Billy,

 

I like your term moral-renaissance better than post-moral.  Our society’s mores 
have clearly changed from the societal construct of the WWII era, but in many 
ways one could argue that things are now more moral.

 

Women have been liberated from arguably amoral practices that kept them from 
achieving parity in the workplace, racial equality is much closer to being 
achieved than it was when the Tuskegee Airmen had to fight in a separate 
division.  On the flip side, the hideous sex and violence that pervades popular 
media and video games clearly appear to me as post-moral.

 

What should be the form of a moral renaissance?  That is an incredibly good 
question.  One answer that is easy to say but very hard to accomplish is to 
strengthen families.  Married or not, the commitment to co-parenting children 
as a close and intact team seems to have eroded.  If we can raise healthy 
children who have not suffered from undue childhood trauma, we will be building 
a stronger base for our society.  Fair and moral children will emerge from 
families that support these strong moral values.

 

Chris

 

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 2:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [RC] The Post-moral society

 

 

 

The Post-moral society 

 

 

There are a number of implications that follow from the facts reported in 

the article cited below. And there are questions to ask.

 

Granted, the 1960s saw the start of what may be called "post-moral society,"

but while there is correlation how does this say there was causation ?

And even if we grant all of the particular "causes" for parts of the switch

from a moral society to a post-moral culture :

 

(1)  Was there a meta-narrative force also at work and which drove

the whole process far more than  any individual elements of it ?

To me it is obvious that there was, and still is, even if, so far,

there is no easy way to identify this force-for-evil convincingly.

 

(2)  What is the remedy ?  A call to "return to God," as good as the

motivation for such a view may be,  doesn't address the problem since

it leaves out causality, as if the cure for illness was a call to good health.

Sure, we want to be healthy, but if we don't understand how to get there

we cannot get there.

 

(3)  If we grant that parts of the moral system as it existed prior to the late 
1960s

was dysfunctional, which seems to be a self-evident truth, just where do we

draw the line ?

 

(4)  What are the best, most valid, true, etc, sources for necessary morality

for the 21st century.  Just saying "the Bible" hardly cuts it. Who's 
interpretation

of the Bible ?  Does this exclude the Buddhist sutras or other sacred texts ?

To what extent should we factor in various errors within the Bible as relevant

to moral questions ?  What secular sources ought to be considered ?

What is the legitimate role for psychology, anthropology, neurology,

philosophy, game theory, sociobiology, and so forth ?

 

(5)  If we agree that there needs to be a "moral renaissance" exactly

what form should this take ?

 

For your consideration

Billy

 

 

==========================================

 

 

 

from the site:

Freemason Information


HOW DID OUR MORAL VALUES CHANGE?


June 5, 2013 by TimBryce <http://www.freemasoninformation.com/author/timbryce/> 
   



BRYCE ON MORALITY

- Was there an epoch event that caused us to change? Actually, Yes, I believe 
so.

 

Following the publication of my book,  
<http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/morality1.htm> “Stand Up for MORALITY,” I was 
asked by a reader why there is a disparity between the moral values of 
yesteryear and today. Was there an event that caused it? I can only offer a 
theory as to the cause, but first let’s consider some fundamental differences 
between then and now: 

* Many years ago, declaring bankruptcy <http://www.debt.org/bankruptcy/>  was 
considered a disgrace, now it is commonplace and a convenient way to avoid 
paying your bills. Over the last 100 years, bankruptcy in the United States has 
slowly climbed. It began to accelerate in 1980, when there were less than 500K 
filings, and skyrocketed to its height of +2M in 2005. True, bankruptcy will 
affect your credit and future ability to use money, but it has become the 
escape hatch of choice for people inundated with loans or bills. Declaring 
bankruptcy may get you out of the hole, but it certainly will not help your 
creditors.

* Divorce was considered scandalous for many years. Attitudes change though and 
the 1970′s marked the decade where the divorce rate 
<http://www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/socy441/trends/divorce.html>  began to 
skyrocket.

* Pregnancies out of wedlock 
<http://firstthings.org/out-of-wedlock-pregnancy-fact-sheet>  were also 
considered a family disgrace. Since the 1960′s though, it has steadily 
increased. For example, in 1980 18.4% of all births in the United States were 
to unmarried women; in 2007 the rate was nearly 40%.

* Premarital sex <http://www.pbs.org/fmc/book/4family2.htm> , which was long 
considered a taboo, accelerated dramatically in the 1960′s, from 22% to 74% in 
1991.

* Being unemployed was considered a black mark against a person, particularly 
if you were fired. Not so anymore, primarily due to the financial instability 
of our economy.

* It used to be, the very idea of accepting charity from anyone was considered 
an embarrassment. Not so anymore. Today, over 100 million people accept 
federally funded welfare 
<http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/over-100-million-now-receiving-federal-welfare_649589.html>
 .

* Female-headed households 
<http://www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/socy441/trends/femhh.html>  has grown 
considerably since 1960 at about 8% of households to 23% by 2000.

* Whereas attending church 
<http://www.churchsociety.org/issues_new/church/stats/iss_church_stats_attendance.asp>
  was considered a natural part of life years ago, attendance has steadily 
declined since the 1960′s.

So, what caused these changes? My theory is it was the cultural revolution of 
the 1960′s where attitudes and values began to change. This is the decade where 
young Americans protested the Viet Nam war as opposed to supporting the 
military as their parents did in World War II. It was also the decade of civil 
rights, of protesting how we were treating the environment, of burning and 
looting downtowns, and where Yippie power turned the 1968 Democratic convention 
upside-down. Places like Chicago, Watts, Newark, and Selma became icons of 
disturbance in our country. And it was a decade marred by political 
assassinations triggered by social change.

The 1960′s was also a decade where a counterculture of drugs emerged; where 
people like Timothy Leary encouraged young people to “turn on, tune in, drop 
out,” and people like Dr. Benjamin Spock encouraged parents to give their 
children more freedom and independence as opposed to discipline and teamwork. 
It was a decade where our music changed, and the words accompanying it 
reflected the mood of the young people, of protest and change. Thanks to the 
space race of the 1960′s, our technology changed in leaps and bounds, and the 
electronic media became a dominating influence in our society. And it was a 
decade where lawyers dismantled old customs in our culture, such as the 
classroom, and people began to question if God really existed.

Because of the 1960′s, all of the attitudes and values of our parents were 
challenged and a new libertine era of permissiveness was born. We lost respect 
for our government, our institutions such as schools and churches, and the 
concept of conformity. It was an era where we tried to “beat the system” and 
reinvent America. We revolted with youthful exuberance, but interestingly, most 
of us didn’t know it at the time.

I can think of no other reason for such dramatic changes in moral values than 
the 1960′s. It was fascinating to live through, but we had no idea of the 
sweeping changes it would have on the personality of the country.

Keep the Faith!

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
 
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to