Daily Dot
 
How Libertarian philosophy drove the  Web's
largest black market
 
 
 
By _Aaron Sankin_ (http://www.dailydot.com/authors/aaron-sankin/)  on 
October 04, 2013 _Email_ 
(mailto:[email protected]?subject=How%20libertarian%20philosophy%20drove%20the%20Web's%20biggest%20black%20market)
  
 
As far as massive criminal enterprises go, political agendas  typically 
come in a distant second to amassing large amounts of cash.  
But when it came to online black market drug marketplace the Silk  Road—
whose alleged mastermind, 29-year old Ross Ulbricht, _was arrested in San 
Francisco on Tuesday morning_ 
(http://www.dailydot.com/crime/fbi-investigation-dread-pirate-roberts-silk-road/)
 —its status  as an online haven supposedly 
outside the reach of sovereign governments made it  a cause célèbre in some 
radical libertarian circles.

 
In looking at Ulbricht’s own _online footprint_ 
(http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/dread-pirate-roberts-silk-road-facebook-linkedin-youtube/)
 , the 
portrait emerges of a  techno-libertarian who turned his vision for the world’s 
foremost drug  marketplace into an economic force that apparently earned 
him over $72 million  in commissions.  
In a short manifesto posted on_  his LinkedIn page_ 
(http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=8155844&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=qSk_&locale=en_US&sr
chid=445369741380728571181&srchindex=1&srchtotal=1&trk=vsrp_people_res_name&
trkInfo=VSRPsearchId:445369741380728571181,VSRPtargetId:8155844,VSRPcmpt:pri
mary) , Ulbricht wrote about the lofty  goals he hoped to accomplish, 
presumably using the Silk Road for the betterment  of all humanity: 
I want to use economic theory as a means to abolish the use of  coercion 
and agression [sic] amongst mankind. Just as slavery has been  abolished most 
everywhere, I believe violence, coercion and all forms of force  by one 
person over another can come to an end. The most widespread and  systemic use 
of 
force is amongst institutions and governments, so this is my  current point 
of effort. The best way to change a government is to change the  minds of 
the governed, however. To that end, I am creating an economic  simulation to 
give people a first-hand experience of what it would be like to  live in a 
world without the systemic use of force.

 
Ulbricht, who allegedly went by the pseudonym “Dread Pirate Roberts,” was  
apparently a fan of the libertarian Ludwig von Mises Institute, which bills 
 itself as “the research and educational center of classical liberalism,  
libertarian political theory, and the Austrian School of economics.”  
Founded in the early 1980s after one of its co-founders split with  the 
politically powerful right-leaning Cato Institute, the Mises Institute’s  
namesake is a Ukraine-born philosopher whose magnum opus _Human  Action_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Action)  is considered an influential 
document 
among the Austrian,  laissez-faire school of economists. 
 
Much like novelist Ayn Rand, Mises has amassed a sizeable following  of 
American libertarians. In a _letter to  Rand_ 
(http://mises.org/journals/jls/21_4/21_4_3.pdf)  praising her landmark novel 
Atlas Shrugged, Mises wrote,  “
You have the courage to tell the masses what no politician told them: you are 
 inferior and all the improvements in your conditions which you simply take 
for  granted you owe to the effort of men who are better than you.” 
According to a sworn deposition by FBI Special Agent Christopher  Tarbell 
contained in the Department of Justice’s criminal complaint against  
Ulbricht, Ulbricht allegedly included a link to Mises Institute's website in 
his  
email signatures and regularly posted about the Institute’s work on the Silk  
Road’s forums. 
 
On his YouTube profile, Ulbricht favorited _an hour-long lecture_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0_Jd_MzGCw&list=PL9CB8F6707945DD95)  by Mises 
Institute scholar Robert P.  Murphy advocating for the privatization of the 
United 
States’ legal system  through the removal of government-operated civil and 
criminal courts in favor of  an ecosystem of competing arbitration firms. 
A representative from the Mises Institute acknowledged that Ulbricht  
requested information about the organization in 2008, but declined to go into  
more detail and refused to make any other representatives from the Institute  
available for comment.  
 
Interestingly, while Roberts expressed his enthusiasm for the Mises  
Institute, the think tank _hasn’t exactly been bullish on Bitcoin_ 
(http://mises.org/daily/6401/) —the anonymous,  electronic currency that served 
as Silk Road
’s chosen medium of  exchange.  
A 2011 post on the Institute’s website entitled “_A Clear Concise Look At 
Bitcoin_ (http://archive.mises.org/17294/a-clear-concise-look-at-bitcoin/) ,”
 signaled the currency’s  volatility, along with “the Silk Road folks 
signaling their willingness to work  with ‘authorities’ if necessary,” as 
reasons to be skeptical—adding, “Caveat  emptor” (“buyer beware”).
 
Another article published on the site a few months later, after a  dramatic 
crash in the currency’s value, expressed support for, at the very  least, 
the theoretical underpinnings behind Bitcoin.  
“Any libertarian has to have some sympathy for any effort to create  an 
alternative currency, and the state has narrowed the options so much that we  
can fully expect a long series of nonviable projects to emerge in the future,”
  read the blog post. “It is part of the terrible struggle of our times to 
find  ways of living free in an age of government omnipotence.”
 
In _an August interview with Forbes_ 
(http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/08/14/an-interview-with-a-digital-drug-lord-the-silk-roads-dread-pi
rate-roberts-qa/) , Dread Pirate Roberts  insisted anonymization services 
like Tor and Bitcoin not only made Silk Road  possible but also have the 
potential to remake human interaction for the better.  “This will return the 
power of communication back to the people and with Bitcoin  giving people 
control over their money and trade again, we’re talking about the  potential 
for 
a monumental shift in the power structure of the world,” he  said.
 
But the morailty behind the  the Silk Road looks a lot more  complicated 
when you consider which specific items Roberts, who allegedly  maintained 
tight control over virtually every aspect of the site, prohibited  from being 
sold on the marketplace. 
According to the criminal complaint, in August of 2011, Roberts  announced 
the creation of a new section of the site titled "forgeries," where  people 
could buy and sell fake government documents such as IDs and  passports—the 
FBI claims Ulbricht even _purchased them himself_ 
(http://www.dailydot.com/crime/fbi-investigation-dread-pirate-roberts-silk-road/)
 . However, private 
documents such as  receipts and university diplomas were strictly prohibited. 
 
In a sense, private documents like receipts or diplomas are written  
evidence of legal contracts. The importance of contracts between consenting  
individuals is a crucial tenet of libertarian thought and an issue the Mises  
Institute has examined in detail on _multiple_ 
(http://mises.org/journals/jls/17_2/17_2_2.pdf)  _occasions_ 
(http://mises.org/rothbard/ethics/nineteen.asp) 
. In a libertarian-minded, small-government state,  it’s the prevalence of 
these types of contracts that keep a civilized society  from slipping into 
anarchy. In the lecture Ulbricht favorited on YouTube, Mises  scholar Robert 
Murphy’s argument about privatizing the judicial system only  works—even in 
the abstract—if private contracts are universally  honored. 
 
As such, if Ulbricht is indeed the Dread Pirate Roberts and  he  viewed the 
Silk Road as a fundamentally moral undertaking, it isn’t actually all  that 
surprising he chose to draw the line regarding forged documents along the  
public-private divide. 
It wasn’t only the Silk Road’s alleged mastermind who viewed the  
marketplace as something more noble than a relatively safe avenue for  
trafficking 
in illegal narcotics. On _Reddit’s  r/SilkRoad_ 
(http://www.reddit.com/r/silkroad)  forum, a user going by the handle 
InfraViole7 wrote a post  calling 
the Silk Road’s closure, “a loss for the general good of human,  regardless 
if you are pro illegal drugs or not."
 
The SR was not doing anything morally wrong, rather the  opposite. Think 
about it. Druggies and producers will always find a way to  trade drugs. The 
SR made it possible to trade the drugs with less to no  intermediaries, 
directly from producer to consumer. As we all know, the  dealing process is the 
whole reason why the world has to deal with all type of  war related to 
drugs, for an example in Mexico. From a moral standpoint, what  the SR have 
done 
is to prevent war, gang related crime etc. which is a  really good thing.

 
Another Reddit user, Libertas_SR, wrote a post _soliciting donations for 
Ulbricht’s defense_ 
(http://www.reddit.com/r/silkroadmeta/comments/1no8bz/supporting_the_cause/) . 
“We are all sad  to see SR get shut down, but it is 
also a sad day for the person that provided  us with this amazing community,” 
wrote Libertas_SR. “He has a very long battle  ahead of him and the least we 
can do is support him, and I am providing the  means to do that.” 
Ulbricht stands accused of conspiracy to commit narcotics  trafficking, 
hiring one Silk Road user to kill another Silk Road user for  threatening to 
expose confidential information about the site, computer hacking  and money 
laundering.
 
In an ironic twist, authorities told the San Francisco Chronicle  that, as 
of June, Ulbricht was _living with a friend on Hickory Street in San 
Francisco’s Hayes Valley  neighborhood_ 
(http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Alleged-online-drug-kingpin-arrested-at-SF-library-4863306.php)
  and, on at least 
one occasion, managed the site from an  Internet cafe on nearby Laguna Street 
from which he administered the Silk Road  website. Momy Tobi’s Revolution 
Cafe & Art Bar, the Internet cafe located a  block away from the intersection 
of Hickory and Laguna streets, is  communist-themed.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to