_A Radical Centrist Debunks the Elite Establishment Narrative ..._ (http://radicalamericancentrist.blogspot.com/2013/04/enforcing-ideological-apartheid -online.html) radicalamericancentrist.blogspot.com
Debunking the Establishment Left vs Right Narrative This blog mixes ideas from the American Right and Left. For example, why not be against mass immigration and at the same time be for universal healthcare? Is that allowed in America? Why not be against affirmative action and at the same time be for taxing the rich more? Seems like there is some sort of unwritten law in American politics that forbids the combination of these ideas from the Right and Left. Why is that? Monday, April 22, 2013 Enforcing ideological apartheid online and in the media. How the rich keep the GOP and Dem political bundles separate and segregated, and why. why is amren and the rest of the anti-immigration movement c_haracterizing anti-immigration political parties as 'rightwing'_ (http://www.amren.com/features/2013/04/unruly-europe-part-two/) ? It is clear that rich investors and the corporations they own want more mass immigration. Being anti-immigration is NOT right wing. It is LEFTwing. Left mean being FOR the majority. Rightwing means being for the rich. If you are anti-immigration you are FOR the white citizen majority. That aint RIGHTwing. I can see why the corporate media wants to confuse right with left, as they do when they call Golden Dawn and similar parties rightwing for being anti-immigrant. But why does amren, et al., have to do this as well? The corporate media is a tool of the rich investors and their corporations. Is amren ALSO a tool of the rich investors that want to separate political ideologies into two separate bundles? By called anti-immigrant 'rightwing' you associate being anti-immigrant with being against progressive taxation, being against universal healtcare, being for a runaway military industrial complex and all the other nastiness that is associated with the Right in America. Stop enforcing ideological purity among the political ideology. In america we are forced to choose between two seperate and un-mixable bundles of political ideology: 1) on the conservative/rightwing side, we can choose the GOP that is supposedly against immigration and affirmative action/race spoils (but in reality they only give this lip service); and against progressive taxation and the social safety net, and against controls of how the wealthy can use their money. The rich definitely win when the GOP wins. 2) the liberal dems who are supposedly for taxing the rich more and for a strong social safety net (but increasingly just give this lip service); for more mass immigration and affirmative action/social safety net. etc. The rich also win when the Dems win. But the key to the rich winning either way is that the ideologies associated with both parties are bundled and un-mixable. For example, it is defacto forbidden to be FOR a strong social safety net and FOR progressive taxation while at the same time being AGAINST mass immigration and AGAINST race spoils/affirmative action. The media and the entire establishment enforces this ideological apartheid system. Amren is doing its part to enforce ideological apartheid as well by referring to golden dawn et al as 'rightwing'. And what a coincidence that every other anti-immigration website does the same. What a coincidence. posted by: A Working Class American ---------------------------------------------------------------- I call myself a Radical Centrist. I support the white majority because I am mostly white--not because I hate non-whites. I am against the rich because they are the predator-parasite on the majority. I generally do not support political correctness and multiculturalism. This is the ideology of the rich and powerful. I do not support whatever ideologies are promoted by those at the top. I support the right of Americans to associate with whomever they please, which means I support racial segregation. I am against mass immigration. Diversity is weakness for the majority and strength for the elite. I support a breakup of the USA because the larger the nation the less the degree of democracy. I support a strong welfare state and progressive taxation. I believe a nation should control the rich and their money. Some Reading? Google up Dr. Fresia's online book TOWARD AN AMERICAN REVOLUTION. Also see Dr. Woody Holton's book UNRULY AMERICANS. Also see Dr. Petra's online review THE CIA AND THE CULTURAL COLD WAR. Also, Goad's book REDNECK MANIFESTO and Michael Hoffman's book THEY WERE WHITE AND THEY WERE SLAVES. Also E.O Wilson's books on sociobiology. -- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
