Once again, Americans only twelve years beyond 9/11 ask the same meaningless questions posed over and over by the media and a large part of our government apparatus that proclaims Islam as a peaceful religion, a symptom of continued American blind innocence and outright denial. Instead of asking "what radicalized them", the real question should be thankfully, what allows a segment of those who are born into Islam in much of Middle East, North Africa, Turkey and Central Asia, the Caucasus, Pakistan, India, West China, and Southeast Asia to avoid the appeal of the brutalizing ideology that proclaims hatred, violence, misogyny, anti-Semitism and the desire to eradicate all kaffirs.
N. Berdichevsky From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 1:40 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [RC] The mainstream media: Willful blindness to every unpleasant truth about Islam NRO April 20, 2013 4:00 AM <http://www.nationalreview.com/article/346145/jihad-will-not-be-wished-away> Jihad Will Not Be Wished Away But willful blindness remains the order of the day. By <http://www.nationalreview.com/author/900151> Andrew C. McCarthy Outlook: Islam." So reads the personal webpage of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who ravaged Boston this week, along with his now-deceased brother and fellow jihadist, Tamerlan - namesake of a 14th-century Muslim warrior whose campaigns through Asia Minor are legendary <http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/10/killing_from_quranic_piety_tam.html> for their brutalization of non-Muslims. Brutalizing our own non-Muslim country has been the principal objective of jihadists for the last 20 years. This week marks a new and chilling chapter: the introduction on our shores of the tactics the self-styled mujahideen have used to great, gory effect for the past decade in Afghanistan and Iraq. At a point in the race timed to achieve maximum carnage, the Tsarnaev brothers bombed the Boston Marathon with improvised explosive devices. IEDs are small but potent homemade bombs - crude explosives and unforgiving shrapnel encased in easily portable pressure cookers. The bombs are simple to make. They won't kill thousands or even hundreds of people like hijacked planes or heavy chemical explosives will. But that's not the objective. The goal is to instill terror into the flow of everyday life. IEDs are made for "soft" targets. They are easily camouflaged amid the traffic, the everyday debris, and the eight-year-old boys frolicking as they wait for Dad to cross the finish line. Willful blindness <http://www.encounterbooks.com/books/willful-blindness-a-memoir-of-the-jihad /?tab=overview> remains the order of the day, as it has since the World Trade Center was bombed in 1993. It is freely conceded that, when the identities and thus the motivation of the Marathon terrorists were not known, it would have been irresponsible to dismiss any radical ideology as, potentially, the instigator. But in our politically correct, up-is-down culture, to suggest "Outlook: Islam" was unthinkable. So the most likely scenario - namely, that jihadists who have been at war with us for two decades had, yet again, attacked innocent civilians - became the least likely scenario in the minds of media pundits. Instead, they brazenly prayed (to Gaia, I'm sure) for white conservative culprits with Tea Party hats and Rush 24/7 subscriptions. As our Kevin D. Williamson quipped <http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/346104/answer-liberals-prayers> , the "literal Caucasians" they got were not quite what they had in mind. To listen to the commentary was to assume that the jihad's nimble post-9/11 shift from heavy bombs and airliner missiles to IEDs had never happened. Prior to 2009, much agitprop was made over the thousands of American troops killed and maimed by IEDs in Iraq - they signified, the Left told us, that George Bush had brought al-Qaeda to previously jihad-free Baghdad. So did IEDs at the Marathon mean the same jihad had now come to Boston? Perish the thought. Surely the Marathon bombing was the work of either the right-wing extremists Janet Napolitano has been warning <http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/14/homeland-security-warns-rise-rig ht-wing-extremism/> us about since 2009, or those notoriously violent Catholics and Evangelicals that today's Army equates <http://frontpagemag.com/2013/robert-spencer/u-s-army-equates-catholicism-an d-evangelical-christianity-with-al-qaeda-and-hamas/> with Hamas and Hezbollah. But no: It was in fact the jihad that stubbornly refuses to be wished away. It will have to be defeated. It was never a molehill we were exaggerating into Mohammed's mountain. After 1,400 years of aggression, we can safely say it is not anytime soon going to evolve <http://pcr.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&id=5567> into the ballyhooed "internal struggle for personal betterment" - not for the tens of millions of Muslims for whom Islamic supremacism is, quite simply, Islam. So will we be roused to meet the challenge? Doesn't seem like it. On Friday morning, the damning and utterly predictable details began pouring in the second the jihadists were identified - "Outlook: Islam"; a YouTube playlist <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2311686/Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-Slain-bro ther-suspected-bombing-Bosto> called "Terrorists" that included the ditty, "I will dedicate my life to jihad"; a wife who abruptly converted to Islam and began dressing in what a neighbor called "the Islamic style"; an apparent reverence for the notorious <http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/459253/20130419/feiz-mohammad-tamerlan-ts arnaev-boston-marathon.htm> sharia jurist Sheikh Feiz Mohammed. Yet the media commentary, even if it grudgingly mentions these things, internalizes none of them. "How shocking it is," we've repeatedly heard, "that the brothers Tsarnaev want to mass-murder Americans. After all, they're Chechen Muslims, and the Chechens' beef is with the Russians, not us." Good grief. It is the Uighurs all over again. You'll recall the Uighurs - they were a group of Turkic-speaking jihadists from the Xinjiang region of China, detained at Guantanamo Bay because they trained in Afghanistan with an al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorist organization (the East Turkistan Islamic Movement). At least some of them fought against American forces. Nevertheless, we released them. Stroking its bloated chin, our government rationalized that they could not be enemy combatants because they weren't our enemies - their beef was really with China, right? After all, Islam is a Religion of Peace and we're very nice people, so why should we assume they might have a problem with us? -- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
