Atlas Shrugs
 
"The Syria mess  is Obama's doing," 
Pamela Geller, The Jerusalem Post, December 14, 2013
Syria, Israel's northern neighbor, is becoming a destination for  jihadists 
from all over the world; Who is to blame? President Barack  Obama.   
Syria is the new rallying point for the worldwide jihad. There has not been 
 a secular fighting force in Syria for close to a year. Instead, it has 
become  the destination for jihadists across the world to engage in holy war. 
This war  is not about nationality, borders, geography. Jihadists in Syria 
include  British, American, French, German, 
and Norwegian Muslims.
 
It has come to this: Israel and the world have to choose between Bashar  
Assad and al-Qaida. Former Israeli Chief of Staff Dan Halutz said Tuesday that 
 although "the Syrian regime is killing its citizens every day, we have to  
recognize that the opposition in Syria is made up primarily of Muslim 
extremists  like Al Qaeda." He concluded: "The question, 'what is better for 
Israel?' is an  important question, because we need to ask ourselves if we want 
to swap the bad  Syrian regime we know for a very bad regime that we don't 
know."
 
Related: This is Barack Obama's  doing. He has supported every single 
transition in the Middle East from secular  Arab state to brutal Sharia 
thugocracy. And he supports the jihadi savages in  Syria. The only movement we 
should 
be supporting in Syria are the Kurds who have  declared independence. The 
genocide of millions of religious minorities by the  Muslim supremacists 
would be stopped in an independent Kurd state. 

I have been reporting on Obama's alignment with enemies of America since  
Obama took office and his support of jihad elements in Syria for well over a  
year now. The Wall Street Journal ran a front-page news story confirming 
this  treachery in November -- so why isn't Congress calling for hearings? Why 
are  our elected officials standing by while a traitorous administration 
backs the  very enemy that has vowed to destroy us and has brutally attacked 
us at home  and abroad?
 
In the middle of this fresh hell stands the indefatigable Jewish state.  
They face the Muslim Brotherhood to the south, al-Qaida to the north, and  
hostile invaders within their own borders, with the tacit support of an  
American President who is aligned with these vicious, Jew-hating supremacist  
forces. A terrorist takeover of Syria promises death and destruction not just  
for Israel, but for all free nations. Is this the objective of Obama's  
statecraft? What does he expect the region to look like in ten or twenty  
years? 
A sheet of glass? 
 
The idea that Obama is somehow naive or clueless is indeed clueless. The  
terrible fact is that in every situation, in every conflict, Obama supports  
the jihadists. In Libya, Obama involved the United States in the efforts to  
overthrow Qaddafi without congressional approval, and without anything 
close  to national self-interest. And while Qaddafi was a somewhat madcap 
barbarian,  he was secular. And yes, as can be seen by what followed his 
overthrow, he  contained the jihadist threat in that part of Africa.
 
Obama aided and abetted the rise of the Islamic supremacist regime in  
Libya, which is has now "transitioned" to Sharia government. When Ambassador  
Christopher Stevens and others at our embassy in Benghazi called for help  
against the growing jihad threat there, the Obama administration employed an  
Al Qaeda brigade as additional security for the embassy. Is it any wonder 
that  the jihadists who attacked our consulate and murdered our people had  
intelligence that could only have come from insiders? They knew where  
Ambassador Chris Stevens's safe-house was, as well as where the fuel  was.
 
After the fall of Libya, Mali fell to jihadists as well. There was a  major 
(although almost completely ignored) jihad attack on a British Petroleum  
gas complex in Algeria: hundreds of non-Muslims were taken hostage and scores 
 murdered. The jihadis have been acting with greater impunity than ever,  
knowing that Obama is going to do little or nothing to stop them, and may  
actively send them aid. 
 
For Libya was just one in a long string of Obama interventions on behalf  
of jihadists. As soon as Obama came into office in 2009, he made an apology  
tour to the Muslim world. At its center was his historic June 4, 2009 speech 
 to the ummah, which he delivered from Al-Azhar University in Cairo. Just 
five  months into his presidency at the time, he invited the then-banned 
Muslim  Brotherhood to that speech.
 
That invitation prohibited Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak or his  cabinet 
from attending that speech. Obama had, in effect, decided then where  he 
was going with Egypt. And so it went.
 
Concurrently, the Iranian people were marching and taking to the streets  
for freedom --the only real freedom revolution that took place in the Middle  
East. They were marching for freedom because they had been living under the 
 boot of the Sharia since 1979 when the Ayatollah Khomeini seized power in 
a  coup against the shah.
 
This was a real freedom revolution, led by  women

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to