io9  WE COME FROM THE  FUTURE
 
 
 
 
The Evolutionary Biology of Star Trek
 
Annalee Newitz  


One  of the big mysteries of human evolution is what happened to all the 
humans who  shared the planet with Homo sapiens for hundreds of thousands of 
years.  While Homo sapiens was evolving in Africa, there were also 
tool-making  hominins in Europe and Asia, known as Homo erectus, the 
Denisovans, and  
the Neanderthals. And let's not even get started on Homo floresiensis,  the 
so-called Hobbit people. Did all those human groups meet at some point? Did  
they interbreed or kill each other? Is it even appropriate to call them all 
 human, or were some human and some animals? 
Star Trek has the answers to these questions. And they are just as tangled  
and frustrating in science fiction as they are in real evolutionary 
science.  

 
The Most Annoying Star Trek Episode Ever Written 
Even if you aren't a Star Trek fan, you are probably aware of the  
much-loathed Star Trek: TNG episode "The Chase," where we learn that  humans, 
Romulans, Klingons and every other humanoid we've met are in fact _from a 
common 
ancestor whom  we'll call the Doughfaces_ 
(http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/The_Chase)  (you can see why from this 
picture). Through a  series of 
improbable events, the Enterprise eventually finds a secret  holographic 
message 
from the now-long-gone Doughface representative, who  says: 
We knew that one day we would be gone, and nothing of us would survive - so 
 we left you. Our scientists seeded the primordial oceans of many worlds, 
where  life was in its infancy. The seed codes directed your evolution toward 
a  physical form resembling ours: this body you see before you, which is of 
 course shaped as yours is shaped, for you are the end result. The seed 
codes  also contain this message, which is scattered in fragments on many 
different  worlds.
OK, yes, this is absurd and you can see why people hate this episode. As 
_Peggy  Kolm has already pointed out brilliantly on Biology In Science 
Fiction_ 
(http://blog.sciencefictionbiology.com/2006/11/panspermia-in-star-trek.html) , 
it  makes no sense that every group would have evolved the same way on 
a variety of  planets, and you can't "direct" evolution with "seed codes." 
But if you ignore all that, you wind up with a pretty interesting portrait 
of  evolution in Star Trek that happens in some ways to mirror our own on 
Earth.  First, we already know that some groups of aliens can interbreed. 
There is the  half-human, half-Vulcan Spock; there is the half-human, 
half-Klingon B'elanna  Torres, the half-human, half-Betazoid Troi, and many 
other 
minor characters too.  This only makes sense if they are all descended from the 
Doughfaces, though  there are some episodes where it's suggested that the 
mixed-race people are the  product of technological tinkering. 
So what does this have to do with human evolution? 
 
The Common Ancestor 
Humans and our ancestors are called hominins (_here's  a good explanation 
of why_ 
(http://io9.com/5892387/the-last-time-we-redefined-what-it-means-to-be-human) 
), while the greater group of humans and apes are  called hominids. 
All the groups I mentioned earlier are undeniably hominins, and  all came 
from the same common ancestor as Homo sapiens did — the  Doughfaces of 
humanity are called Homo ergaster or Homo  erectus. Obviously Neanderthals 
didn't 
get their Romulan-esque brow ridges  from _some  kind of panspermia event 
with "directed evolution"_ 
(http://io9.com/5918189/could-panspermia-have-created-life-on-earth) . Instead, 
different human  groups _simply left  Africa at 
different times_ (http://io9.com/5774949/how-did-humans-really-evolve) , 
scattering across Eurasia. Because Homo  erectus left Africa a million years 
before Homo sapiens did, the two groups  evolved separately for quite a 
while. Same goes for the ancestor of the  Neanderthals and Denisovans, who also 
left before H. sapiens did. 
So humanity's million-year trek into Europe, Asia, and Australia was 
somewhat  like what happened to the Doughface's progeny on many different 
planets. 
They  started out as one species, but as they settled down in different 
regions of  Earth, they began to look quite unlike each other. I've always 
found it amusing  that what would have probably identified different human 
groups 200 thousand  years ago would have been brow ridges and height — the 
same 
two features that  are used in the Star Trek universe to make people look 
"alien." Of course,  Denisovans wouldn't have had a silly, crinkle-cut french 
fry nose like a  Bajoran. But Neanderthals would have had a thicker brow and 
receding chin than  modern humans, while the Hobbits were significantly 
smaller than a typical  Homo sapiens. 
When Homo sapiens met the Neanderthals for the first time, would it  have 
been like humans meeting the Klingons? Quite possibly, yes. Especially the  
part where they look slightly different and speak different languages, but 
are  nevertheless able to have children together and engage in extensive trade 
back  and forth (as well as having a war). 
 
Speciation 
As I mentioned earlier, one of the big questions in Star Trek (and human  
evolutionary biology!) is whether Homo sapiens really could have  children 
with other humanoid groups. On Star Trek, we hear different stories  about how 
a half-human half-Vulcan child could be born — was it done in the  wild, or 
in the lab? But we are absolutely certain that Vulcans and Romulans are  
related so closely that they are able to have children with no problems. This  
actually mirrors issues in evolutionary science, too. 
When one species splits into two or more, that's called speciation. Usually 
 it happens when two groups of the same species are separated for long 
enough  that they evolve to the point where they are no longer able to produce  
offspring. The big question is, were groups like erectus and the 
Neanderthals  another species, or were they humans who just had facial and body 
structures  that were different from modern humans? There is now a lot of DNA 
evidence that  Homo sapiens interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans. So it's 
likely  that all three groups were, in fact, the same species. But we still 
know almost  nothing about Homo erectus, and are similarly in the dark when 
it comes  to the Hobbits and other hominin groups that are still being 
discovered. It's  possible that Homo sapiens interbred with Neanderthals, 
Vulcan/Romulan style,  but couldn't interbreed with Homo erectus. 
Speciation is a messy, uneven process that is rarely black or white.  
Sometimes two very different groups are basically like Vulcans and Romulans.  
They behave completely unlike each other but are genetically almost identical.  
Other groups may have a common ancestor, like humans and chimps, but they 
cannot  mate. It is suggested in Star Trek: Enterprise that humans and 
Vulcans  may be in this situation, if it's true that they require technological 
 
intervention to have viable offspring. 
We just don't know all the answers. In the case of Star Trek, that's due to 
 messy plotting and a lot of annoying retcons. In human evolution, it's 
because  we're still trying to discover enough about our history to understand 
what  happened while we evolved. 
 
_Full size_ (http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18bpqqzh06wv0jpg/original.jpg) 

We're All Human  
Many anthropologists use the word "human" or "people" to describe  
Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other hominins who were contemporary with modern  
humans. There's strong evidence that these groups used tools and fire, may have 
 
had language, and bore children with Homo sapiens. Similarly, in Star  
Trek, the humanoid aliens are always treated like people — even if they are  
Klingons who are killing everybody and eating piles of black gummi worms. They  
aren't called human, but they are clearly human-equivalent. Nobody uses the 
 pronoun "it" to describe a Romulan. They may be enemies, but they aren't  
animals. 
When we try to imagine what it would have been like for Homo sapiens  to 
migrate out of Africa, only to discover Neanderthals and Denisovans and  
possibly lots of other hominins, it isn't entirely unreasonable to keep Star  
Trek in mind. What was it like to live in a world with lots of other 
intelligent  hominins? Possibly something like being in a Federation with lots 
of 
other  humanoids.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to