Hi Billy, Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 14, 2013, at 18:37, [email protected] wrote: > What MUST be kept in mind is the fact that all of this is conceived by > Wikipedia's editors as unbiased, truthful, objective, and so forth. As you yourself actually are? :-) Yes, Wikipedia has problems. But most of those are cultural. If you has taken the time to learn and work with them, rather than against them, you could have had a very different outcome. Yes, it is a "fail" that Wikipedia is often impenetrable to outsiders. But the real reason is that they are "conservative" in the broad sense -- they resist radical change. And that conservatism is largely why they have scaled insanely well on a shoestring budget. I told you several times how you could have done things differently and gotten most of what you wanted. The fact that you ended up frustrated is as much your fail as theirs. :-( E -- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
