Baptist Press
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE GIGLIO IMBROGLIO -- The public  inauguration of a new Moral McCarthyism

Posted on Jan 11, 2013 | by R. Albert Mohler Jr. 
 
    *   
This article was originally posted  Thursday, Jan. 10.

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (BP) -- A new chapter in America's  moral revolution came 
today as Atlanta pastor Louie Giglio withdrew from giving  the benediction at 
President Obama's second inaugural ceremony. In a statement  released to 
the White House and the Presidential Inaugural Committee, Giglio  said he 
withdrew because of the furor that emerged yesterday (Jan. 9) after a  liberal 
watchdog group revealed that almost 20 years ago he had preached a  sermon in 
which he had stated that homosexuality is a sin and that the "only way  out 
of a homosexual lifestyle ... is through the healing power of  Jesus."

In other words, a Christian pastor has been effectively  disinvited from 
delivering an inaugural prayer because he believes and teaches  Christian 
truth.

The fact that Giglio was actually disinvited was made  clear in a statement 
from Addie Whisenant of the Presidential Inaugural  Committee:

"We were not aware of Pastor Giglio's past comments at the  time of his 
selection, and they don't reflect our desire to celebrate the  strength and 
diversity of our country at this inaugural. Pastor Giglio was asked  to deliver 
the benediction in large part because of his leadership in combating  human 
trafficking around the world. As we now work to select someone to deliver  
the benediction, we will ensure their beliefs reflect this administration's  
vision of inclusion and acceptance for all Americans."

That statement is,  in effect, an embarrassed apology for having invited 
Louie Giglio in the first  place. Whisenant's statement apologizes for the 
Presidential Inaugural  Committee's failure to make certain that their 
selection had never, at any time,  for any reason, believed that homosexuality 
is 
less than a perfectly acceptable  lifestyle. The committee then promised to 
repent and learn from their failure,  committing to select a replacement who 
would "reflect this administration's  vision of inclusion and acceptance."

The imbroglio over Louie Giglio is  the clearest evidence of the new Moral 
McCarthyism of our sexually "tolerant"  age. During the infamous McCarthy 
hearings, witnesses would be asked, "Are you  now or have you ever been a 
member of the Communist Party?"

In the  version now to be employed by the Presidential Inaugural Committee, 
the question  will be: "Are you now or have you ever been one who believes 
that homosexuality  (or bisexuality, or transsexualism, etc.) is anything 
less than morally  acceptable and worthy of celebration?"

Louie Giglio, pastor of Atlanta's  Passion City Church, also is founder of 
the Passion movement that brings tens of  thousands of Christian young 
people together to hear Giglio, along with speakers  such as John Piper. They 
urge a rising generation of young Christians to make a  passionate commitment 
to Christ. In recent years, the movement also has sought  to raise awareness 
and activism among young Christians on the issue of sex  trafficking. It was 
that activism that caught the attention of both President  Obama and the 
Presidential Inaugural Committee.

Note carefully that both  the White House and the committee were ready to 
celebrate Giglio's activism on  sex trafficking, but all that was swept away 
by the Moral McCarthyism on the  question of homosexuality.

Two other dimensions of this story also demand  attention. First, we should 
note that Louie Giglio has not been known lately for  taking any stand on 
the issue of homosexuality. To the contrary, Giglio's own  statement 
withdrawing from the invitation made this clear:

"Due to a  message of mine that has surfaced from 15-20 years ago, it is 
likely that my  participation, and the prayer I would offer, will be dwarfed 
by those seeking to  make their agenda the focal point of the inauguration. 
Clearly, speaking on this  issue has not been in the range of my priorities 
in the past fifteen years.  Instead, my aim has been to call people to 
ultimate significance as we make much  of Jesus Christ."

A fair-minded reading of that statement indicates that  Pastor Giglio has 
strategically avoided any confrontation with the issue of  homosexuality for 
at least 15 years. The issue "has not been in the range of my  priorities," 
he said. Given the Bible's insistence that sexual morality is  inseparable 
from our "ultimate significance as we make much of Jesus Christ,"  this must 
have been a difficult strategy. It is also a strategy that is very  
attractive to those who want to avoid being castigated as intolerant or  
homophobic. 
As this controversy makes abundantly clear, it is a failed strategy.  Louie 
Giglio was cast out of the circle of the acceptable simply because a  
liberal watchdog group found one sermon he preached almost 20 years ago. If a  
preacher has ever taken a stand on biblical conviction, he risks being exposed 
 decades after the fact. Anyone who teaches at any time, to any degree, 
that  homosexual behavior is a sin is now to be cast out.

Second, we should  note that Pastor Giglio's sermon was, as we would expect 
and hope, filled with  grace and the promise of the Gospel. Giglio did not 
just state that homosexuals  are sinners -- he made clear that every single 
human being is a sinner, in need  of the redemption that is found only in 
Jesus Christ. "We've got to say to the  homosexuals, the same thing that I say 
to you and that you would say to me ...  It's not easy to change, but it's 
possible to change," he preached. He pointed  his congregation, gay and 
straight, to "the healing power of Jesus." He called  his entire congregation 
to 
repent and come to Christ by faith.

That is  the quintessential Christian Gospel. That is undiluted biblical 
truth. Those  words are the consensus of the church for over 2,000 years and 
the firm belief  held by the vast majority of Christians around the world 
today.

The  Presidential Inaugural Committee and the White House have now declared 
 historical, biblical Christianity to be out of bounds, casting it off the  
inaugural program as an embarrassment. By its newly articulated standard, 
any  preacher who holds to the faith of the church for the last 2,000 years 
is  persona non grata. By this standard, no Roman Catholic prelate or priest 
can  participate in the ceremony. No evangelical who holds to biblical 
orthodoxy is  welcome. The vast majority of Christians around the world have 
been 
disinvited.  Mormons and the rabbis of Orthodox Judaism are out. Any Muslim 
imam who could  walk freely in Cairo would be denied a place on the 
inaugural program. Billy  Graham, who participated in at least 10 presidential 
inaugurations, is welcome  no more. Rick Warren, who incited a similar 
controversy when he prayed at  President Obama's first inauguration, is way out 
of 
bounds. In the span of just  four years, the rules are fully changed.

The gauntlet was thrown down  yesterday, and the ax fell today. Wayne 
Besen, founder of the activist group  Truth Wins Out, told The New York Times 
yesterday: "It is imperative that Giglio  clarify his remarks and explain 
whether he has evolved on gay rights, like so  many other faith and political 
leaders. It would be a shame to select a preacher  with backward views on LBGT 
people at a moment when the nation is rapidly moving  forward on our issues."

And there you have it -- anyone who has ever  believed that homosexuality 
is morally problematic in any way must now offer  public repentance and 
evidence of having "evolved" on the question. This is the  language that 
President Obama used of his own "evolving" position on same-sex  marriage. This 
is 
what is now openly demanded of Christians today. If you want  to avoid being 
thrown off the program, you had better learn to evolve fast, and  repent in 
public.

This is precisely what biblical Christians cannot do.  While seeking to be 
gentle in spirit and ruthlessly Gospel-centered in speaking  of any sin, we 
cannot cease to speak of sin as sin. To do so is not only to deny  the 
authority of Scripture, not only to reject the moral consensus of the  saints, 
but it undermines the Gospel itself. The Gospel makes no sense and is  robbed 
of its saving power, if sin is denied as sin.

An imbroglio is a  painful and embarrassing conflict. The imbroglio 
surrounding Louie Giglio is not  only painful, it is revealing. We now see the 
new 
Moral McCarthyism in its  undisguised and unvarnished reality. If you are a 
Christian, get ready for the  question you will now undoubtedly face: "Do 
you now or have you ever believed  that homosexuality is a sin?" There is 
nowhere to hide.
--30--
R. Albert  Mohler Jr. is president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary 
in Louisville,  Ky

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to