Would this happen if Bill Gates was still the active CEO ?
Somehow I doubt it. That his wife has remade him into
Mother Theresa, Mark II, is ridiculous.  Doesn't MS
know what it is doing any more ?
 
Bill Gates has been "pussywhipped" out of all recognition.
 
Billy
 
========================================================
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PCMAG.com
 
 
The Great Upgrade Upheaval
For those with older computers,  upgrading to Windows 8 will be more 
trouble than it's  worth.
 
    *    (http://www.pcmag.com/author-bio/john-c.-dvorak) By _John C.  
Dvorak_ (http://www.pcmag.com/author-bio/john-c.-dvorak) 
    *   October 4, 2012


 
The final rollout of _Windows 8_ (http://www.pcmag.com/windows-8/)   is now 
beginning and it will be loaded on all the new machines. I can assure  you, 
though, that just as with the transition from XP to Vista, nobody will want 
 to upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 8. What's the point? Windows 7 works 
fine  and Windows 8 is odd. 
I already know _trying to upgrade_ 
(http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2407095,00.asp)   from XP/Vista/7 to 
Windows 8 will be a headache. Nothing 
will work correctly.  You'll have to track down updates and with old software 
from forgotten vendors,  you may never get to upgrade your applications. 
Also, upgrading to newer operating systems too often requires so many  
reinstalls of your favorite packages that it is not worth the aggravation.  
 (http://www.pcmag.com/category2/0,2806,2383507,00.asp) The upgrade  
barrier, which mostly stems form the Windows registry architecture, must have  
cost Microsoft billions of dollars. I still have two XP machines around the  
house and I am totally reluctant to upgrade to anything new. 
There are at least a dozen programs that I would need to reinstall but I 
have  no idea where the original disks or serial numbers are. Even if I was 
that  organized, things just get moved around. Some downloadable software is 
on the  machine but the serial number is somewhere else. 
None of this would be so problematic if Microsoft abandoned the registry 
and  put individual programs into easy-to-move folders.
 
Besides the issue with the registry, there is the problem with the AppData  
folder. This contains odd data that the program needs to operate. It's in a 
 folder with other programs that need to have what amounts to "cookies" in 
a  bunch of folders in the AppData folder. You never know what is in there. 
Meanwhile, the programs themselves are in the Programs folder. Why couldn't 
 the AppData be in there with the programs? You know, instead of being 
scattered  all around the machine? 
In the early days, one of the best things about the Microsoft DOS when  
compared with the Macintosh was that there was simply a logic to everything. 
You  didn't have components of every program scattered all over the place with 
no  rhyme, reason, or consistency. That slowly deteriorated when Windows 
took  over. 
Some of this is due to greed. Microsoft knows that you'll probably buy a  
newer version of Office if you cannot simply move the product to a new 
machine  by copying one folder with everything.  
In fact, the company loses the opportunity to sell more copies of the 
newest  OS since everyone quickly learns that upgrading wrecks your workflow. 
So, 
nobody  ever wants to upgrade and Windows 8 will be no exception. Just you  
watch.
 
 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to