Modern American Atheism Is Reaction to Christian Right, Sociologists  Argue
 


 
 
 
 





By _Napp Nazworth_ (http://www.christianpost.com/author/napp-nazworth/)   , 
Christian Post Reporter
April 29, 2013
Atheism changes over time and is a reaction to the  dominant religious 
beliefs of the time. Today's atheism is, in part, a reaction  to the political 
activism of conservative Christians, or the "Christian Right."  This is one 
of the conclusions found in a new study of American atheists, _There is No 
God: Atheists in America_ (https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781442218512) , by  
University of North Texas sociologists David A. Williamson and George Yancey  .
For their research, Williamson, associate professor of sociology, and 
Yancey,  professor of sociology, used an online survey, with open-ended 
questions, of  1,451 atheists and conducted face-to-face interviews with 51 
atheists 
from two  separate regions of the country. 
In an interview with The Christian Post, Yancey spoke about what motivated  
him to write the book, why he thinks it is important to study atheists, and 
 whether atheists have a moral system. 
The following is an edited transcript of that interview: 
CP: First, let us talk about who you are studying. You're not  studying 
those who are simply hostile or indifferent to religion. You're not  studying 
those who simply, when asked if there is a God answer "no." You're only  
studying those who identify themselves as an atheist. Why study only  
self-identified atheists? 
Yancey: We talk about the growing "none" population and say, those are 
people  who don't believe in God, whereas, there's a lot a reasons why people 
answer  "none of the above" when it comes to religion. There still is a degree 
of stigma  to being an atheist. It has gone down less, but it's still 
there. And so,  someone who says, "I am an atheist," they are really making a 
declaration of  their beliefs. Not that they just passively don't believe in 
God. They clearly  have an identity, to some degree, in their atheism. So we 
were curious about  some of the things we saw in some of our other research 
on individuals who  identify themselves as atheists. 
We think that, in some ways, atheists may be a leading edge of that "none"  
group, although there is no guarantee that is the case. Nonetheless, they 
are a  very important part of that "none" group. 
One of the things that really jumped out at us when we studied progressive  
activists (of course our sample is not random so we're not saying that is 
true  across the country), we found that 61 percent of our respondents 
self-identified  as atheists, compared to anywhere from one to four percent of 
the 
country who  claim to be atheists. I do think that atheists have something 
unique to say. I  think they're a very important part of that "none" 
subgroup and their influence  says something. 
What also caught our attention was the literature of the new atheists –  
[Christopher] Hitchens, [Sam] Harris, [Richard] Dawkins. That's been very  
influential. If nothing else, it has galvanized a certain culture that I 
thought  was worth doing some research in. 
CP: You find that atheists are mostly highly educated, wealthy, old,  
white, men, and that was consistent with some random samples as  well. 
Yancey: Yeah. The only thing that might not be as consistent is a couple of 
 studies suggest that atheists may not be quite as wealthy as some other 
studies  did. But the other things, they tend to be men, educated, older. 
Although, there  is some indication of some younger atheists coming up. 
CP: So demographically, they look, more or less, like the U.S.  Senate. 
Yancey: [Laughs] I hadn't thought about it that way, but, yeah, that's a 
good  way of looking at it. 
CP: You're basically talking about a privileged group – wealthy, old,  
white guys. You say it makes sense that atheists would come from a privileged  
group. Explain. 
Yancey: If you are a person with social status and power, and you want to 
do  things the way you see it, and then there's religion out there that says, 
no,  this is the way it should be done, that's going to make you less 
willing to  support or accept that sort of religion. Something we write about 
in 
the book is  this notion of control. If you have social status and others 
who don't tend to  see things the way you do because they have religion and 
follow that, then it  will tend to make you more antagonistic toward religion 
than you would normally  be. 
CP: You point out that, like religion, atheism changes over time and  
modern atheism is a response to modern events, such as the Christian Right  
political movement. How has the Christian Right shaped atheism? 
Yancey: Historically, atheism reacts against the religion of its day. Even  
though not all Christians are part of the Christian Right, they tend to be 
the  most vocal Christians in this day and age. 
This probably contributes to why atheists tend to be more politically  
progressive. They are reacting against the vision of Christians as being  
conservative politically. Given what we know about history, atheists are going  
to 
tend to be the opposite. In that way, the Christian Right has helped shape  
atheists. 
CP: You compared atheists from the South with atheists from the  Midwest 
and found that those from the South were less fearful and more tolerant  of 
the Christian Right. 
Yancey: A little bit. 
CP: Why the difference between atheists in the South and atheists in  the 
Midwest? 
Yancey: I think it probably comes down to contact. When you have contact 
with  people, maybe you disagree with them, maybe you don't like what they 
have to  say, but you tend to humanize them a little more. 
Most of the people we interviewed grew up in households that were, if not  
atheists, were nominally religious. They didn't grow up around a lot of 
people  who were highly religious, with some exceptions. Those in the South are 
around  religion all the time, so they may be atheists but they're a little 
less  hostile. 
CP: There are some libertarian atheists who follow the philosophy of  Ayn 
Rand. From your chapter on the political views of atheists, I take it you  
didn't find many of them. 
Yancey: We didn't ask specifically about that, so I can't say for sure we  
didn't interview any libertarian atheists, but nearly all the atheists we  
interviewed, when we talked about politics it wasn't merely on the cultural  
issues, they were progressive when it came to issues of the environment,  
government, taxes, that sort of stuff. 
I have no doubt that those libertarian atheists are out there, maybe our  
sample design didn't allow us to capture them. Maybe they aren't connected to 
 the organizations I was working with. 
My suspicion is, because atheism is a reaction to the Christian Right,  
they're going to be smaller in numbers. There are times in history when  
Christianity was quite progressive when it came to economic issues – the whole  
notion of social justice and things of this nature. It seems to me that you  
would have more libertarian atheists at times like that. 
CP: Besides reacting to the Christian Right, are there any other  reasons 
you found that atheists are more comfortable on the left side of the  
political spectrum? 
Yancey: That's an interesting question. We didn't ask them whether they 
were  first atheist then became progressive or were first progressive then 
became  atheists. So I'm not sure the directionality of it. I think it's a 
question that  needs further study. 
CP: You found that a lot of atheists believe that religious adherents  
should not proselytize. Do they proselytize? In other words, do they think it 
is 
 important to convince others of atheism? 
Yancey: Yes and no. They don't proselytize in the way that Christians tend 
to  proselytize. Atheists tend to believe that people are religious because 
they are  socialized to be that way. Therefore, while atheists aren't going 
door to door  to convince people of atheism, they do talk about making sure 
that our school  systems socialize kids correctly and that kids are 
socialized so that they will  learn the facts in the way that atheists tend to 
see 
the facts. They enunciate a  perspective that, if that happens, you're going 
to see a lot less religion. 
A lot of atheists do believe that religion will decrease over time because  
people are going to be given the truth in the way that they are educated 
and  socialized. So that is how atheists see a spread of an anti-theist or 
non-theist  perspective is through institutions rather than a one-on-one 
"witnessing," as  Christians would call it. 
CP: You found that atheists often expressed that they strongly value  
open-mindedness, yet they were not very open-minded to the notion that they  
could be wrong about the existence of God. Were they aware of this 
contradiction 
 or oblivious to it? 
Yancey: We didn't really probe that. I think it's fascinating and maybe we  
should've probed that. 
It doesn't make atheists different from other individuals. A lot of us have 
 contradictions. We say one thing and five minutes later we're saying 
something  totally different. 
My suspicion is that they don't see it as a contradiction. In their minds,  
there is so much evidence that there is not a God that that is just the way 
it  is. 
CP: Some critics of atheism argue that atheists are immoral or have a  weak 
sense of morality. What did you find? 
Yancey: Atheists have a different sense of morality than a traditional  
Christian. But whenever you talk about what people ought to do, then you are  
enunciating morality. 
Atheists believe that people should be rational, that people should do  
critical thinking, that people should keep religion out of politics. This is a  
different set of moralities than how Christians may see it, but it is a 
moral  system. We do talk about an atheist morality. 
I think, because they tend to be progressives, they see certain 
conservative  political philosophies as immoral as well, as irrational or as 
intrusive, 
things  of this nature. So we would argue it is not accurate to say that 
atheists are  immoral. If you want to say they are not moral by a traditional 
system, that's  fine. But, to say they are immoral implies that they don't 
have declarations of  what is right and wrong and clearly, they  do.



-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to