While most of us won't agree with him about gay marriage, I think his overall 
prescription for the Republican party is on track.  Alas, I doubt anyone is 
listening...

http://tightwind.net/2013/02/draper-gop-fallen-behind/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tightwind+%28TightWind%29

The Party That History Forgot

Robert Draper has an excellent look at how the GOP has failed so badly since 
2004. He looks at both how behind the Republican party is technologically and 
the policy and brand issues that have turned the party into something of a 
joke. The whole piece is excellent and there are many parts worth discussing, 
but I wanted to highlight one in particular. This is from a focus group 
conducted by a GOP pollster:

The session with the young men was equally jarring. None of them expressed 
great enthusiasm for Obama. But their depiction of Republicans was even more 
lacerating than the women’s had been. “Racist,” “out of touch” and “hateful” 
made the list — “and put ‘1950s’ on there too!” one called out.

Showing a reverence for understatement, Anderson said: “A lot of those words 
you used to describe Republicans are negative. What could they say or do to 
make you feel more positive about the Republican Party?”

“Be more pro-science,” said a 22-year-old moderate named Jack. “Embrace 
technology and change.”

“Stick to your strong suit,” advised Nick, a 23-year-old African-American. 
“Clearly social issues aren’t your strong suit. Stop trying to fight the battle 
that’s already been fought and trying to bring back a movement. Get over it — 
you lost.”

I admit there’s a bit of schadenfreude here because I’ve been saying much of 
this since well before 2008, but people—especially younger people—have 
abandoned or written off the GOP because they don’t seem tied to the time 
period we’re in. They don’t appear to have any real ideas for solving the 
problems we have, like health care or concerns that the middle class is 
declining or that children will be worse off than their parents, let alone even 
seem to take these problems seriously. And that says nothing about waving off 
global warming as some kind of collective delusion and/or conspiracy of the 
left, evolution denial, utter stupidity on abortion and women’s health, and 
veiled race-baiting. The left derides the GOP as the party of wealthy white 
men, and the GOP does its best effort to provide evidence to support that.

There’s a clear path the party can take. First, take science (reality) 
seriously. Acknowledge global warming, acknowledge that evolution is real (and 
not phony trying-to-please-everyone stupidity like Marco Rubio’s answer to how 
old he thinks the earth is). Second, acknowledge that social conservatives lost 
the cultural battle on gay marriage (thank God), and that abortion is a 
contested issue in the country and while you can work to limit it, it must be 
rooted in truth (that science thing again), and it must be done with not just a 
focus on the unborn, but also toward maximizing the interests of all women, and 
with an actual understanding of what it’s like to face deciding whether to have 
an abortion and why. Third, take the deep (and real) fear people have that the 
middle class is on a downward path while the wealthy are ever-climbing 
seriously, because it is serious, and work toward actually improving the 
country’s situation rather than propose tax cuts as the solution to all ills 
like some snake oil cure-all. Fourth, mold this new party—socially moderate, 
fiscally-conservative—into one focused on allowing every person in this country 
to pursue and realize their dreams, free from government fiat and excess 
regulatory burden.

That fourth part is what the Republican party should be; not a party that’s 
dogmatically wedded to “small government” and tax cuts, but one that believes 
that while government has a role in our lives, it should lean toward solutions 
that don’t involve it at all or that when necessary, as much as possible, 
empower individuals and groups to accomplish a goal rather than centralized 
control.

That’s a potentially very strong philosophical driver for the Republican party, 
but getting there starts with parts one through three. And those will be 
difficult; those are entrenched beliefs within the Republican base and in 
leadership. So it will take—among many other things—all of us within the party 
standing up and pointing out when our leaders are wrong on these issues and 
when people in the party are wrong on them. As long as we allow xenophobia, 
homophobia and anti-science to fester within the party, the party will not have 
a future.


-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to