Interesting article Billy.

 

Mental illness adds incalculable costs to our society financially and 
emotionally.  Indeed, it would be great to figure out on a deeper level the 
causes of mental illness.  Many of the serious life disrupting/life ruining 
Axis II (DSM-V) personality disorders are not helped in any comprehensive way 
by medicines, and many Axis I disorders (bipolar, clinical depression, 
schizophrenia, etc.) are helped significantly by meds, but the side effects are 
dreadful.

 

Being able to come up with better medicines and non-medicine therapies would be 
enormously helpful to our society.

 

 

Chris

 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 1:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [RC] Psychiatry on the verge of major changes

 

 

 

 

 

New Scientist

 


Psychiatry needs its Higgs boson moment 


*       29 April 2013 by  
<http://www.newscientist.com/search?rbauthors=Nick+Craddock> Nick Craddock 

Fighting the scourge of mental illness means giving psychiatry the kind of 
boost that physics got from the Higgs hunt

PSYCHIATRISTS and other mental health practitioners are nothing if not 
pragmatic, using the best available evidence to guide diagnoses and treatments. 
But not since Freud's pseudoscientific theories early last century has 
psychiatry claimed any broad theoretical basis for making sense of our normal 
and abnormal feelings, thinking and social behaviours – the complexities at the 
heart of being human.

In fact, the international classifications used to diagnose mental disorders 
are descriptive and explicitly "atheoretical" – to acknowledge our limited 
understanding and the need for empirical evidence rather than fanciful theory.

While this is a necessary stage in the development of a complex field and 
intellectually attractive to some, there is a need to create a coherent 
scientific narrative and a more theoretical foundation for psychiatry. This may 
seem like a challenge too far for many, and it has undoubtedly been an 
impediment to recruiting enough of the best minds.

That matters for everyone. Mental ill health accounts for some 15 per cent of 
the disease burden in developed countries – and people who are seriously 
mentally ill typically die 20 years earlier than would otherwise be expected. 
Globally, by 2020, the WHO expects depression to come second only to heart 
disease as a cause of lost years of health. For that to improve, psychiatry 
must be able to recruit the very best.

Recently, some colleagues and I launched a report, Strengthening Academic 
Psychiatry in the UK, and found ourselves justifying how psychiatry had 
acquired – and was still struggling to shrug off – the label of a "vulnerable 
academic discipline". There were particular concerns about a fall in academic 
recruitment and unfilled academic posts.

Compare this with a field like physics. At just one frontier, it has a standard 
model that describes particles, Higgs field theory, the search for the Higgs 
boson and the Large Hadron Collider. These constitute a clear narrative: there 
is a global collaborative search for a "missing" particle based on fundamental 
theory, using a large and expensive piece of equipment that allows experimental 
testing of this and other predictions. This heady mix understandably makes 
physics a popular career choice.

Psychiatry, on the other hand, started the new millennium a few hundred years 
behind physics. But the decade that followed saw radical change, and set the 
stage for an intense period of catch-up. It is not fanciful to describe what 
will happen as the equivalent of some 200 to 300 years of progress being 
compressed into 20 to 30 years. This corresponds to the period of greatest 
productivity in a scientist or clinician's career, so someone starting research 
now stands to make great headway.

If such a speedy catch-up seems like an extravagant claim, consider that the 
scientific kit and culture of "big science" are now sufficiently developed to 
deliver unprecedented insights into the neuroscience of mental illness. Key 
tools include molecular genetics, neuro-imaging and artificial intelligence.

We are already seeing research into the neuroscience of decision-making and 
social behaviours such as neuro-economics, which models choice behaviour 
mathematically. And enormous advances are being made in understanding the 
molecular genetics of major disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder 
and depression.

For centuries, we have known that susceptibility to psychiatric illness can be 
inherited. In the past five years, studies of tens of thousands of people are 
beginning to pin down some of the genes and biochemical pathways involved.

Take voltage-gated calcium channels. They were initially implicated in bipolar 
disorder in 2008, but have subsequently been linked to other psychiatric 
disorders. This was not a pathway that researchers had considered. It is, 
however, well understood when it comes to heart disorders.

That fact immediately opens up new ways of using existing knowledge and drugs. 
Crucially, too, this kind of exciting research may help us understand why we 
quite often see people who are both mentally and physically ill. In the calcium 
channel example, it may help explain why we often see patients with both heart 
disease and mood disorders.

Another tantalising finding is the involvement of the major histocompatibility 
complex – a key part of the immune system – in influencing how susceptible 
people are to mental illness. Together with research into other immune-related 
genes in diseases such as Alzheimer's, the idea that immune processes are 
involved in some psychiatric phenotypes is looking ever more solid.

Powerful advances are also being made in using computer networks to model 
neuron biology and to build complex neuronal networks, which should produce 
interesting emergent properties. The European Union's €1.1 billion Human Brain 
Project, for example, aims to understand the brain as a single system, 
integrating multiple levels of organisation – surely a key step towards 
preventing or curing psychiatric diseases.

One of the biggest challenges will be to unite these disparate methodologies to 
tease apart the normal and abnormal working of the brain in schizophrenia, 
bipolar disorder, depression, and the like, diseases that devastate the lives 
of so many and are so often associated with early death.

So, in 2013, psychiatry has powerful scientific tools and a developing 
narrative that already points to strong theoretical bases. Yet, in the UK 
research into mental illness has stalled at around 5 per cent of the annual 
medical research budget, and the picture is similar in other rich countries. 
That will have to change – and governments and funders are starting to see 
this. The door is open: all that is needed is for more of the best to come in 
and find out just how hot psychiatry really is.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
 
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to