Interesting concept :  How can we make online discussion of philosophy
productive and not waste time in the  process ?  That is, how can we make
online discussion of Radical Centrist  philosophy productive and do so
in such a way that the usefulness of  such discussion is evident
to all concerned without waiting very  long to get the idea ?
 
Probably we need a "problems to be  solved" approach, some specific tasks
that can actually be undertaken  expeditiously, with the goal of practical
outcomes as part of the  conversation.
 
Any other ideas on the subject  ?
 
Billy
 
 
=====================================
 
 
 
 
from the site :  In  Socrates' Wake
 
Oct 1, 2012
 
 
“Philosophy Discussions Online: How to Make them  Productive, Effective and 
Efficient” 
 


 
The American Association of Philosophy Teachers  (AAPT) invites proposals 
for its session “Philosophy Discussions Online: How to  Make them Productive, 
Effective and Efficient” at the upcoming Pacific APA  meeting in San 
Francisco from March 27 to 31, 2013. 


Papers are solicited that present ways to achieve  meaningful online 
discussions in either Philosophy courses taught completely  online or in 
traditional Philosophy courses with an online-discussion component.  Specific 
case 
examples that use formats such as discussion threads, blogs,  wikis, chat 
rooms, or even argument mapping software are welcome. Reference to  particular 
pedagogic theories and/or approaches that ground the instructor’s way  of 
handling discussion would also be much appreciated. 


Submissions are encouraged from teachers at all  levels of university and 
college teaching—that is, teachers of Philosophy  courses in 2-year and 
4-year programs as well as in MA and PhD programs. 


Proposals should be of presentations that are no  more than 20 minutes; are 
oriented towards the practical implementation of the  ideas presented; and 
preferably, are interactive with the audience.  Presentations may be made by 
individuals or by panels. 


The AAPT two-hour session will be composed of three  20-minute 
presentations followed by one hour of discussion with the  audience.


Proposals should be no longer than 300 words and  should be submitted in 
either Word or PDF format to Bill Anelli at [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected])  and Tziporah Kasachkoff at [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) . 


Deadline for submission of proposals is October  15th, 2012.


-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to