Obama or not, that is an interesting article.  It would have been better if
they would have included coal.

Chris

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Block
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 7:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RC] USA now #1 in the world in energy production

 

Obama will fix that, don't worry about it.

 

David 

 

On Oct 5, 2013, at 9:44 AM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:





 

Time

 


The U.S. Is an Energy Superpower


New technologies have enabled the U.S. to become the world's top producer of
oil and natural gas by energy content. 



Read more:
<http://science.time.com/2013/10/04/the-u-s-is-an-energy-superpower/#ixzz2gr
JS6V3F>
http://science.time.com/2013/10/04/the-u-s-is-an-energy-superpower/#ixzz2grJ
S6V3F

 

By Bryan Walsh <http://science.time.com/author/bryanrwalsh/>  @bryanrwalsh
<http://www.twitter.com/bryanrwalsh>   Oct. 04, 2013

A new item by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) confirms what
we've been reporting for a while now
<http://science.time.com/2013/09/30/the-benefits-and-perils-of-energy-abunda
nce/> : the U.S. is an energy superpower. The EIA predicts
<http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=13251>  that in 2013, the
U.S. will be the world's top producer of petroleum and natural gas
hydrocarbons, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia, as the graph below shows:

  <http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/images/2013.10.04/production.png> 

(MORE: An Energy Boom That Could Last
<http://business.time.com/2013/10/03/texas-tea-party/> )

Not every hydrocarbon is equal-the U.S. produces about the same amount of
natural gas as it does petroleum, at least in terms of the BTUs of energy
those fuels can produce. Saudi Arabia, by contrast, produces nearly all
petroleum-and with oil running north of $100 a barrel and tradable around
the world, Saudi Arabia's oil is more valuable than America's gas, which
can't easily be exported.

But there's no denying how astounding-and how real-America's energy
revolution has been, as the EIA indicates:

Since 2008, U.S. petroleum production has increased
<http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=11351>  7 quadrillion Btu,
with dramatic growth in Texas and North Dakota. Natural gas production has
increased <http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=12311>  by 3
quadrillion Btu over the same period, with much of this growth coming from
the eastern United States. Russia and Saudi Arabia each increased their
combined hydrocarbon output by about 1 quadrillion Btu over the past five
years.

The main drivers behind that increase-aside from high energy prices, which
always encourage more drilling-are better hydrofracking and directional
drilling technologies, which have allowed energy companies to exploit oil
and natural gas resources in shale rock that were long considered
uneconomical. Fracking remains controversial-a new study
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/02/fracking-radioactive-w
ater-pennsylvania/2904829/>  from researchers at Duke University found
elevated levels of radium in a stream in Pennsylvania where treated fracking
wastewater had been discharged. (Industry advocates noted that the shale gas
industry hadn't taken wastewater to the treatment plant in question since
May 2011.)

But while environmentalists have managed to stop shale gas fracking in New
York, and may succeed in limiting it in California, there's little evidence
that they'll be able to halt the energy revolution altogether. During his
speech on climate change in June, Obama took time out to praise
<http://www.the-leader.com/x1806112266/Obama-touts-shale-gas-in-climate-spee
ch-angering-fracking-critics>  "cleaner-burning natural gas" for reducing
U.S. carbon emissions, and in general his Administration hasn't done much to
slow the pace of shale gas and oil development, at least on private
land.........

 

 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
<http://radicalcentrism.org/> 
 
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
 
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to