Atlas Shrugs
June 28, 2013
 
 
With friends like these ......
 
 
With friends like Melanie Phillips, who needs enemies? Articulate and  
useless. 
Melanie Phillips writes in her latest column, entitled _The  British 
government's jihad against free thought_ 
(http://www.melaniephillips.com/the-british-governments-jihad-against-free-thought)
 , "I do not support the  approach 
taken by either Geller or Spencer to the problem  of Islamic extremism. 
Both have endorsed groups such as the EDL and others which  at best do not deal 
with the thuggish elements in their ranks and at worst are  truly racist or 
xenophobic." 
What "other groups" is she talking about? Who would Phillips have fight 
this  war? What does she suggest? And what is the elitist contempt for the EDL? 
_I was there_ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/05/pamela-geller-edl-in-the-american-thinker-.html)
  when they were formed as a 
result of _vicious epithets and abuse being hurled at returning soldiers_ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/03/uk-muslims-hurl-abuse-at-
returning-british-soldier-parade.html)   by devout Muslims. The rise of the 
EDL was a natural response, an organic  repulsion to a hatred, to a violent 
movement bent on the destruction of our way  of life. 
I have monitored the group for the past four years. Are they perfect? Of  
course not, and I have expressed concerns in the past (_here_ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/06/tommy-robinson-any-rogue-elements-w
ithin-the-edl-that-go-against-our-mission-statement-will-be-remov.html)   
and _here_ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/06/edl-shake-up.html) ),  
and they do their best _to purge their ranks _ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/06/tommy-robinson-any-rogue-elements-w
ithin-the-edl-that-go-against-our-mission-statement-will-be-remov.html) of 
problems, but their heart is in the  right place. I understand there is a 
class system still in Britain and these  blokes are a bit rough round the 
edges and less than cultured, but so what? Who  does Phillips think is going to 
fight this war? Dandies? 
What's her answer, then? Seriously. The EDL is thuggish? I see. That reeks  
of elitism. These boys are a bit dirty and they don't do high tea at 4. But 
I  know they have no racist agenda, and far from being neo-Nazis, they're 
one of  the most (if not the most) pro-Israel groups in Britain. They've 
reached out to  Jews, Sikhs, women, gays and others. They oppose violence and 
do 
not provoke it;  they just fight back when attacked. Phillips ought to back 
up her taint with  fact. I can't see past her argument. I want proof, 
Melanie. I have seen what  they done to me. And Spencer. And every other 
effective counter jihadist. The  lies, the libel. I want proof, Melanie. We 
live in 
a day and age where video,  iphones, etc. make documenting such accusations 
easy. Why not them?
Phillips goes on to posit that the result of our sanction of the EDL "has  
been a serious blow to the credibility of these two writers, with particular 
 damage being done to Spencer whose scholarship in itself is scrupulous. It 
has  also split the defence against Islamic extremism, and handed a potent 
propaganda  weapon to those who seek falsely to portray as bigoted 
extremists all who are  engaged in the defence of the west against the Islamic 
jihad." 
I don't know what planet Phillips is on, but they have been calling any and 
 all of us bigoted extremists long before the EDL came into being. That was 
 always the strategy of the smear machine. CAIR et al haven't changed their 
 tactics; the only difference now is that through money, media and men they 
have  recruited many to their ....... jihad.  
As for "splitting the defense against Islamic extremism" --  she harkens  
back to an era that exists only in her mind. Phillips has fashioned a 
fictional  construct unrelated to reality. Where did the polite talk get the 
hundreds of  non-Muslim tween girls gang-raped and sex trafficked by scores of 
Muslim gangs  in the past decade? Law enforcement ignored their pleas for years 
before the EDL  existed, because they didn't want to offend the "Asian" 
community.  
This kind of circular firing squad is the fatal weakness of the right. They 
 accept and adopt the smears that our adversaries manufacture to destroy 
the most  effective activists.  
As for the ban, _sign this petition._ 
(http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/allow-pamela-geller-and-robert-spencer-to-speak-in-uk/sign.html)
  
_The  British government's jihad against free thought_ 
(http://www.melaniephillips.com/the-british-governments-jihad-against-free-thought)
  Melanie 
Phillips  


By banning from the country as extremists the American anti-jihadis Robert  
Spencer and Pamela Geller, the Home Secretary Teresa May has not only made  
herself look ridiculous but has sent the enemies of the United Kingdom the  
message that they have it on the run. 
I do not support the approach taken by either Geller or Spencer to the  
problem of Islamic extremism. Both have endorsed groups such as the EDL and  
others which at best do not deal with the thuggish elements in their ranks and 
 at worst are truly racist or xenophobic. 
The result has been a serious blow to the credibility of these two writers, 
 with particular damage being done to Spencer whose scholarship in itself 
is  scrupulous. It has also split the defence against Islamic extremism, and  
handed a potent propaganda weapon to those who seek falsely to portray as  
bigoted extremists all who are engaged in the defence of the west against 
the  Islamic jihad. 
Nevertheless, the decision to ban this duo from Britain is unjustified,  
oppressive and comes perilously close to lining up the British government  
alongside those who wish to silence defenders of the west against the jihad,  
making a total mockery of Britain’s understanding of just who presents a  
danger to the state. 
Neither Geller nor Spencer remotely presents such a danger. They intended  
to come to Britain to join an EDL rally in Woolwich, in the wake of the  
barbaric murder there of Drummer Lee Rigby by two Islamists last month. 
Personally, I believe the EDL is not a respectable platform to join.  
Whether or not its rally is itself a threat to public order is, however,  
another 
issue. As far as is known, it is not being banned. It is only Geller  and 
Spencer who have been banned from the country on the grounds that their  
presence is ‘not conducive to the public good’. The implication is that they  
will incite violence or disorder. But all the two of them do is criticise  
Islam, condemn jihadis and warn against the west’s failure to take seriously  
their machinations. 

 
One may think they go too far, that some of their views are unpleasant or  
offensive or wrong; but that is surely no reason to ban them from the 
country.  What on earth have we come to, after all, when the British Home 
Secretary is  banning people on the basis that they criticise Islam and warn 
against 
jihadi  violence? Is this not exactly the menacing argument mounted by 
Islamic  extremists, that any condemnation of Islamic extremism is to be banned 
as  ‘Islamophobic’? 
Moreover, from the text of the _Home  Secretary’s letter_ 
(http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/06/britain-capitulates-to-jihad.html)  to 
Spencer, it would 
appear that the reason for the  ban is that the British government is now 
telling people that certain  interpretations of Islam are to be proscribed, 
even if they may be true  – a truly terrifying and totalitarian development, 
and an open assault upon  freedom of thought and expression, not to mention 
religious scholarship. 
And if the argument is that any criticism of Islam may incite violence  
against Muslims, then by the same token Mrs May should ban all criticism of  
Israel -- on the much firmer grounds that there is a clearly demonstrated  
correlation between hate campaigns against Israel and attacks on Jews and 
Jewish  institutions. Of course, that would be unthinkable.  So why the double  
standard? 
And that is what is particularly intolerable here -- that Mrs May is 
allowing  people to run around Britain who really are stirring up hatred and 
worse, but who appear to be untouchable because they are Islamists. _The  
Commentator _ 
(http://www.thecommentator.com/article/3866/theresa_may_s_ban_on_robert_spencer_and_pamela_geller_reveals_a_troubling_relativism)
 has drawn 
attention to  the recent entry to Britain of  Muhammad Al-Arifi, a Saudi 
scholar 
who has declared that Shia Muslims are  ‘evil’ and also _stated_ 
(http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2013/02/08/265035.html)    that ‘...al-Qaeda 
leader 
Sheikh Oussama Bin Laden, may his soul rest  in peace, did not adopt many 
of the thoughts that are attributed to him  today’. 
The government also allowed into the country Shady Al-Suleiman, the  
Australian cleric who has called ‘for Allah to destroy the enemies of Islam’,  
who has endorsed Hamas which Britain recognises as a terrorist entity, and 
even  endorsed the killing of British soldiers, saying, ‘Give victory to all 
the  Mujahideen all over the world. Oh Allah, prepare us for the jihad’. 
Aren’t these men, who foment sectarian division and endorse  terrorism, not 
‘conducive to the public good’? 
So why did Mrs May ban Spencer and Geller? Was it because of the _petition 
_ (http://action.hopenothate.org.uk/page/s/refuse-them-a-visa) to do so by 
Hope not Hate -- which misrepresented and smeared them by  claiming they 
called all Muslims savages (they did not)? Was it in response to  one of the 
signatories to this petition, Tony Lloyd, Greater Manchester’s Police  and 
Crime Commissioner (who Spencer and Geller say also misrepresented what they  
have said) who termed them 
‘hate preachers – every bit as bad as those who  use the name of Islam to 
propagate hatred’? 
What an extraordinary thing to say. Geller and Spencer don’t go round 
calling  for people to be killed, or preaching genocide or holy war, or 
spreading 
 conspiracy theories and lies to foment hysteria and hatred. But when he 
was  chairman of the Parliamentary Labour Party, Tony Lloyd led a delegation 
to Gaza  to meet leaders of Hamas, where he was photographed fraternally 
shaking the hand  of the Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh. 
So Lloyd is happy to meet with a group whose leader has _called  Israel_ 
(http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/01/01/Haniyeh-Israel-cancerous)  a ‘
cancerous tumour that must be removed’ and whose officials _have  said_ 
(http://archive.adl.org/main_israel/hamas_own_words.htm)   
‘the Jews are the most despicable and contemptible  nation to crawl upon 
the face of the earth, because they have displayed  hostility to Allah…Allah 
will kill the Jews in the hell of the world to come,  just like they killed 
the believers in the hell of this world’ 
and  
‘...the Jewish faith does not wish for peace nor  stability, since it is a 
faith that is based on murder: “I kill, therefore I  am”... Israel is based 
only on blood and murder in order to exist, and it will  disappear, with 
Allah's will, through blood and shahids [martyrs]’  
– and yet he called for Spencer and Geller to be banned as ‘hate preachers’
,  a demand which the Home Secretary agrees was justified even as she 
allows real  hate preachers to spread their poison around Britain. 
Has Britain now totally lost the plot? 
UPDATE: _Robert  Spencer has it here:_ 
(http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/06/melanie-phillips-sends-the-enemies-of-the-united-kingdom-the-message-that-they
-have-it-on-the-run.html)  
Note in the first place that the letter from the Home Office barring me  
from the UK said nothing at all about the EDL or "others." (What others?) It  
quoted a statement of mine that Islam has a doctrine mandating warfare 
against  unbelievers -- a statement that is demonstrably true. So Melanie 
Phillips'  bringing up the EDL here is completely gratuitous, designed to 
distinguish her  work from ours, and to show the British elites that she is not 
tainted with  our taint. In fact, the EDL has nothing racist or xenophobic 
about 
its  platform, and removes such individuals from its ranks when they're 
found. It  is only "thuggish" in that its members fight back when attacked by 
Islamic  supremacists. Melanie Phillips thinks that the EDL is racist and 
xenophobic  because she has seen a thousand media reports insisting that it is. 
As someone  who has been lied about in the same mainstream media, she ought 
to be a bit  more skeptical of what they report. The people who claim that 
the EDL are  racist and xenophobic are primarily the foes of the 
counter-jihad movement in  general. I've seen how they lie about me; why should 
I 
believe them about the  EDL? Melanie Phillips has seen how they lie about her; 
why 
should she  believe them about the EDL? 
Her fastidious distinguishing of herself from those among the foes of jihad 
 and Islamic supremacism to which she objects will not win her a pass. 
Every  last foe of jihad gets the same treatment. Phillips' fundamental error 
is 
to  think that if she distances herself from the EDL (and those shadowy 
"others"),  Pamela Geller, and me, that the Leftists and Islamic supremacists 
won't direct  their fury on her, and subject her to the same campaign of 
smears and  defamation to which they have subjected us. But they will. There 
are 
plenty of  foes of "Islamic extremism" who think that if they utter 
nonsense about  "moderate Islam" and "hijacking of religion," that they will 
outflank the  politically correct narrative. They don't realize that the 
purveyors 
of  political correctness really are fascist authoritarians -- that is not 
just  Spencer's rhetorical flourish. They will give Melanie Phillips no 
quarter, no  matter how much she concedes to them. And the more she does 
concede 
to them,  the more she plays their game, the more she allows them to set 
the terms of  the debate and define the parameters of the narrative, the more 
she empowers  them, and sends the enemies of the United Kingdom the message 
that they have  it on the run. That's the fundamental problem with her 
friendly fire. 
The result has been a serious blow to the  credibility of these two 
writers, with particular  damage being done to Spencer whose scholarship in  
itself 
is scrupulous. It has also split the     defence  against Islamic 
extremism, and handed a potent propaganda weapon to those who  seek falsely to 
portray as bigoted extremists all who  are engaged in the defence of the west   
  
against the  Islamic jihad. 
If anyone has "split the defence against Islamic extremism," it is those  
such as Melanie Phillips and The Commentator who are careful to attack foes 
of  "Islamic extremism" even while defending them. And the rest of this is  
outstandingly naive: the foes of freedom were portraying "all who are engaged 
 in the defence of the west against the Islamic jihad" as "bigoted 
extremists"  long before the EDL existed. What she doesn't seem to understand 
is the 
game  the Left and Islamic supremacists play: they pick a target, defame 
it, smear  it, and demonize it, until finally it is completely marginalized. 
They demand  that freedom fighters denounce and distance themselves from the 
targeted  individual. Melanie Phillips is playing along with this game with 
alacrity.  But no one of any position except their own will ultimately be 
acceptable  them. They will just move on from the EDL to the next target, and 
demonize it  as well, until the remaining foes of jihad denounce and 
distance themselves  from the new target as well. Then they will pick another 
foe 
of jihad and do  the same thing, until there is no one left. The worst thing 
foes of jihad  could do in the face of this game is play it, and allow some 
individual or  group to be destroyed on the basis of unsubstantiated claims 
and Leftist  propaganda. But Melanie Phillips just keeps playing along.  
Nevertheless, the decision to ban this duo from Britain is  unjustified, 
oppressive and comes perilously close to lining up the British  government 
alongside those who wish to silence defenders of the west against  the jihad, 
making a total mockery of Britain’s understanding of just who  presents a 
danger to the state.
Nevertheless! 
Neither Geller nor Spencer remotely presents such a danger. They  intended 
to come to Britain to join an EDL rally in Woolwich, in the wake of  the 
barbaric murder there of Drummer Lee Rigby by two Islamists last month.  
Personally, I believe the EDL is not a respectable platform to join.  
Whether or not its rally is itself a threat to public order is, however,  
another 
issue. As far as is known, it is not being banned. It is only Geller  and 
Spencer who have been banned from the country on the grounds that their  
presence is ‘not conducive to the public good’. The implication is that they  
will incite violence or disorder. But all the two of them do is criticise  
Islam, condemn jihadis and warn against the west’s failure to take seriously  
their machinations.
"Personally, I believe the EDL is not a respectable platform to join." I am 
 reminded of a time when I was in London, several years ago, and  witnessed 
an uncomfortable scene in which a prominent English writer dressed  down 
some EDL members with a cold fury. His accent was posh, theirs were not,  and 
as he upbraided them it became increasingly clear that he was outraged at  
their insolence -- that these lower class lads would dare to approach him and 
 speak with him as if he were an equal. The impression I got then has been  
reinforced many times since then: that the foes of jihad in Britain often  
oppose the EDL for the unspoken reason that it is made up of people from a  
lower social class, and people of lower social classes simply do not lead  
acceptable movements. Years ago I knew an Englishman who had emigrated to the 
 U.S., he told me, because Britain was such a class society that there was 
a  certain level beyond which he could not rise, no matter what his  
accomplishments and abilities. British class distinctions are, I believe,  
behind 
much of the sniffing at the EDL, and readiness to accept  Leftist/Islamic 
supremacist propaganda about it on the part of people who  would otherwise 
reject that propaganda.  
But I am an American. We don't have social classes here. Anyone who works  
for the freedom of speech and equality of rights of all people, and rejects  
the genuine thuggishness and authoritarianism of the Left and its Islamic  
supremacist allies, is A-OK with  me.


-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to