Hi Chris,

On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:52 AM, "Chris Hahn" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the Republican snob effect was probably a factor, but only a small 
> factor, in turning off the new electorate... the young and the non-white-male 
> voters.  The Donald certainly did not help Romney with his showboating $5 M 
> offer.  I think the out-of-touch-with-the-new-electorate Republican social 
> and immigration platforms had a much bigger role than the psychological snob 
> effect.  Voters actually do look at issues.  The new electorate looked at the 
> voters and cast their votes for Obama.

I'm not sure I can distinguish the two.  Romney's out-of-touchness was the 
dominant narrative for the entire political season, and reflected in both his 
policy positions (or lack thereof) and his personal gaffes.

-- Ernie P.


>  
> Chris
>  
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dr. Ernest Prabhakar
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:40 AM
> To: Centroids Discussions
> Subject: [RC] How The Donald Helped Re-elect the President | Psychology Today
>  
> A very different analysis, but probably accurate.  I didn't help that 
> Romney's character weakness are somewhat endemic to Republicans these days...
> 
> 
> http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/who-we-are/201211/how-the-donald-helped-re-elect-the-president
> 
> How The Donald Helped Re-elect the President
> 
> The Republican side unwisely went after Barrack Obama's status. He is 
> un-American, they said. Donald Trump attacked Obama's birth certificate. In a 
> column in the WSJ the normally insightful Peggy Noonan wrote that Obama had 
> fallen far since 2008. [Hey, Peggy he has fallen to the status of re-elected 
> President. What are you talking about?] Mitt himself treated Obama at times 
> in a dismissive manner (eg, look at the tone he used in the third debate when 
> he told Obama not to interrupt and wait his turn.)
> 
> The uppity quality of the Republican effort to knock down the status of the 
> President led to a backlash. Nobody likes a snob.  This demeaning attitude 
> helped motivate the long, long lines of minority voters.  Had Mitt & Co. 
> corrected for their blind spot on the basic desire for status -- that is, had 
> they been more careful not to project a superior attitude toward Obama -- 
> maybe those long lines of voters would have been smaller.  Romney might have 
> won if early on he had told The Donald to shut up, denounced the birthers, 
> and made it clear that the President would not be demeaned in any way. 
> 
> We all have blind spots, of course. Obama's overconfdent nature played a 
> significant role in his trying to do too much in his first term.  Mitt may 
> have a tendency toward snobbery under stress, but he has numerous character 
> strengths, too.  On an intrpersonal level, he seems very likeable.  I am not 
> writing this to judge him.  I am making a psychological point in the election 
> analysis you are unlikely to see made by other analysts.  It was the long 
> lines -- the 12th man in football terms -- that sunk Romney. 
> 
> So here is the psychological lesson of the election. If you are a snob at 
> your core, you have to hide it better to win a national election. Too many 
> times the "demeaning" attitude (he is un-American; he is lazy; sit down and 
> shut up) was visible and it motivated Obama's supporters. 
> 
>  
> 
> Tags: aggressive nature, backlash, barrack obama, birth certificate, blind 
> spot, blind spots, cooperative nature, donald trump, insightful, intense 
> stress, killer instinct, minority voters, peggy noonan, poor job, reiss, 
> republican effort, republican side, superior attitude,thoughts and feelings, 
> wsj
> 
> 
> -- 
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
> 
> -- 
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to