re thinking F is the new A.”  
Without failure, there is no innovation. 
4. Learning is profoundly passive: For 12 to 16 years, we  learn to consume 
information while in school, says Wagner. He suspects that  our schooling 
culture has actually turned us into the “good little consumers”  that we 
are. Innovative learning cultures teach about creating, not consuming,  he 
says. 
5. Extrinsic incentives drive learning: “Carrots and  sticks, As and Fs,” 
Wagner remarks. Young innovators are  intrinsically motivated, he says. They 
aren’t interested in grading  scales and petty reward systems. Parents and 
teachers can encourage innovative  thinking by nurturing the curiosity and 
inquisitiveness of young people,  Wagner says. As he describes it, it’s a 
pattern of “play to passion to  purpose.” Parents of innovators encouraged 
their children to play in more  exploratory ways, he says. “Fewer toys, more 
toys without batteries, more  unstructured time in their day.” Those children 
grow up to find passions, not  just academic achievement, he says. “And that 
passion matures to a profound  sense of purpose. Every young person I 
interviewed wants to make a difference  in the world, put a ding in the 
universe.”
 
“”We have to transition to an innovation-driven culture, an  
innovation-driven society,” says Wagner. “A consumer society is bankrupt —  
it’s not 
coming back. To do that, we’re going to have to work with young  people — as 
parents, as teachers, as mentors, and as employers — in very  different 
ways. They want to, you want to become innovators. And we as a  country need 
the 
capacity to solve more different kinds of problems in more  ways. It 
requires us to have a very different vision of education, of teaching  and 
learning for the 21st century. It requires us to have a sense of urgency  about 
the 
problem that needs to be solved.” 
Wagner is not suggesting we change a few processes and update a few  
manuals. He says, “The system has become obsolete. It needs reinventing, not  
reforming.”



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to