The American Interest
 
 
 
October 2, 2013 
 
White Feminists and Korean Fundamentalists
Peter Berger 
 
Not long ago I had a conversation with the dean of a mainline Protestant  
divinity school. I asked him what his students are like these days. He said 
that  there are three main groups: white women—most of them feminists and/or 
GLBT  activists—African-Americans and Koreans, most in both groups being  
fundamentalists. He laughed and said that he was exaggerating a bit. He was  
indeed, though what he said rings a bell. Only the third group relates to  
immigration, which is the topic of my comments here. 
On September 23, 2013, Religion News Service carried a _story_ 
(http://www.religionnews.com/2013/09/23/commentary-hidden-immigration-impact-american-chu
rches/)   entitled “The hidden immigration impact on American churches”, 
by Wesley  Granberg-Michaelson (former general secretary of the Reformed 
Church in  America). There has been much interest in the growth of 
non-Christian 
religions  in the United States, which Diana Eck (who started the “
pluralist project” at  Harvard) has called “the most religiously diverse 
country in 
the world”. Maybe  so, but as Granberg-Michaelson points out, about 60% of 
immigrants currently  arriving in the US are Christians: “While millennials 
[young people] are walking  out the front door of U.S. congregations, 
immigrant Christian communities are  appearing right around the corner, and 
sometimes knocking at the back door. And  they may hold the key to vitality for 
American Christianity”. 
There is little doubt about the vitality “knocking at the back door”. How  
will this affect what comes in by the front door? The question is relevant 
for  both the Catholic and Protestant churches. Of course the largest group 
of  present immigrants (both legal and illegal) consists of Latinos—the 
majority  Catholics, but with a robust minority of Protestants (somewhere 
between 25% and  30%). Both groups exhibit “a vibrant spiritual life”. The same 
is true of  Christians coming from Africa and the Caribbean, and of Asians 
(coming from  China and Overseas Chinese communities, the Philippines and Korea
—more about the  last in a moment). As has always been the case with 
immigrants, the first  generation worships in ethnic churches, even if these 
are 
affiliated with larger  American denominations. With the second and third gene
rations, there is a  spillover effect as many of these people affiliate 
with non-ethnic congregations  (some because they have become Americanized, 
some because they live in places  where there are no ethnically defined 
churches). Does the “vitality” go with  them? There is no conclusive evidence 
of 
this, but I think that the answer is  probably yes, at least for a while. 
There is also the factor of differential  fertility, especially among Latinos—
it is projected that by 2050 there will be  106 million Latinos in the United 
States and as Granberg-Michaelson observes,  “their presence will quite 
literally change the face of American  Christianity”. 
Some immigrants change their religious behavior after they come here, but  
most continue to reflect the religious situation in their country of origin. 
The  Korean case is particularly interesting. The Philippines is the only 
Asian  country with a Christian majority (still mainly Catholic, as a result 
of Spanish  colonialism). But South Korea comes next—interestingly, since it 
had been  colonialized, not by Europeans, but by Japan. Christianity has 
grown  exponentially. In 1945 about 2% of the population was Christian. In 
1991 34% was  Protestant (about 8 million) and 11% Catholic (about 2.5 
million). I don’t how  many Protestants are Pentecostals or leaning in that 
direction, but most of  Korean Protestantism is staunchly Evangelical. In 2009 
Korea 
exported about  20,000 missionaries (second in numbers to the US). Yoido 
Full Gospel Church in  Seoul is the world’s largest mega-church. In 2001 there 
were 3,375 Korean  churches in the US. 
All of this is interesting in itself, but I would propose that the most  
important fact here (only alluded to in the RNS article) is this: Compared 
with  North America and Europe, most Christians in the non-Western World (now 
commonly  referred to as the Global South) are much more conservative, both 
theologically  and morally. 
Both in their theology and religious practice, non-Western Christians are  
more conservative. Their worldview is strongly supernaturalist: The 
spiritual  world, both benign and sinister, is very close—the Holy Spirit, the 
Virgin and  the saints, miracles of healing—but also the devil and other 
malevolent spirits.  This supernaturalism is strongest in the Pentecostal and 
charismatic movements,  but it is also very visible in Catholic and mainline 
Protestant churches. But  non-Western Christians are also more conservative in 
their moral  convictions—very little sympathy here for the feminism, let alone 
the agenda of  the gay movement, that has become so prominent in mainline 
Protestantism in  America—and, I suspect, would be more prominent in American 
Catholicism, were it  not for surveillance and intervention from Rome. 
The implication of all this is simple and exceedingly important: 
Immigration  will strengthen the conservative forces in American Christianity. 
This 
effect is  likely to diminish as the children of immigrants become more 
assimilated to  American culture (some, no doubt, will become more skeptical 
about 
miracles or  will discover the joy of being gay). However, unlike 
immigrants in earlier  periods of American history, those who come today don’t 
just 
stay put; rather  they go back and forth. Also, unless immigration becomes 
much more restrictive,  there will be recurring waves of newcomers, 
reinforcing the cultural pull of the  “old country”.  As ethnic identity 
weakens, the 
children of immigrants will  find indigenous, “Anglo” churches with a 
conservative bent that will appeal to  them.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to