A fair review would point out some strengths in the following  article,
but basically the whole thing is pathetic. More than anything this is  a
rationale for defeat, if not wholesale and immediate, defeat  nonetheless,
as if, while some rear guard actions may prove successful,
the war is lost. And this is presented as if it is "prophetic" ?
What a joke. It is an abdication of moral authority brought on 
by a massive failure of intellect. But, hey, Russell Moore is a 
smart religious bureaucrat, what could possibly be wrong?
 
That is exactly what is not needed at a time of crisis  like this.
What  is needed?  Someone like the Apostle Paul,  and
the sooner the better. Alas, Russell Moore seems to want to
imitate the example of Ralph Reed, as if that is an optimal
guide for the future. Reed, of course, is a world class
temporalizer.
 
Essentially Moore is lost and is clueless about what to do.
Acts 17 just might be looked at for a few ideas. Paul was
unafraid to argue (debate) with Stoic and Epicurean philosophers,
indeed, he is portrayed as unafraid to debate with still other  people.
He was informed and sure of his convictions. He took his message
to them and pressed his case. He knew their philosophy,  clearly
he had studied it in the past. He also knew their religious beliefs,
which clearly  he had also studied. He had educated himself for
exactly such debates and looked at disputes as opportunities.
Moore looks at disputes as misfortunes to avoid if at all
possible, and he sure in hell is not informed where he needs
to most be informed.
 
The article basically is sickening.
 
IMHO
Billy
 
 
==============================================
 
 
Real Clear Politics / WSJ
August 16, 2013
 
 
 
Russell Moore: From Moral Majority to 'Prophetic Minority' 
The new leader of the Southern Baptist political  arm says Christians have 
lost the culture and need to act accordingly. 

 
 
By  
    *   NAOMI SCHAEFER RILEY
'The Bible Belt is collapsing," says Russell Moore. Oddly, the incoming  
president of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty  
Commission doesn't seem upset. In a recent visit to The Wall Street Journal, 
Mr.  Moore explains that he thinks the Bible Belt's decline may be "bad for 
America,  but it's good for the church." 
Why? Because "we are no longer the moral majority. We are a prophetic  
minority." 
The phrase is arresting coming from such a prominent religious leader—akin 
to  a general who says the Army has shrunk to the point it can no longer 
fight two  wars. A youthful 41, Mr. Moore is among the leaders of a new 
generation who  think that evangelicals need to recognize that their values no 
longer define  mainstream American culture the way they did 50 or even 20 years 
ago. 
On gay marriage, abortion, even on basic religious affiliation, the culture 
 has moved away. So evangelicals need a new way of thinking—a new strategy, 
if  you will—to attract and keep believers, as well as to influence 
American  politics.  
The easy days of mobilizing a ready-made majority are gone. By "prophetic  
minority," he means that Christians must return to the days when they were a 
 moral example and vanguard—defenders of belief in a larger unbelieving 
culture.  He views this less as a defeat than as an opportunity. 
To illustrate his point, Mr. Moore tells the story about a friend from  
college two decades ago, an atheist, who asked for the name of a church that  
wasn't very demanding of its congregation. When Mr. Moore inquired why, the  
friend said he needed a church to attend because he planned to run for 
governor  some day. Mr. Moore says the story shows that in the past you had to 
join a  church even if you had no belief because everyone else belonged. But 
today his  friend wouldn't feel so obliged because "the idea that to be a 
good person, to  be a good American, you have to go to church" has largely 
disappeared. 
 
Vigorous, cheerful and fiercely articulate, Mr. Moore will take on one of  
evangelical America's most prominent jobs when he is officially installed 
next  month. He succeeds the influential Richard Land, who served in that role 
for a  quarter of a century. Like his predecessor, Mr. Moore is deeply 
knowledgeable  about religion, American history and politics. He has been an 
ordained pastor  and worked as an aide in Congress to former Rep. Gene Taylor 
(D., Miss.). 
Most recently Mr. Moore was dean of the Southern Baptist Theological  
Seminary, where his cultural savvy gained him a following among coreligionists  
and the secular media. He is a regular on Twitter and Facebook, with posts 
that  range from serious theology to self-deprecating jokes: "My toe is 
broken. My car  is broken down. A lifetime of country music has prepared me for 
this." The cover  story he wrote for the May issue of Christianity Today was 
called "W.W. Jay-Z?  How Christian hip-hop could call the American church 
back to the gospel—and  hip-hop back to its roots." 
He is definitely pushing a new tone for this generation of evangelicals.  
"This is the end of 'slouching toward Gomorrah,' " he says. Not only is the  
doomsaying not winning Christians any popularity contests, but he doesn't 
think  it's religiously appropriate either. "We were never promised that the 
culture  would embrace us."  
He also questions the political approach of what was once called "the  
religious right." Though his boyish looks bring to mind the former Christian  
Coalition leader Ralph Reed, Mr. Moore is decidedly not a fan of the "values  
voter checklists" the group employs. "There is no Christian position on the  
line-item veto," Mr. Moore says. "There is no Christian position on the  
balanced-budget amendment." 
Which is not to say that Mr. Moore wants evangelicals to "turn inward" and  
reject the larger U.S. culture. Rather, he wants to refocus the movement on 
 serving as a religious example battling in the public square on "three 
core  issues"—life, marriage and religious liberty.  
On protecting the unborn, Mr. Moore says he is a "long-term optimist" but 
"a  short-term pessimist." He doesn't get excited every time a poll shows 
that more  Americans are pro-life than pro-choice. He worries that the whole 
issue may be  changed soon "by technology"—that is, chemically induced 
abortions may soon  become the norm, with abortion clinics no longer the focal 
point of the debate.  He also worries that the fight for the unborn has become 
a 
one-party battle,  hardened along a Democrat and Republican divide. "The 
letterhead of Democrats  for Life," Mr. Moore says, "doesn't include the names 
of any current members of  Congress." 
But he also believes that this battle will not be won in Washington: "You  
have to take it to a personal level." He touts the many faith-based 
pregnancy  crisis centers that not only try to talk women out of having 
abortions, 
but also  help with child-care, job training and housing—"all of the things 
that have  brought them there in the first place." 
Mr. Moore is also deeply involved in the evangelical adoption movement.  
Eleven years ago, he and his wife, Maria, adopted two year-old babies, both  
boys, from a Russian orphanage. When the couple (who have three other sons)  
arrived at the orphanage, he says, they were struck by the "creepy silence" 
in a  building filled with babies. The children had stopped crying because 
they had  learned that no one would respond.  
In evangelical churches across the U.S., adoption—foreign and domestic—has 
 become increasingly common. "You don't need a canned adoption ministry 
program,"  Mr. Moore says. As members of the congregation get to know families 
who have  adopted, the example spreads. 
He says the same dynamic has made evangelicals more favorable to 
immigration.  "The immigration debate has become personalized," he says. "In 
the 
Midwest and  South and Southwest, our churches now have large immigrant 
populations. These  are our brothers and sisters in Christ." The people in the 
pews 
"understand  we're not going to deport 11 million people without a big 
government police  state"—something his coreligionists do not want. 
Though the Southern Baptist Convention 2011 resolution on immigration 
opposed  "amnesty," it also says: "The Scriptures call us, in imitation of God 
Himself,  to show compassion and justice for the sojourner and alien among 
us." Mr. Moore  notes the importance of keeping families together and says that 
 "self-deportation is not a solution." 
His cultural revival plan is also to focus more on local churches. When the 
 Supreme Court's decisions on gay marriage came down in June, Mr. Moore 
sent a  message to pastors to help them talk with their congregants about the 
Southern  Baptist opposition to the law. "We don't hate our gay and lesbian 
neighbors," he  says, but redefining marriage on their behalf is another 
matter. 
There are a couple of reasons why Christians are losing the debate over gay 
 marriage, Mr. Moore says. One is that even many Christians don't have a 
real  understanding of what marriage is. "We have embraced certain aspects of 
the  sexual revolution," he says, like the "divorce culture." 
Another is that many people assume "my marriage is my business"—why should  
they care if their neighbors marry someone of the same sex? Mr. Moore says 
the  part of the marriage ceremony when the pastor asks if anyone knows of a 
reason  why the couple should not wed is like a "vestigial organ." No one 
ever objects  "except in romantic comedies," but there was a time when a 
couple's marriage  decision was thought to be of church concern. He would like 
it to be again. 
As a "prophetic minority," Mr. Moore thinks his most profound political 
task  will be defending religious liberty from the assaults of a secular 
government.  The cause is at the heart of his plan to fight the contraception 
mandate in  ObamaCare. President Obama may have thought that religious 
employers 
would  accept being forced to pay for contraception, the morning-after 
abortion pill or  sterilization under the law. "But we are not adjusting to the 
new normal," Mr.  Moore avers. "We are not going to go away or back down." 
On Aug. 7, Colorado Christian University became the first nonprofit to sue  
the Department of Health and Human Services for its "final" rule on the 
issue.  The HHS rule requires organizations opposed on religious grounds to 
specific  contraceptives, sterilization or abortion to "designate" a third 
party to  provide those services. 
Mr. Moore sees this as a chance to unite believers of many faiths, and last 
 month he joined Archbishop William Lori of the U.S. Conference of Catholic 
 Bishops and other religious leaders in writing to Mr. Obama: "The HHS 
policy is  coercive and puts the administration in the position of defining—or 
casting  aside—religious doctrine. This should trouble every American." 
Mr. Moore says he hopes to make the ObamaCare mandate a major issue in the  
2016 election. By then, it will have become clear how intrusive the 
health-care  law has become, he says, and the American people will side with 
religious groups  that protest having to act against their beliefs. "The 
separation of church and  state," Mr. Moore says, "is not a liberal issue." 
In this task, he adds, the Baptists are returning to their roots as a  
minority at America's founding. He mentions how 17th century Virginia passed a  
law requiring that all ministers be ordained by the Anglican church—then the 
 established church of the colony. Many Baptist preachers were jailed for  
resisting the law, which is said to have influenced James Madison's views on 
 religious liberty.  
One of the jailed preachers was the prominent evangelist Jeremiah Moore, 
who  wrote in 1773: "God himself is the only one to whom man is accountable 
for his  religious sentiments simply, nor has he erected any tribunal on earth 
qualified  to judge whether the man worships in an acceptable manner or 
not." 
History turns, but the fight for religious liberty is eternal. Says another 
 Moore, 240 years later, "We are not going to go quietly into the  night."
 
 
 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to