January 4, 2014
 
After a schism, a question: Can atheist churches  last?
 
By Katie Engelhart, special to CNN 
LONDON (CNN) - The Sunday Assembly was riding high. 
The world’s most voguish - though not its only - atheist church opened last 
 year in London, to global attention and abundant acclaim. 
So popular was the premise, so bright the promise, that soon the Sunday  
Assembly was ready to franchise, branching out into cities such as New York,  
Dublin and Melbourne. 
“It’s a way to scale goodness,” declared Sanderson Jones, a standup comic 
and  co-founder of The Sunday Assembly, which calls itself a “godless  
congregation.” 
But nearly as quickly as the Assembly spread, it split, with New York City  
emerging as organized atheism’s Avignon. 
In October, three former members of Sunday Assembly NYC announced the  
formation of a breakaway group called Godless Revival. 
“The Sunday Assembly,” wrote Godless Revival founder Lee Moore in a 
scathing  blog post, “has a problem with atheism.” 
Moore alleges that, among other things, Jones  advised the NYC group to “
boycott the word atheism” and “not to have speakers  from the atheist 
community.” It also wanted the New York branch to host Assembly  services in a 
churchlike setting, instead of the Manhattan dive bar where it was  launched. 
Jones denies ordering the NYC chapter to do away with the word “atheism,” 
but  acknowledges telling the group “not to cater solely to atheists.” He 
also said  he advised them to leave the dive bar “where women wore bikinis,” 
in favor of a  more family-friendly venue. 
The squabbles led to a tiff and finally a schism between two factions 
within  Sunday Assembly NYC. Jones reportedly told Moore that his faction was 
no 
longer  welcome in the Sunday Assembly movement. 
Moore promises that his group, Godless Revival, will be more firmly 
atheistic  than the Sunday Assembly, which he now dismisses as “a humanistic 
cult.”
 
In a recent interview, Jones described the split as “very sad.” But, he  
added, “ultimately, it is for the benefit of the community. One day, I hope  
there will soon be communities for every different type of atheist, agnostic 
and  humanist. We are only one flavor of ice cream, and one day we hope 
there'll be  congregations for every godless palate." 
Nevertheless, the New York schism raises critical questions about the 
Sunday  Assembly. Namely: Can the atheist church model survive? Is disbelief 
enough to  keep a Sunday gathering together? 
Big-tent atheism 
I attended my first service last April, when Sunday Assembly was still a  
rag-tag venture in East London. 
The service was held in a crumbly, deconsecrated church and largely 
populated  by white 20-somethings with long hair and baggy spring jackets (a 
group 
from  which I hail.) 
I wrote that the Assembly “had a wayward, whimsical feel. At a table by the 
 door, ladies served homemade cakes and tea. The house band played Cat 
Stevens.  Our ‘priest’ wore pink skinny jeans.” 
I judged the effort to be “part quixotic hipster start-up, part Southern  
megachurch.” 
The central idea was attractive enough. The Assembly described itself as a  
secular urban oasis, where atheists could enjoy the benefits of traditional 
 church - the sense of community, the weekly sermon, the scheduled time for 
 reflection, the community service opportunities, the ethos of 
self-improvement,  the singing and the free food - without God. I liked the 
vibe and the 
slogan:  “Live Better, Help Often, Wonder More.” 
Shortly thereafter, Assembly services began bringing in hundreds of 
similarly  warm-and-fuzzy nonbelievers. The wee East London church grew too 
small, 
and the  Assembly moved to central London’s more elegant Conway Hall. 
The Assembly drew criticism, to be sure—from atheists who fundamentally  
object to organized disbelief, from theists who resent the pillaging of their  
texts and traditions. But coverage was largely positive - and it was  
everywhere. 
In September, a second wave of coverage peaked, with news that the Assembly 
 was franchising: across England, Scotland, Ireland, Canada, the United 
States  and Australia. That month, the founders launched a crowd-funding 
campaign that  aims to raise $802,500. (As of mid-December, less than $56,000 
had 
been  raised.) 
Still, prospective Sunday Assembly franchisers seemed exhilarated. Los  
Angeles chapter founder Ian Dodd enthused that he would “have a godless  
congregation in the city of angels.” In November, his inaugural Assembly drew  
more than 400 attendees. 
But as the atheist church grew, it began to change—and to move away from 
its  atheism. 
“How atheist should our Assembly be?” wrote Jones in August. “The short  
answer to that is: not very.” 
Pippa Evans, Assembly’s other co-founder, elaborated: “‘Atheist Church’ 
as a  phrase has been good to us. It has got us publicity. But the term ‘
atheist’ does  hold negative connotations.” 
Warm-and-fuzzy atheism gave way to not-quite atheism: or at least a very  
subdued, milquetoast nonbelief. Sunday services made much mention of  “
whizziness” and “wonder”—but rarely spoke of God’s nonexistence. 
The newer, bigger Sunday Assembly now markets itself as a kind of atheist  
version of Unitarian Univeralism: irreligious, but still eager to include  
everyone. 
In a way, this is a smart move. According to the 2012 Pew Forum on Religion 
 & Public Life, 20% of Americans have no religious affiliation, but just a  
fraction of those identify as atheists. 
A godless congregation is likely to draw crowds if it appeals to what Herb  
Silverman, founder of the Secular Coalition for America, calls “big-tent”  
atheism, which includes “agnostics, humanists, secular humanists, 
freethinkers,  nontheists, anti-theists, skeptics, rationalists, naturalists, 
materialists,  ignostics, apatheists, and more.” 
But atheists who wanted a firmly atheist church—a Sunday Assembly where  
categorical disbelief is discussed and celebrated—will not be satisfied. 
As the Sunday Assembly downplays its atheism, it also appears increasingly  
churchlike. 
Starting a Sunday Assembly chapter now involves a “Sunday Assembly 
Everywhere  accreditation process,” which grants “the right to use all the 
Sunday 
Assembly  materials, logos, positive vibe and goodwill.” 
Aspiring Sunday Assembly founders must form legal entities and attend  “
training days in the UK,” sign the Sunday Assembly Charter and pass a three- to 
 six-month peer review. Only then may formal accreditation be granted. 
This is not an East London hipster hyper-localism anymore. 
Selling swag and charisma 
Organized atheism is not necessarily new. French Revolutionaries, for  
instance, were early atheist entrepreneurs. 
In 1793, secularists famously seized the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, to  
build a “Temple of Reason.” They decorated the church with busts of  
philosophers, built an altar to Reason, lit a torch of Truth - and brought in 
an  
actress to play Liberty. 
A half-century later, French philosopher Auguste Comte drew acclaim for his 
 “religion of humanity,” which imagined an army of secular sages 
ministering to  secular souls. London has hosted formal atheist gatherings for 
almost 
as  long. 
History suggests, then, that there is nothing inherently anti-organization  
about atheism. As Assembly’s Sanderson Jones puts it, “things which are  
organized are not necessarily bad.” 
To be sure, Sunday Assembly members in the United States say they've long  
wanted to join atheist congregations. 
Ian Dodd, a 50-something camera operator in Los Angeles, had long been a  
member of the Unitarian Universalist Church; he enjoyed it, but wanted 
something  more explicitly irreligious. 
Nicole Steeves of the Chicago chapter found herself yearning for a secular  
community—a “place to check in and think about things bigger than the  
day-to-day”—after having her first child. 
But it is one thing to support an atheist "church" - where the ‘c’ is 
small  and the effort is local - and another to back an atheist ‘Church’ that 
is global  and centralized. 
The former responds directly to the needs and fancies of its community. The 
 latter assumes that its particular brand of disbelief is universally  
relevant—and worthy of trademark. 
Centralized atheism also feeds hungrily on charisma, and Sanderson  Jones, 
who resembles a tall, bearded messiah - and who, despite the SA  
recommendation that Assembly hosts should be regularly rotated, dominates each  
London 
service - provides ample fuel. 
But it remains to be seen whether the Sunday Assembly’s diluted godlessness 
 is meaty enough to sustain a flock. 
“Because it is a godless congregation, we don’t have a doctrine to rely on,
”  explains Sunday Assembly Melbourne’s founder, “so we take reference 
from  everything in the world.” 
So far, Assembly sermonizers had included community workers, physicists,  
astronomers, wine writers, topless philanthropers, futurologists, happiness  
experts, video game enthusiasts, historians and even a vicar. The pulpit is 
open  indeed. 
My own misgivings are far less academic. I’m simply not getting what the  
Sunday Assembly promised. I’m not put off by the secular church model, but  
rather the prototype. 
Take an October service in London, for example: 
Instead of a thoughtful sermon, I got a five-minute Wikipedia-esque lecture 
 on the history of particle physics. 
Instead of receiving self-improvement nudges or engaging in conversation 
with  strangers, I watched the founders fret (a lot) over technical glitches 
with the  web streaming, talk about how hard they had worked to pull the 
service off, and  try to sell me Sunday Assembly swag. 
What’s more, instead of just hop, skipping and jumping over to a local 
venue,  as I once did, I now had to brave the tube and traverse the city. 
Back in New York, Lee Moore is gearing up for the launch of Godless Revival 
-  but still speaks bitterly of his time with the Sunday Assembly network. 
Over the telephone, I mused that the experience must have quashed any  
ambition he ever had to build a multinational atheist enterprise. 
“Actually,” he admitted, “we do have expansion  aims.”

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to