While there may be some truth to the observations in the following  article,
it is also typical Left-wing rationalization: Paint those  you dislike
as backward and medieval.
 
What is omitted  -and what is very important-  is the fact that  
anti-homosexual
values, widely shared among whole populations, is commonplace in all
of eastern Europe, not just Russia. It is especially true for  Lithuania,
for example, and most Lithuanians are anti-Russian. In terms of
the assumptions of the article, this is impossible.
 
After all, Lithuanians aren't all that religious, yet the article ascribes 
criticism of homosexuality to religious bigotry.
 
In other words, the premises of the article are false.
 
But it is most interesting that an entire large nation will not tolerate  
homosexuals.
 
The entire large nation called the  "United States of America" did not  
tolerate
them either until an era of social insanity arose after 1973. Things do not 
 need
to stay the way they now are; we can become a sane nation  once again.
 
Billy
 
-------------------------------------
 
BUZZ FEED
 
 
_Miriam Elder _ (http://www.buzzfeed.com/miriamelder) 

 
 
 
< 

Why Russia Turned Against The Gays
Vladimir Putin’s new campaign for national — and  political — survival. 
posted on August 1, 2013 




 
 
Three months before Russia’s parliament unanimously passed a federal law  
banning the propaganda of “non-traditional relationships” — that is, 
same-sex  ones — the bill’s sponsor went on the country’s most respected 
interview 
show to  explain her reasoning.

“Analyzing all the circumstances, and the  particularity of territorial 
Russia and her survival…I came to the conclusion  that if today we want to 
resolve the demographic crisis, we need to, excuse me,  tighten the belt on 
certain moral values and information, so that giving birth  and raising 
children 
become fully valued,” _lawmaker Yelena Mizulina told  Vladimir Posner_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR2k-jSt54I) , Russia’s Charlie Rose.

Mizulina heads the Duma’s  committee for family, women, and children and 
has become the stern face of _Russia’s  campaign against gays_ 
(http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/photos-from-russia-everyone-needs-to-see) . But 
she would 
never call it that. Russia’s new laws —  banning same-sex foreign couples 
from adopting Russian children in addition to  banning LGBT advocacy — are 
part of the country’s very search for survival,  according to her.

On the one hand, there’s its physical survival —  Russia’s birthrate 
plummeted in the wake of the Soviet collapse and encouraging  baby-making 
(through government grants as well as rhetoric) has been one of  Vladimir 
Putin’s 
hallmarks. And then there’s its moral survival; if Russia is to  survive as 
Russia it needs to reject the corrupting influences of the  West.

The first form of reasoning is populist bluster. But the second  goes some 
way toward explaining why Russia has stepped up its campaign against  LGBT 
rights just as the European Union and the United States march in precisely  
the opposite direction. The violent images, restrictive legislation, and 
public  humiliation that LGBT people in Russia now face isn’t the product of a  
traditionalist backlash as much as it is a vital part of the new politics of 
 Putin’s Russia, a nation in search of someone to define itself  against.

Homosexuality wasn’t really a topic of conversation in Russia  for much of 
the last two decades. Laws banning gay sex were lifted in 1993, two  years 
after the Soviet collapse. Slowly but surely, gay clubs began to appear in  
Moscow and St Petersburg, at first underground, eventually out in the open.  
Russian society remained widely homophobic, and there were many who saw gays 
and  lesbians as an inevitable and evil Western import, but there were 
other things  to worry about — recovering from the collapse of a 
political-economic system,  clawing out of poverty, dealing with the explosion 
of violence 
that engulfed a  country suddenly flowing with cash and corruption.

And then came Vladimir  Putin.

Putin spent the first two terms of his presidency, from 2000 to  2008, 
ruling with no ideology. It was an explicit decision, his former campaign  and 
political advisor Gleb Pavlovsky once told me, that took into account the  
fact that so many had grown tired of the empty shell that Communist doctrine 
had  become by the end of Soviet times. Instead there would be Putin and just 
Putin.  _Putin  and his bare chest. Putin-loving animals. Putin 
single-handedly building  kindergartens and hospitals_ 
(http://www.buzzfeed.com/copyranter/16-homoerotic-photos-of-vladimir-putin) . 
Putin Putin Putin.

What that strategy  didn’t take into account was that sometime, some day, 
someone would get sick of  Putin. That finally happened late last year, when 
Putin announced he would  return to the presidency following a four-year 
break as prime minister. A  movement that largely comprised _middle-class  
liberals took to the streets in the tens of thousands_ 
(http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/04/anti-putin-protests-moscow-russia)
 . It was a show of  
criticism that Putin thought would never come.

Part of his reaction has  been reflexive and obvious to everyone — to 
launch a crackdown, arrest  opposition leaders, _arrest  average protesters_ 
(http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113581/moscows-may-6-protesters-perfect-show-
trial-putin-era) , adopt laws limiting future ability to protest. The  
second is more oblique: Putin has launched a campaign to shore up support in 
the 
 Russian “heartland,” that mythical place far from the bustling streets of 
Moscow  where headscarved peasants embrace core Russian concepts that don’t 
actually  exist anymore.

In the absence of any ideology — any core belief to tie  together the 
Russian state and nation — the easiest way to fill the vacuum has  been by 
turning to the Russian Orthodox Church, a deeply corrupt, reactionary,  and 
Kremlin-loving institution that has enjoyed a spike in support following the  
(atheist) Soviet Union’s collapse. Thus _the  arrest of Pussy Riot_ 
(http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/17/pussy-riot-trial-representatives-generation
) , the anti-Putin punk band whose members were sentenced  to two years in 
prison for “hooliganism motivated by religious hatred.” Thus the  _law  
passed by the Duma_ 
(http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/11/russia-law-banning-gay-propaganda)
  just hours after the anti-gay law was passed, making  
“insulting religious believers” an offense punishable by up to three years 
in  jail.

The second easiest thing has been to demonize the “Other,” creating  an 
internal enemy for everyone to fear. Jews are out — Putin, who values loyalty  
above all, has had an affinity for Jews since childhood, when he was 
reportedly  saved from being beaten up by street kids by a Jewish neighbor. 
Migrants are out  — Russia needs millions of them in order to carry out the 
mass 
infrastructure  projects that the country needs to keep its economy afloat; 
and the nationalist  card is simply too dangerous to play with anyway. Who’s 
left?  Gays.

Demonizing gays allows Putin to tell the “heartland”: I will  protect you 
and your “traditional” families; you are the real Russia. It also  grows 
suspicion of the liberal opposition, presented as fundamentally  “un-Russian” 
as they stand up increasingly for gay rights amid Putin’s growing  
crackdown. And finally, it allows Russia to do what it does best these days:  
present itself as Not The West.

It is no accident that Russia is  stripping away gay rights as (popular and 
legal) support for gay marriage in the  U.S. and Europe grows. The West is 
decadent, permissive, and doomed to orgiastic  decline. As Patriarch Kirill, 
the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, _recently put it_ 
(http://rt.com/news/church-same-sex-unions-404/) : gay  marriage is a 
“dangerous apocalyptic 
system” that leads a nation “on a path of  self-destruction.”

And then there is Russia — not really standing for  anything, but standing 
against a whole lot: gays, liberals, the West. It’s the  strategy that Putin 
has chosen for his own survival.

“I think the most  ridiculous questions come up during the decay of an 
empire,” said Anton  Krasovsky, a prominent Russian journalist recently fired 
for being gay, when  asked why the “gay question” had suddenly emerged in 
Russia. “It’s like when  Judeo-Christians were fed to the lions in 
third-century Rome — it’s just the  sunset of the empire.”

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to