Title: "Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech
Billy,

Say what you will about warm fuzzy feelings o meters, but I'm not ready for more "Feeling your pain." (Although the Balanced Budgets were a nice touch.) I would rather that neither me or my candidate have much pain to feel. I see where a convict in the Federal Pen here in Texarkana TX got 41 % of the Democratic Primary vote against Obama in West Virginia. We now have a convict with delegates to the Democratic National Convention.

I think I'm going to need more popcorn.

I think you nailed the most effective communicators in the WH this century.

David

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."—Neal Boortz

 


On 5/9/2012 1:13 AM, [email protected] wrote:
David :
 
So far there have been few presidents who have used the "power to persuade"
--the Bully Pulpit--   very effectively.  I'd say that the only ones in recent history
have been TR himself,  FDR, Eisenhower, JFK, and RR.  Several candidates,
if they had been elected , might have had the skills for this ;   Bryan, Stevenson, Buchanan,
Huckabee ( in 2008, since then he has bombed-out ), and Newt come to mind.
 
The best at it was either JFK or FDR, although in his own way Reagan
had the ability to sway people, not so much with substance but with
reassurance. TR made the most use of the pulpit and went on all kinds
of speaking tours to give speeches and sometimes major policy statements.
 
But, yeah, the current occupant of the WH has even stopped giving press conferences.
Instead it has been campaign mode almost from day # 1 onward. He thinks of
himself as MLK, which is delusional.  Basically BHO doesn't know what
he is doing, he still is a rank amateur. His base won't jump ship but even
some of them aren't happy. I simply can't see him getting anything like
the totals he pulled in 2008.
 
If only the GOP had a candidate who inspired even a little enthusiasm.
On the Warm-Fuzzy-Feelings-O-Meter, zero to 100, the dial, for me,
hardly budges above  0.025 %.
 
Republican version of Al Gore. Not quite that bad, but close.
 
O, hell.
 
Billy
 
 
============================================
 
 
5/8/2012 8:51:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
You may want to avoid the activities of the current occupant, who has become so ubiquitous on TV that I turn the damn thing off when he comes on. He has, IMHO, turned the Bully pulpit into the Bull**** pulpit.

David
 

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."—Neal Boortz

 


On 5/8/2012 2:11 PM, [email protected] wrote:
A Radical Centrist president can campaign for candidates he favors
and can campaign against candidates he wants to remove from office.
 
An RC president can order intelligence services to investigate criminality
or threats to the United States. Depending on circumstances this might
mean investigating lending practices by large banks, or such practices
as reverse mortgages in which banks have a license to steal real property
for a fraction of real value, can investigate labor unions guilty of unfair
practices, can seek to uncover criminality among political movements
like Neo-Nazis, Neo-Communists, and Anarchists, and much else,
all of which have political dimensions. This includes investigating
criminal religious organizations like the MSA, Muslim Students
Association, with its ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
 
An RC president could seek to create a mass movement in favor of
Radical Centrism. Many opportunities for this exist, such as invitations to
the WH for RC leaders, and publicity that would result, granting interviews
with RC publications or to talk show hosts, and so forth.
 
An RC president could propose legislation which could be introduced to
the Congress by any supporters he may have in either chamber. That, by itself,
would hardly ensure passage, but with effective WH campaigning on behalf
of proposed legislation some bills ought to be voted on and approved.
 
The WH can review any and all budget proposals favored by both parties
and offer critiques of as many parts of these budgets and desired. In the process
the president could offer suggestions for resolving budget conflicts.
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
 
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to