Hi Billy,

My main complaint about this list is not the content, but the tone.

The majority of issues are identified as things to be *against*.

That is not how I want Radical Centrism to be identified.

I would much rather pick a few key principles to be *for*, and then demonstrate 
how those value *lead* to being against normalization of homosexuality, the 
Islamicization of American society, etc.

-- Ernie P.


On Jun 29, 2013, at 9:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> Centroids:
> In the mid-1990s, I have traced this as far back as 1995 in letters
> from that time period in my files, I first became interested in Radical 
> Centrism.
> What appealed the most to me was how it was possible, as an expression
> of  RC philosophy, to combine otherwise disparate political positions
> almost always identified with either the Left  or the Right into a coherent
> political platform. Not a hypocritical campaign slogan, something
> actually worth believing in.
>  
> In 1995 many of my Radical Centrist ideas were not carefully thought through;
> a few ideas that have become important in the 2000s were not even on my radar
> at the time. But here is a personal list of my 10 most important Radical 
> Centrist
> political positions. You are free to disagree, and equally free to borrow
> any or all of these ideas for your own purposes.
>  
> The following list consists of pairs of related issues, pro vs. con in some 
> cases.
> In each case the current identification of these issues with Right or Left or 
> Other
> is indicated in 10 point typeface. Several are neither Left or Right but are
> Independent or Libertarian  -or Radical Centrist, i.e., a unique solution
> to political problems.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 10 Issues to identify Radical Centrism with  -in the public mind
>  
>  
> The strongest possible opposition to homosexuality.
> This is not reflexive conservatism by any stretch of the imagination.
> Everything is research-derived and based on behavioral science.
> The case to be made is empirical and follows the views of
> some of the best known names in the history of psychology.
>  
> Hard Right; Liberal-inspired reasoning..
>  
>  
>  
>  
> The strongest possible advocacy of gender partnership values
> in which men and women are seen as essential to each other in
> every way imaginable. The ideal should be clear to one and all:
> Marriage between men and women, child raising, and personal
> self-actualization as much as this can be done in a nurturing family.
> Anything that interferes with this value can only be interpreted as
> completely unacceptable and morally sick. This necessarily means
> the strongest possible criticism of pornography of all kinds, but
> making a distinction between hard porn and erotic arts. This has
> nothing to do with so-called soft porn or sexually suggestive humor.
>  
> Liberal-inspired but congruent with emphasis on family values
> on the Right to the extent that this is a fusion position. You can
> also identify this position with Libertarian values although a corollary
> is that strong families need to be part of healthy communities that are
> supportive of family formation and family success. Hence this is
> also a communitarian position.
>  
> -----
>  
> The strongest possible opposition to Islam
> (with the qualification that not all Muslims are alike, and
> the fact that none of this is intended to indicate bias against
> Arabs or Iranians or Pakistanis, etc, indeed, ethnically
> we are pro-Arab, pro-Iranian, pro-Pakistani, etc )
>  
> This position is generally identified with the Right but
> in origin it has everything to do with how Liberal values,
> especially as found in the US Constitution, are in
> direct and almost total conflict with Muslim values.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Strongly in favor of both Bible study and Comparative Religion
> in the schools
>  
> Bible study is associated with the Right, Comparative Religion is generally
> associated with the Left. The specific approach desired is unique
> to Radical Centrism and blends Left and Right and "Other."
>  
> -----
>  
> The strongest possible agreement with sociobiology / evolution.
> Generally very supportive of science and social science.
>  
> Liberal / classic Socialist (Not contemporary so-called socialist)
>  
>  
>  
> The strongest possible desire for creating new models for education
> that take full advantage of online learning, computer tech, etc
>  
> Neither Left nor Right; we are simply interested in what works,
> what is good, and how to make the most of creative ideas.
>  
> -----
>  
>  
> The strongest possible opposition to strip mining of coal
> (but otherwise pro-coal, pro-Keystone pipeline, pro-natural gas)
>  
> Left - Liberal viewpoint. Congruent with parts of Green politics.
> But also congruent with some conservative objectives.
>  
>  
>  
> Critical of both Keynes and  laissez faire  economics
> Priority: new economic theory   Re: Denning , etc
>  
> Independent viewpoint.
>  
>  
> -----
>  
> Strongly in favor of major changes in African-American culture.
> We don't need affirmative action, we need a new paradigm for black
> achievement though education, job opportunity, and new values. This
> does mean strong criticism of Rap so-called music but simultaneously
> strong advocacy of Jazz as a unique American musical art form.
>  
> Independent viewpoint with some conservative inspiration.
>  
>  
>  
> Strongly in favor of Free Speech. This means strong criticism of the mass 
> media
> and its regime of blatant bias in favor of the agenda of the political Left. 
> This also means willingness to consider ideas from the entire political 
> spectrum except
> authoritarian systems, especially Nazism / Fascism and Communism. This means
> strong sentiments in favor of Israeli success, and strong opposition to 
> anti-Semitism.
> We are singularly unimpressed with most forms of Anarchism  while recognizing
> that the systems advocated by Tolstoy and Kropotkin are in a different 
> category.
>  
> Independent - Libertarian inspired.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
>  
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to