|
OK then, how would you make it more
coherent? You probably don't need to win over every Huffington
Post reporter, but his readers might be another story. The readers
would only get the "incoherent" version unless you correct it.
David "There is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no virtue in advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and "sensitive" because he wants to expand the government's charitable programs is merely saying that he's willing to try to do good with other people's money. Well, who isn't? And a voter who takes pride in supporting such programs is telling us that he'll do good with his own money -- if a gun is held to his head."--P. J. O'Rourke On 6/15/2013 4:20 AM, [email protected] wrote:
-- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. |
Title: ORourke54.htm
- [RC] [ RC ] The Huffington Post's incoherent view of Rad... BILROJ
- Re: [RC] The Huffington Post's incoherent view of Rad... David R. Block
