>From the site:
Big Think
 
 
 
How To Be a Polymath
 
by _Steven  Mazie_ (http://bigthink.com/users/stevenmazie)  
November 6, 2013


 
 
Thinking back on the college recommendations I’ve written over the  past 
few weeks, a pattern leaps up: the most successful students, the ones who  are 
the most lively and engaged in class, the most interesting and most  
dedicated, are never merely great students. They are also utterly devoted to 
six  
other pursuits. This used to puzzle me. How can a kid write such detailed 
and  analytically involved nightly reading journals on Augustine and Dante, 
schedule  meetings with me about multiple drafts of her essays, excel in a 
Dostoevsky  seminar, third-semester Calculus and painting and find the time to 
edit  the school newspaper, run the debate club, take photography classes, 
volunteer  at her city councilman’s office, sing in a band and write 
prize-winning poetry  on the side?   
I exaggerate, but only slightly. As humbling as it is  to write letters for 
students like these, it’s also enlightening, and it’s not  just about the 
elite few humans who can handle doing more than one thing well.  “Our age 
reveres the specialist,” _writes_ 
(http://www.aeonmagazine.com/world-views/anyone-can-learn-to-be-a-polymath/)   
Robert Twigger, “but humans are natural 
polymaths, at our best when we turn our  minds to many things.” It’s not 
just the youngsters who can join the polymath  party: 
[T]he pessimistic assumption that learning somehow ‘stops’ when  you leave 
school or university or hit thirty is at odds with the evidence. It  
appears that a great deal depends on the nucleus basalis, located in the basal  
forebrain. Among other things, this bit of the brain produces significant  
amounts of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter that regulates the rate at which  
new connections are made between brain cells. This in turn dictates how  
readily we form memories of various kinds, and how strongly we retain  them. 
So what’s the trick to letting the acetylcholine flow  more abundantly? 
Twigger again:
 
 
People as old as 90 who actively acquire new  interests that involve 
learning retain their ability to learn. But if we stop  taxing the nucleus 
basalis, it begins to dry up. In some older people it has  been shown to 
contain no 
acetylcholine — they have been ‘switched off’ for so  long the organ no 
longer functions. In extreme cases this is considered to be  one factor in 
Alzheimers and other forms of dementia — treated, effectively at  first, by 
artificially raising acetylcholine levels. But simply attempting new  things 
seems to offer health benefits to people who aren’t suffering from  
Alzheimers. After only short periods of trying, the ability to make new  
connections 
develops. And it isn’t just about doing puzzles and crosswords;  you really 
have to try and learn something new.
Trying something new. Hmmmm. What kind of thing?  There’s evidence that 
something as trivial as changing the path you use when you  walk home from the 
subway can rewire your brain for the better. But beyond  tweaking your habit 
trail, there are more meaningful pursuits you might try, or  adopt. Two 
years ago, while on a fellowship that cut my teaching load in half  and brought 
me from New York City to a bucolic liberal arts campus a couple of  hours 
away, I had enough newfound headspace to write a piece for the New  York 
Times and soon thereafter accepted an offer to launch _Praxis_ 
(http://bigthink.com/blogs/praxis)  here at Big Think. I had no  idea if I’d be 
able to keep 
up the writing while being a dad and a teacher and a  runner, but I thought I
’d give it a try. The experience has been busy, yes, but  manageable, and a 
few months later I started blogging for The Economist as well. Adding new 
activities to my plate—not just any  activities, but stuff I really enjoyed 
doing and had some affinity for—seems to  have given me a new source of 
energy, and sometimes when I’m exhausted I’m also,  strangely, exhilarated. 
Modern capitalist society bears part of the blame for  generating 
generations of “monomaths.” A monomath, in Trigger’s words, is “a  person with 
a 
narrow mind, a one-track brain, a bore, a super-specialist, an  expert with no 
other interests.” You can’t have a modern economy without some  degree of 
specialization, but taken too far the division of labor turns  individuals, 
in Marx’s words, into automatons, _“appendage[s] of the machine.”_ 
(http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007)
  
It’s the _price we pay_ 
(http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01a.htm)  
for our species’ relentless progress and  
ever-increasing gains in productivity: 
For as soon as the distribution of labour comes  into being, each man has a 
particular, exclusive sphere of activity, which is  forced upon him and 
from which he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a fisherman,  a herdsman, or a 
critical critic, and must remain so if he does not want to  lose his means of 
livelihood. (from Marx’s German  Ideology)
Does this conundrum sound familiar? You can raise your skeptical  eyebrows, 
all my critical critics, about the plausibility or desirability of  Marx’s 
alternative—my students certainly do—but close your eyes and imagine this  
for a second: 
[I]n communist society, where nobody has one  exclusive sphere of activity 
but each can become accomplished in any branch he  wishes, society regulates 
the general production and thus makes it  possible for me to do one thing 
today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the  morning, fish in the afternoon, 
rear cattle in the evening, criticise after  dinner, just as I have a mind, 
without ever becoming hunter, fisherman,  herdsman or critic. This fixation 
of social activity, this  consolidation of what we ourselves produce into an 
objective power above us,  growing out of our control, thwarting our 
expectations, bringing to naught our  calculations, is one of the chief factors 
in 
historical development up till  now.
Few of us can dream of becoming such radical  polymaths. (And some of us 
may consider this extreme de-specialization to be  nightmarish.) But it 
undervalues our lives to willingly enter into mindless  ruts. If you’re in a 
rut, 
at least be aware of the fact, and let it spur you to  take some action. 
Take that sabbatical, if you are lucky enough to get one. Make  stuff. Pursue a 
new interest. Learn a new language. Stop this, start that.  Consider career 
changes, even if you don’t actually make one. Do  something new. Come on, it
’s good for  you.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to